Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JULY 13, 2000 <br />been, he would have suggested that access from LaBore Road was the <br />most practical from both an accessibility standpoint as well as to maintain <br />existing vegetation along Keller Parkway. <br />Keis pointed out that when the new home is constructed, it will be <br />necessary to remove alot of the existing vegetation on the property. <br />Beetman reported that this is true for the high portion of the lot, but not for <br />the low portion as it abuts Keller Parkway. Beetman pointed out that to <br />provide access via Keller Parkway, the driveway would have to be very <br />large due to the grades of the property resulting in removal of a great deal <br />of vegetation. <br />Keis asked if the lot could be split differently to accommodate the Keller <br />Parkway access. <br />Beetman described the property and the lot split, and noted that the <br />existing driveway from LaBore Road could be moved about 15 feet from <br />adjacent property lines as well as fencing and screening installed. Another <br />option would be to put a large addition on the existing home and sell the <br />new lot. <br />Eric Netteberg, 636 LaBore Road, appeared before the Commission and <br />submitted a letter from his wife dated July 12°i in opposition to the <br />variance. Netteberg pointed out that the Code requires that lots have <br />direct access on a public road. This particular lot has access via Keller <br />Parkway. Netteberg pointed that the Code provides a specific list of <br />reasons for granting a variance, and homeowner preference is not on that <br />list of reasons. Netteberg indicated that if the lot is not buildable, then the <br />subdivision should not have been granted in the first place. <br />Netteberg indicated that his specific objections to the variance include the <br />added traffic that would occur adjacent to his property by allowing the <br />shared access from LaBore Road. Netteberg also questioned whether that <br />access was adequate for emergency vehicles. Netteberg pointed out that <br />the driveway is 3 feet off his property line and having a driveway of this <br />nature serving two homes would effect his property value. <br />Keis noted that hardships can be based on the physical layout of the land. <br />Keis did not believe asingle-family home would generate a huge amount <br />of traffic, but agreed there will be increased traffic to some degree. <br />Netteberg pointed out that there is currently a significant amount of traffic <br />to and from the existing home at 666 LaBore Road. <br />