Laserfiche WebLink
Special D;teeting ~ September 27, 1955 <br />Commissioner that, tax forfeited property within its boundaries be <br />withheld from public sale for municipal purposes. <br />Upon motion by Nadeau, seconded by Spooner, it was <br />"ItL5OLVh1), That the County Land Commissioner <br />be requested to withhold from sale the property <br />described in t. he foregoing resolution as dowered <br />by water of Savage Lake,." <br />fiyes - 5 Nays - 0 <br />"Che resalution vras adopted, <br />The Mayor l:>oint.ed out that the principal purpose of this <br />speci.ai nree,ting was to decide how liquor should be dispensed in the <br />Village of Little Canada. The various members of the Council dis- <br />cussed at length the opinions given by members of the public who ap-• <br />pearcd at the hearir.y on September 20, 1955. It appeared from the <br />records of:' that meeting that; the persons present who favored the es- <br />tablishment of a municipal liquor store were verycefinitely in the <br />minority. Council members, upon being polled by the Clerlc as to <br />whether or not they have had any further cornmunicat.ions from the pub- <br />7.ic generally or from any particular citizens on this subject of <br />liquor since the September 20th meeting, all answered in the negative, <br />The Mayor, however, stated that. he had received one anonymous letter <br />stating that a conmrittee of thirty-three citizens of the Village were <br />extending their appreciation for having had an opportunii:y t.o present <br />views t.o the Councii at the September 20th meeting and that they urge <br />the establishment of a municipal Liquor store. No names were included <br />in the communication nor did anyone sign it. It was the general con- <br />sensus of the Councii that the anonymous communication was relatively <br />worthless. The Council went into the development of figures for the <br />purpose of.' tryir;g to ascertain whether or not a municipal liquor store <br />could succeed i.n the Village. It developed that at the present time <br />the Viila.ge treasury is in good condition having a cash balance of <br />approximately ${20,000 and that the budget for the ensuing year had <br />been adopted providing for a general tax levy of ~j;B,500, the same <br />amount as for tyre preceding year, It vans pointed out by some of the <br />Council members that any effort to put: tfae Village in business at <br />this time would require the expenditure of a sum at least three times <br />that, of the existing cash balance and possibly a greater arnourrt. The <br />Council generally felt that by, going into business and investing many <br />thousands of dollars, the ultimate possibility of tax benefit to the <br />local citizens could not be, more than the present taxes or $(£3,500 per <br />year. It was estitrat.ed after considerable discussion,.ti~at the current <br />cost of operat.iny a:~municipal liquor store would be approximately <br />X610,000 per year. This would include estimatedsal.aries, rent and all <br />other incidental expenses. In order to ma1Te a gross prof'iC of X610,000 <br />it would be necessary to have gross sales during the year of y{150,000. <br />Only after gross sales of~150,000 had been reached would it be possi- <br />ble to ma.lse any net profit which would accrue to tl~e benefit of taxm <br />payers. Hy selling an additional V6.50,000 worth of liquor the operation <br />could conceivably net $~>10',000. If, on the other hand, the operation was <br />not successful, and there were plenty of examples to substantiate the <br />fact that sv.ch a business could not break even, then and in•that. case <br />_ ~? <br />