My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-09 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-22-09 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2009 1:25:11 PM
Creation date
7/2/2009 1:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 22, 2009 <br />Mark Kronbeck, Alliance Engineering, reviewed the proposed parking <br />lay-out noting that two temporary parking stalls have been added in the <br />area of the property that would eventually provide an access point to Lot <br />2. Kronbeck noted that these two par]<ing stalls would be eliminated at the <br />time that Lot 2 is developed and the connection made between the two <br />lots. However, once Lot 2 is developed there would be a shared parking <br />agreement between Lots I and 2. <br />The City Administrator reported that there have been discussions with <br />both Sweet Cream Enterprises and Sherman Associates relative to a <br />reciprocal parking agreement. I-Ie recommended that the shared parking <br />agreement be a permanent agreement. Steve Sparks, Sweet Cream <br />Enterprises, stated that it is his understanding that there will be a <br />permanent shared parking agreement. Sparks stated that the only caveat is <br />that the City Council would determine whether that shared parking would <br />continue at the time that Lot 2 develops. Blesener noted that if Lot 2 does <br />not develop for a year or two, there will be history as to Culvers' parking <br />needs that the Council could use in determining whether or not the shared <br />parking agreement needed to remain in place. <br />Sparks explained that in addition to the two temporary spaces provided at <br />a futm•e access point to Lot 2, there are also three spaces provided at a <br />second future access point. Therefore, there is the potential of five of the <br />Culvers' parking spaces disappearing once Lot 2 develops. <br />Blesener asked for clarification of the two pylon signs proposed on the <br />Culvers' property. Sparks noted that one pylon would be for Culvers and <br />the second would be for the business that develops on Lot 2, but located <br />on the Culvers property along Rice Street. It was noted that the Planning <br />Commission recommended that should the two pylons be approved on Lot <br />1, giving Lot 2 Rice Street signage exposure, that a pylon would not be <br />allowed on the Lot 2 property. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by Keis, seconded by McGraw, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Mr. McGraw introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTIONNO. 2009-6-.I39-APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY <br />AND FINAL PLATS FOR THE VILLAGE SQUARE THIRD <br />ADDITION SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE <br />RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY PLANNER, CITY <br />ENGINEER, PLANNING COMMISSION, RAMSEY COUNTY, AND <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.