My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-08 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
08-27-08 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:19:07 PM
Creation date
9/8/2008 2:27:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 27, 2008 <br />comments are specific to definitions related to day care, group facilities, <br />and family. <br />The City Attorney discussed Fair Housing Act issues related to the <br />definition of family and day care regulations as outlined in his August 26, <br />2008 report. Given statutorily protected uses related to the "family" issue, <br />it was the recommendation of the City Attorney that the definition of <br />"family" be eliminated and that occupancy rates be governed by the Fire <br />Code. <br />The Council had an extensive discussion related to this issue. It was noted <br />by the City Administrator that most complaints with rental properties with <br />high occupancy rates relate to parking issues. The City Attorney <br />suggested that these issues could be addressed under the nuisance <br />ordinance or parking ordinances. The Attorney indicated that ordinances <br />that hold up in court are those that can be applied evenly, and again <br />indicated that defining "family" is likely to run afoul of the Fair Housing <br />Act. <br />McGraw asked if the Fire Code applied difference occupancy standards <br />depending on the type of house, i.e., single-family, townhome, <br />condominiums. The City Attorney was not sure and thought that <br />occupancy rates were based on a number of issues including square <br />footage, number of bedrooms, etc. <br />The City Administrator suggested that the City's parking regulations be <br />reviewed to ensure that property owners are required to accommodate the <br />parking of all vehicles for people living in a dwelling off-street. He again <br />noted that parking generates the bulk of the complaints for properties with <br />high occupancy rates. Stricter parking regulations and the Fire Code <br />should accomplish what the City is trying to do. <br />McGraw asked about parking regulations for large multi-tenant buildings. <br />Blesener suggested that posting surrounding streets as no-parking would <br />help address parking issues. The City Administrator noted that the Code <br />requires a minimum number of parking sports per unit. Problems arise, <br />however, when parking is taken up by boats, RV's, junk vehicles, etc. <br />McGraw asked if the City Code could limit the number of vehicles <br />allowed per unit. The City Attorney thought that could be done. He <br />indicated that problems occur when cities write local ordinances that deal <br />with people's access to housing. The City Attorney recommended that if <br />complaints deal with numbers of vehicles, traffic, and parking, then the <br />City could write codes to address those issues rather than codes that deal <br />with the occupancy of housing. McGraw felt that codes dealing with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.