Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />January 1~, 1981 <br />Mr. Forsberg stated that the P7anning Commission is recommending that <br />the City obtain the tax forfeited property, but not use it as a park. <br />Mrs. Nardini that if the City considers this property for senior citizen <br />housing, it should be aware that this property is just as close to shopping <br />as the property it ha.d considered off of Jackson and Little Canada Road. <br />The City Clerk informed the Council that if the City accepts the property <br />and intends to use it for senior citizens, the City must pay a11 State <br />and Federal liens against the property. If the property is used for <br />park or open sapce, the City does not have to pay anything. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. II1-1-36 - AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO <br />OBTAIN FROM THE COUNTY ANY LIEN INFORMATION THAT EXISTS <br />ON THE TAX fORFEITED PROPERTY ON T~dIN LFlKE BLVD. KNOWN <br />AS PARCEL #53-03110-020-55 AND PARCEL #53-03110-030-55 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. <br />~yes (5) Scalze, Hanson, Fahey, Forsberg, Nardini. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 20. <br />Approval Mr. Hanson stated that the Council is approving the vouchers by a new <br />Of The procedure. A71 checks other than payroll will not be issued until the <br />Vouchers Council approves the vouchers. All checks were written prior to Council <br />approval in the past. <br />Mr. Forsberg intruduced the following resolution and moved its acloption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 81-1-37 - APPROVING PAYP4ENT OF THE <br />VOUCHERS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. <br />/{yes (5) Forsberg, Hanson, Nardini, Scalze, Fahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 20. <br />Frattalone The Attorney informed the Council that Shafer Construction's insurance <br />Claim company has refused to pay the Frattalone claim. The City has been <br />withholding $132.00 from Shafer Construction until the claim is resolved. <br />The C~ty Clerk asked if State aid money could be withheld from the <br />City because the City has not fully paid one of its contractors. <br />Mr. Forsberg suggested that the City pay Shafer the money it owes <br />them and let Mr. Frattalone solve the matter himself. <br />Mr. fahey stated that if the contractor did not give Mr. Frattalone <br />the correct fill, the city is involved, <br />Page -12- <br />