My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-00 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
06-27-00 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:25:13 PM
Creation date
8/6/2008 10:42:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 27, 2000 <br />The City Administrator reported that he is working with Ramsey County <br />to finalize the contract for the Little Ca~rada Road improvement project. <br />There are still some details to be worked out at this time, however. <br />Morelan recommended approval of the contract once it meets the approval <br />of the City Attorney and City Administrator. <br />Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO 2000-6-759 -APPROVING THE AGREEMENT <br />WITH RAMSEY CO UNTY FOR THE LITTLE CANADA ROAD <br />IMPROVEMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY <br />ATTORNEYAND CITYADMINISTRATOR AND AUTHORIZING <br />THE MAYOR AND CITYADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE THE <br />AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) Morelan, Scalze, Pedersen, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />ACCOUNTING The Mayor and Council welcomed Tina Hix as the City's new Accounting <br />SUPERVISOR Supervisor. <br />SETBACKS Morelan suggested that the Council take a look at setback requirements for <br />properties abutting parcels of land which will never be developed, such as <br />the Water Works property, railroad property, freeway property. Morelan <br />suggested that there may be reason to reduce the setbacks in these areas <br />given that the adjacent property will never be developed. <br />The Council discussed the suggestion, and Pedersen pointed out that the <br />possibility of additional freeway lanes that would impact Morelan's <br />suggestion about reducing setbacks along these areas. Fahey agreed that <br />freeway right-of--way was different than railroad property or the Water <br />Works property given the potential for widening the freeway, and <br />suggested that the setback not be reduced for properties abutting the <br />freeway. <br />Scalze stated that she was concerned with decreasing the setbacks in <br />certain situations given the fairness and consistency issue. Scalze felt that <br />if setbacks are not causing a problem, then the requirements should be left <br />as is. Scalze pointed out that problems arise with the issue of setbacks <br />when someone is trying to build a structure that is too big for the lot. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.