Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Parks & Recreation Commission <br />November 2, 2000 <br />Gray recomn:erzded that City staff begin the process of acquiring property to cornplete the <br />City's trail systern by talking to landowners, with frequent updates to be given to the <br />Comn:zsstor:. <br />Motion seconded by Sackett Glaser. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />ON-STREET The City Administrator stated that the Council recently restricted parking on roads with <br />PARKING on-street pedesri-ian paths since it was felt that parking on the streets could present a <br />hazardous situation to pedestrians. The streets were posted as "no parking" and now the City <br />has received complaints from residents who want to park on the streets. At the same time, <br />there are several people who feel that the signs are definitely needed. The Administrator <br />commented that residents can apply for parking permits for special occasions where on-street <br />parking is needed. However, there are some residents who stated they may have guests over <br />on the spur of the moment so they would not have time to obtain such a permit. <br />Gray stated that streets with on-street pedestrian paths were widened specifically for use by <br />pedestrians, not cars. He felt that the signs should remain. <br />The City Adtninish~ator stated that some streets have busier pedestrian traffic than others, acrd <br />perhaps they warrant a different approach. Sackett Glaser felt that the same policy should be <br />implemented City-wide, otherwise some residents will feel they are not being treated fairly. <br />Anderson suggested posting only one side of the streets as "no parking." Sackett Glaser did <br />not like this idea since pedestrians are always supposed to be walking against traffic. <br />Sackett Glaser stated that residents on Edgerton Street and Keller Parkway have been living <br />with "no parking" on their street with few complaints. <br />The Director stated that pedestrian and automobile traffic are not a good mix. He felt that in <br />the future, on-street paths should not be approved. The City should approve off street paths <br />only. He commented that he sympathizes with the residents who want to park on their <br />streets, but he felt that pedestrian safety must come first. He felt that since the City has <br />designated these as pedestrian walk areas, the City has a duty to protect those pedestrians <br />while they are using the walk areas. Sackett Glaser stated that in future developments, the <br />people should at least be informed that if on-street paths are installed, no parking will be <br />allowed. The City Administrator stated that could be more clearly emphasized in the <br />improvement process. <br />Sackett Glaser reconureended retaining the City's policy of "r:o parking" on Ctty streets <br />that contain striped on-street pedestrian path. <br />Motion seconded by Gray. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />Page4of5 <br />