Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTES <br /> City Council <br /> June 25, 1980 <br /> Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 80-6-234 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING <br /> ON THE PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE <br /> The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. <br /> ayes (4) Fahey, Hanson, Scalze, DeBace. <br /> Nayes (0). <br /> Resolution declared adopted. <br /> This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 6, Page 148. <br /> Councilman DeBace stated that he would vote in favor of adopting the <br /> new Zoning Ordinance, but he was not 100% satisfied with the new Ordinance. <br /> DeBace stated he had some concerns with the definitions of the new <br /> zoning districts. <br /> The City Clerk indicated that the Council would have to indicate which <br /> version of pages 18 and 19 the Council would like included in the new <br /> Zoning Ordinance. The City Planner submitted to the Council two <br /> versions of pages 18 and 19 of the Ordinance. The difference between <br /> the two versions dealt with the distance a fence could be erected from <br /> a property line. <br /> Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION N0. 80-6-235 - ADOPTING THE ZONING ORDINANCE <br /> WITH THE FIRST DRAFT OF PAGES 18 AND 19 WHICH DELETE TEIE <br /> PROVISION OF NOT ALLOWING A FENCE TO BE BUILT CLOSER THAN <br /> TFIREE FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE <br /> The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br /> Ayes (4) Fahey, Scalze, Hanson, DeBace. <br /> Nayes (0 <br /> Resolution declared adopted. <br /> This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 6, Page 149. <br /> Mr. Nielson stated that he would be making some minor changes in the <br /> boundary lines on the zoning map. Councilman DeBace stated that the <br /> City Clerk or City Attorney could help the Planner with these changes. <br /> The Planner stated that he would probably use the Section Maps to make <br /> these changes. These Section Maps should be the official City record. <br /> Councilman Fahey stated that he would like it reflected in the minutes <br /> that the Council took no action whatsoever on rezoning any properties <br /> and the zoning map referred to is only for discussion purposes and is <br /> not the official zoning map of tY~e City. <br /> The City Planner informed the Council that his office received a letter <br /> objecting to the suggested down-zoning of the property along Ruth Street. <br /> The property is presently zoned R-3 and the Zoning Ordinance is suggesting <br /> it be zoned R-1. <br /> Page -3- <br /> <br />