My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-08 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
09-24-08 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:44:25 PM
Creation date
10/1/2008 9:23:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 <br />a Text Amendment would be necessary to allow a business owner to store <br />his/her own recreational equipment. <br />Montour pointed out that he did not feel it would be appropriate to allow a <br />restaurant owner, as an example, to park his/her recreational equipment in <br />the parking lot. Montour pointed out that the type of outdoor storage <br />allowed in the I-1 District by CUP is meant to be related to the principal <br />business. Montour pointed out all the work that has been done clarifying <br />the outdoor standards in the I-I District, and pointed out that the Ryan <br />Industrial Park property owners participated in the process. Montour <br />indicated that the City does not get a lot of hobbyists purchasing industrial <br />property from which to practice their hobby. The City's industrial <br />properties are meant to be properties from which viable businesses can <br />operate, bringing in jobs and providing services for the community. <br />Montour felt that if Lillemoen wanted to operate from an industrial <br />property, he should obtain a major auto repair license. He also suggested <br />that if the consensus is to allow Lillemoen to store his personal <br />recreational equipment at the site, then a Text Amendment would be in <br />order. <br />Stanke indicated that he has his own recreational equipment stored on his <br />Ryan Industrial Park property. Stanke stated that his issue was raised by <br />the Ryan Industrial Park property owners in the workshops that were held <br />with the City Council. <br />The City Administrator reported that there may be property owners in <br />Ryan Industrial Park with existing CUPS for outdoor storage that include <br />recreation equipment or vague outdoor storage provisions. The City is <br />now operating under a revised outdoor storage code, and Mr. Lillemoen is <br />subject to this revised code. <br />McGraw pointed out that Lillemoen is asking for things that are not <br />recognized by the City's Code, and pointed out that Mr. Stanke may have <br />things that were granted to him over time prior to the new Code being <br />adopted. McGraw stated that this does not mean that Mr. Lillemoen is <br />entitled to the same things that other property owners received approval <br />for in the past. <br />Keis noted that when anyone purchases a piece of property it is their <br />responsibility to do their due diligence to determine what is allowed on the <br />property and what uses it can be put to. <br />Stanke suggested that the Council amend the Code to allow for the <br />hobbyist use. Allan pointed out that the alternative to opening industrial <br />property up to hobbyist uses is for Lillemoen to obtain a major auto repair <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.