Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTES <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> September 8, 1980 <br /> A resident of Schletty Woods requested that the Council put it into <br /> the minutes that it was their opinion that the double-fronting lots, <br /> specifically, Lots 1 through 6, Block 2, Schletty Woods Addition, <br /> are located on Schletty Drive and not Little Canada Road. <br /> Councilman DeBace stated that even if the Council made this statement, <br /> a future Council could overturn that statement. <br /> It was stated that there is a 20 foot easement along Little Canada Road <br /> on the back of Lots 1 through 6, Block 2 that was supposed to eliminate <br /> this problem. <br /> Councilman Fahey informed the residents of Schletty 4loods that the Council <br /> cannot control what the County does. Little Canada Road is a County Road, <br /> and if the County made improvements to Little Canada Road, the City cannot <br /> control how the County would assess these improvements. Fahey did state, <br /> however, that the County would have to prove that the property was <br /> benefited by the improvement it would be assessing. <br /> Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION N0. 80-9-328 - APPROVING AND ADOPTING TfIE <br /> ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR IMPROVEMF..NT NO. "/8-10, AUDITOR'S <br /> IMPROVEMENT N0. 78-6, AUD. N0. 1809, D/P N0. 1809 FOR LOTS <br /> 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, SCHLETTY WOODS ADDITION AND THE REMAINING <br /> INVOLVED PROPERTY OWNERS ON LITTLE CANADA ROAD, INTEREST: <br /> 10%, INSTALLMENTS: 15 YEARS <br /> The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Flanson. <br /> 1\yes (5) Fahey, Hanson, Scalze, Nadeau, DeBace. <br /> Nayes (0). <br /> Resolution declared adopted. <br /> This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 6, Pages 212 and 213. <br /> Mayor Hanson stated that Council would now discuss that part of Improvement <br /> No. 78-10 that extends along Edgerton Street from Little Canada Road to County <br /> Road 6-2. <br /> Mr. Clifford Hill asked if the City was considering extending water along <br /> County Road 6-2 or Viking Drive in the future. The Mayor stated that <br /> in October the Council will be considering a petition for watermain and <br /> storm sewer along County Road B-2. <br /> Mr. FIi11 asked if the City had a time limit in which he must connect to <br /> City water. The Mayor informed him that Mr. Hill does not have to connect <br /> if he does not wish to. Mr. Hi11 asked the Council if his well needed <br /> to be replaced, could he replace it or would he have to hook up to City <br /> water. The Mayor informed Mr. Hi71 that he could replace his well and <br /> would not have to hook up to the watermain. <br /> Page -6- <br /> <br />