My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-00 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
04-13-00 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2008 2:34:44 PM
Creation date
8/6/2008 2:27:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 13, 2000 <br />Hanson pointed out that Preferred Builders has tried to accommodate the <br />neighbors, and noted that none of the easements exist on their property. <br />He also noted that none of the proposed homes would access Mitchell <br />Trail. <br />Klidzejs again indicated that they are trying to minimize the impact of the <br />new development on their property. She noted that their privacy is being <br />jeopardized. Klidzejs expressed concern about the possible future <br />development of Tract A with access for the new house being constructed <br />to come via Mitchell Trail. <br />Montour pointed out that access for the Klidzejs property at 3244 Twin <br />Lake Road is via Mitchell Trail. <br />Hanson pointed out that they are not proposing to use Mitchell Trail. <br />Klidzejs pointed out that there is nothing in writing to that effect and there <br />is no proposal to vacate Mitchell Trail. There is still the possibility that <br />Tract A could be subdivided in the future. Klidzejs stated that they are <br />trying to preserve the character of the neighborhood as much as they can. <br />Keis pointed out that the new house being constructed looks to be fairly <br />expensive, and he would assume that the new owners will have much the <br />same concerns that the Klidzejs have expressed. Keis felt that these new <br />homeowners will maintain the easement area and would prefer to look at <br />grass than at gravel. <br />Preferred Builders indicated that they will install the drive over the <br />easement, and again pointed out that the drive will not be used much. <br />Duray indicated that he can understand the concerns being expressed by <br />the Klidzejs family. However, the Public Works Department must have <br />access to the sanitary sewer line. Duray also pointed out that the Public <br />Works Director feels that the proposal for underlayment with topsoil and <br />grass over it is a workable solution. <br />Klidzejs asked if it would be the responsibility of the City to maintain the <br />grass and make sure it says green. The City Planner suggested that the <br />homeowner wou]d be responsible for this. However, if the City damages <br />the area in accessing the sewer line, then the City would do the necessary <br />restoration. <br />Klidzejs pointed out that there are other access areas along the lake for the <br />sewer line. She asked if the City would be installing underlayment and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.