Laserfiche WebLink
i~'i11dU'IS`3S <br /> C:l.ty Council <br /> (Cont~d,) <br /> <br /> Pe'bruary 13, 19II0 <br /> A'ransCer zvrr. fa.kzey introduced 'the :f.'ola.owing reso:l.utio:n and snowed ~.ts adopta.on; <br /> Oi' <br /> k~.evenue tTsSO,U`IlON TQO. 80-.2--93 M AP:i'RO'VIDI( 111E Tu111';I~EIt OF 1980 <br /> ShartnF; IZtV1;P•ii)i^+; SIAi~CidG i~'UNDS "::1~I 'i'I:E; .(ll~iOUldT O:t' 510~3~!3,00 1~r.ZCP <br /> funds 'i'll: alC1S7' IzD1D AGliiCY Y'DIdI) '1'0 'Pti'is CliN :).i,:1L I~'U)D <br /> `.'r.'lLe i'cregoingresolut:i.oxz z~ras duly seconded by P4r, Ila.nson. <br /> zlyes lrahey9 Ilanson9 :OeFlace' I6`adeeu9 Scalze, <br /> Idayes (0). <br /> ftesoLution declared adopted, <br /> This r°esoLUtion appears in lieso:iution i;ook i~1o, b' Page 57. <br /> Planning `ihe Attorney sta:be<7 that he has rc'vieL~red tkze 'Planning' Service Contract <br /> Service i'or tho Cityr s Cornprehezzsivc Plan that was subrn:itted b5'' itiorthwes~b <br /> Contract Associated Consultants, 7"ne Attorney outlined the Follocaing xevi.sions <br /> Cornprehens:ive "bkza"i; shou].c.'i be made in the contract beFore the City approves ita <br /> x~18xz <br /> On pa.gc; 2 of. the contract under paragraph 1), PNOJItiC7.' SC[IE:DU-T1'~~ the <br /> ~',ttorney stated 'tkzat the two year. tune period could be misinte:cpreted <br /> to mean that tine Planner. has two year. s to comp:i.ete the Corn, rehensi've <br /> 1'.I.a.n, Counca.lsnan Iie,iiaCe S"ta GGd tnat he was n0't COrlCerned wl."tl1 tkll5 <br /> as 'lshe Cray kzas the pohror to terminate the contract at any time. <br /> Under paragraph I~', COST OT' Srs1iVTC~S 7., s the attorney sug€;es'ted that <br /> tkzc; zrord ~~herea,F"ter'~ sllolilcl be changed to ~lhereinai`ter" and. under <br /> I' , C05T OF SP]ItV7:C1bS 3. the attorney :is sugges tirzp; that the last <br /> sentence be deleted as tkzere is no reason for this sentence, <br /> On page 3, paragraph ji', COST Olr 5131~VICLS 1!„ the z~rord '~costs° shoua.d <br /> be added to the end of the paragraph. 1'1'ze aatornoy also stated that <br /> paragraph Il, is too vague as it refers to para~;raplz G9 and should <br /> probably refer to paragraph G Unde.-c paragraph 7:, the word <br /> u.renegotia:ce~~ is not the proper taord, and the tattorney stated that <br /> there is no xzegotiation of the tex2ns o£ the contract and su}~;es'ts <br /> another word be used, <br /> I4r, Fahey introduced the i`.ollot~ring .resolutiior. and moved i"ts adoption: <br /> 1?:SC],UTlOIV N0, 80W2m911 - A:t'PRCVIdG `!'NL PI;ADiD1IIdG S ktVIC^, <br /> COiQ'xi;'zCI' T~OIt I'k?E; Cl`i`".C'S CCAII?R`~HsI,NSLVIIJ PL1iD ii'Tl PIO t7li-isS'P <br /> x.uSOC:I ~.`C"SD COtJSULT.R11'~TS COvTING1Pd'P UPOAI 7.'ii;5 I~+.:CCi-II?'e'NllA`P:I:CbIS <br /> OJ' `ttli A`I'"I'O}jt\!;'~:Y k'J'aCJ.1tl1):C11G `kf; [u'~V:l:i.IONS CtI I'r'e CGi\'i't~i1C1.' ;3u <br /> I~'OLLOrc;ll <br /> 'i'lze Foregoing resolution was duly seconded by i'ar, iiaxzson, <br /> Eyes (5) P'ahey, 1lanson9 ;~eBace, Scal.ze9 idadeau, <br /> IVayes (0), <br /> ;Z.esolut:ion declared adopted, <br /> Tkzis resolution appears in ftesolutian Eoolr No, b, .rage 5II. <br /> rage .-21,,- <br /> <br />