Laserfiche WebLink
;~iii~ iJ'1'1sS <br /> C:Lty council <br /> (Cont~d,) <br /> Iebruary 13, 1880 <br /> rArs, caa.ze stated that perhaps the i'arlc Cornznission sYrould he reduced <br /> .from nine members to seven rrierdoers, Councilulan DeBace stated bhat he <br /> tnoutht che.re would be Aro problen~i doing this, <br /> I~rs. Sca.ze introduced the £ollowinl; resolution and moved :its adoptiono <br /> 'if~S~'LU'i:COi~ iVO, .iC)-2-~11 - luiLtCliliVG Tl""G OIU) iD„iVCJ3 t'C iZli1)UCi:; <br /> TIII~ iTLs 0.'' iiE Y~1:tK COt•S~itSSIG;`J F~li0r1 IdJi1t Iii i-:ii3ii~R.S `1.0 :ii?V~Cd <br /> i~kE„l~;:kvS i1kVli DECi,i1.!cLIHC. ';liE1T A t~U01ZUi~ OF 1'iJli :k'AI{[( GUi~l[~ll:>S.COPv <br /> :d:CLh COiti51:S1' Ul' I~CU~ 1?;I'-i3~}iS !\Ell IC;`ZT'riliEt 1A4~;D;1)IiIC'; TJ.fi~ <br /> C;itDLldAiv(,r., 'IG i),tOV.(;~r _"IIx~1 7Hx, YAxZK COi-IA''A.LN~A.LO~ I~AaAaUI!,It£; <br /> SciA.LL iZ1;CIs:f.V1; .fi S.1L),:ZY ikICC4i `,lI,L iii' SE'i B.Y. COIJitiGIL F.;`L;SCLUTICIi <br /> 'hC foretoi.ng :resolut:ion was duly ,>ecorAdecl by J.'~x, ?~ahe~y, <br /> Ayes (5) Scalze, Fahey, iianson9 Yiehace9 harieau, <br /> Id2.yes (Ci), <br /> Resolution declared adolrted, <br /> 'Phis resolution appears ixr Resolution Soon Igo, 6, Page 51, <br /> !''x~ee Remova:L The t'ittorney reported that he has rev~..ewed the tree removal contract <br /> Contrac'c submitted by kIaynes Tree lervice, '1'kre ittorney stated that kre can <br /> determine no uniformity in krow t-1r, Haynes arrived a't "bkAe prices for <br /> removing the various sizes o:f trees, Attorney i'a,rks stated "that <br /> another area, that he questioned in tkre t>id was the cost of socldint;. <br /> r, F'ia,yxAes is charging 3111.x,00 per yard for pl.acirAg sod, <br /> Attorney Yaxzs stated that he would Bite to review these :items with <br /> yir. , raynes before the L'ouncil accepts t'rre contract, <br /> 1`.lre Attorney also stated that lie wou:rd be going over the C:i.ty~ s <br /> bidd:i.ng :for,ns tiro see i:E' they can be improved upon, <br /> Condorninuxn 'rhe Attorney reported that the State LeC;islature is considering <br /> <br /> G.rda.nanoe leE;;islation which i.1' passed could render the Condondn:ium Crd:i.nance <br /> the City is consicierink sor adoption nul:L and void, The :Let <br /> _ASlature <br /> is considering a iJnii'orm Condomi.xAi.urn t1.ct rahich has a clause in it <br /> :which w:i.1J prevent couarAUnities From makinE; any more restr:icti:ve <br /> ordinances ooveri.nt condominiur~nstha.Aa exist in -the ;;tote law, <br /> `i~he Attorney recently testified at a hearixzF~ pointirre~ out that <br /> Little Canada tainted. some contro:l.s over condominiums and that Little <br /> Canada cans opposed to this clause .i.n the Oni£orm Cortdorniniurn Act, <br /> There *aere also severa:[ other, peok>le at tkris hear.:ing 'testifyint against <br /> the c:l.ause, <br /> i'ire Attorney is sug'r;esting; "that the C:ty 'table action on their proposed <br /> condornini.wn ordinance until. tire; Si;ate l;egislaiure acts on "the Uniform <br /> Condorniniwu Acte <br /> <br />