My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-04-09 Parks Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-04-09 Parks Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2009 7:46:35 AM
Creation date
6/9/2009 7:46:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTF,S <br />Parks & Recreation Commission <br />June 4, 2009 <br />Morelan stated that the area west of the walking path is normally a wet area. Sullivan asked if <br />the backstop could be removed and a ball field be relocated within the park. Sanders commented <br />that he thought the ball field could be relocated in another area and that the basketball court be <br />placed around the area where the second base for the ball field is now. <br />Chair Pahey asked if this was a practical project that we should be recommending acid liked the <br />idea that the project was recommended to this commission by kids. Sanders thought the project <br />is one that should be pursued, especially if it includes the improvement of the current equipment <br />in the park. <br />Slain inquired as to the recommended size of the court. Sanders thought the size would normally <br />be 50' by 50', but it could be constructed smaller if desired. Slain also thought the height of the <br />hoop could be lowered to 9' high to deter older kids from invading the court. The age group <br />that would be ideal for the 9' height would be age 12 or under. <br />SteinerY recommended Sanders map out a couple different locations where the court could be <br />built for the commission to review at the next meeting. Sanders agreed to design the map with a <br />few location recommendations. <br />Maida stated if the court was built around the current baseball second base area that there would <br />still be ample park area for other sports. <br />Lohnaugh asked what the timeline would be for starting this project. Sanders thought next year <br />would be a good target if the budgeting could be approved fora 2010 construction. Morelair <br />thought if this commission put the Thunder Bay Park project as a top priority it could possibly be <br />approved in time for next year's budget. <br />Sullivan asked if there were other items needed for the park if the court was to be constructed <br />such as restrooms acid benches. Morelan thought benches would be useful, but a bathroom <br />would probably not be a consideration. <br />Slain questioned if the other property owners that did not respond to the Quest of Power's survey <br />should be contacted. Sanders and Morelan both thought it would be best to design a plan first <br />before approaching the neighborhood with a suggested meeting. Sullivan thought it would be a <br />good idea to also invite the Quest for Power members to the neighborhood meeting once a date <br />was set. <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.