Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 26, 2009 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Boss. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />IMP. NO.2009-09 Blesener opened the public hearing to consider the improvement of <br />& 2009-IO - Westwind Drive and Windrow Drive by mill and overlay of bituminous <br />WESTWIND surface as well as concrete curb and gutter repairh•eplacement. <br />AND <br />WINDROW The City Engineer reviewed the existing road conditions and noted that <br />DRIVES based on those conditions a mill and overlay of both streets is being <br /> proposed to re-establish the crown. Approximately 1" of the edges of the <br /> street will be milled off tapering toward the center of the street. The street <br /> will then be overlaid with bituminous. Some street patching may be <br /> necessary in areas of worst deterioration. There will be minor curb repair <br /> and replacement of badly damaged curb sections to improve curb <br /> drainage. The Engineer noted that given the level of oil prices as well as <br /> the bidding environment, it is felt that very favorable bids will be received <br /> for this work. <br />The Engineer then reviewed the City's Assessment Policy relative to mill <br />and overlay projects, noting that 50% of the cost is assessed to benefitting <br />properties with the City paying the remaining 50% of the project. The <br />Engineer noted that the total estimated cost of the project is $271,000.00. <br />The residential assessment rate is $18.98 per front foot. <br />The Engineer then reviewed the proposed project schedule should the <br />project move forward. He noted that the proposed assessment roll is also <br />included for property owners' review. <br />The Engineer then reviewed an issues list supporting why City staff feels <br />that the project should move forward. That listing included information <br />on the competitive bidding environment, oil prices, the fact that the City is <br />maintaining the assessment rate at 20081evels, the fact that this <br />assessment rate has been artificially suppressed for a number of years <br />given it has been inflated by 3% annually when the market increases have <br />been over 6% from 1996-2006, and that interest rates are at a very <br />favorable level. <br />The City Administrator noted the interest rates that the City has utilized <br />over the past five year period. He pointed out that if bonds were sold <br />today, the City would utilize an interest rate of 4.75% for a ten year <br />assessment, which is below the rates charged for the past five years. The <br />Administrator presented a sample assessment calculation comparing a 6% <br />interest rate and a 4.75% interest rate, noting an approximately $130 <br />savings in interest over a 10 year assessment period. Another option <br />