Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-08-81 Council Minutesi~i1ldUTliS OF TiiE N:L.iiULAR 3~1k,i:,TIN(i Ci2'Y COUNCII. LITTLI~, CANADA' MZVNESOTA Yursuant to due call and notice thereof a regu:tar meeting of the Council of the City of Little Canada, aNinnesota was held on the Sth day of April, 1981 in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City, Ilpril 89 1981 The Mayor, itiir. kZa;ymond Hanson' chaired and called the meeting to order at 7;30 P.AtiI, NiE:htt3ENFi PT~liSi!;NT; iiayor Councilrnan Counci:iman Councilwoman Councilwon~an rir. Raymond Hanson i~ir. Michael I~'ahey N;r. Dennis P'orsberN Mrs. Mugs Nardini Ntrs, Beverly Scalze AliSO PRFSENT: City Clerk Clty Attorney City isngineer City Planner i3ecording Secretary I;r. Joseph Chlebeck Mr, Ciayton 1'arks i~,r. Donald Carley rTr. Brad Nielson I~"irs, Kath].een Glaszzer Ap~roval l~irs. Scalze introduced the following resolutiott and moved its adoptiona Of' The P4inutes I~:SOLU`.CION N0. tS:l-4-11~6 - APPROVING 'PHli NiINUTES OF THli I~'iARCH , 9 SPECIAL COUNCiL tfiSETING AiUll THr~ r1INUTES OP' THE NiARCH 11, 1981 HLGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The foregoing rescu.ution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini, Ayes (5) Scalze, Nardini, Hanson, Fahey, Porsbexg, Nayes (0). Ftesolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution S3ooic IVo, 7, Yage 95, Public t~iayor Hanson opened the pubiic hearing on the request of Yorkton Hearing lleveloptnent for a~roperty division and a conditzonal use perrnit Ycrrkton for dual driveways, t~ir, ffanson stated that rir. Lee of Yorkcor~ Conditional Deve~opment did not appear at the Ylanning Commission rneeting at Use Yerrait which this item was schedu:ied, therefore, the Council would hold the & Yroperty public hearizxg tonight, but table actzon on the request unti.l the Division Ylanning Corrurussion has ~sz opportunity to review the raatter. N1r, Larry liee inf'ormed the Counci:t that he would like to deve:io~ three additiorael bui.ldings in the industrial parlc on Soutki pwasso Blvd, i~ir, liee also stated that Yorkton Development has resolved tho access problems which were pointed out in a recent Ylanner~s report, A~1rs, Scalze asxed [~3r. Lee why there is a triangular piece of property extending into the R-1 zoned property in this area. Mr. Lee xeplied that this pieee of property is a part of the industrial zoned property, Also this porti.on of property is intended to remaia~ green area. kage -.1.- i~1INUTliS Gity Council Apri:L 8' 1981 P+Ir, Forsberg asked 1~ir. Lee his intentions for the development of the R-1 property in this area which he owns, i~lr. Lee re~lied that he is considexing developing industrial buildings on this property, The Council pointed out to Mr. Lee that th~ neighbors in the area would not go along with the rezoning of any R 1 property to industrial. t+ir. F'ahey expressed coracern that the ~ouncil previously approveq the development of i~lr. Lee~s tract C with the biacktop right up to the residentially zoned area. F'ahey f'elt that any screenixig from residentiai property should be on l;he industrial portion o£ the ~roperty. There was no one else present wishing to spealc on the Yorkton Development proposai. 1lrs. Nardini introduced the following resolution and ;aoved its adoption; RESOLUTION N0. 81-l~-1lt7 - CLUSIiVG 2'Hli kUBI,lC HEARING ON THE YOS3KTON DEVELOPNItiNT I~~UEST FOR A YROYERTY DIVI5IUN AND CONDTTIOIQAli U5L YERt'4IT F'Ofi DUAL llItIVE4JAY5 The foregoing xesolution was duly seconded by Nirs, Scalze. Ayes (5) Nardini, Scalze, Hanson, Forsber~9 Fahey. Nayes (0), I~.eso:Lution declared adopted. `i'his resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Yage 96. Nirs, Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption; HESOLUTIO~' N0. 8:1.-I~-1L~8 - TABLING AC`PION ON THE YORiSTON DEVELOPMFNT ftE:~UE51' FOR A PROYER'PY DIVISI0II AND A CONDI'PIONAL USE Pli1i~~IIT FOR DUAli llRIVEi~AYS The foregoing resoiution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. Ayes (5) Scalze, Hanson, Naxdini, Fahey, F'orsberg. Nayes (0). Reso:l.uti.on declared adopted, This resolution appears a.n Resolution k3ook I~o. 7~ Page 96, Public i~Ir, Larry Lee of Yorkton Development appeared before the Council Fiearing requesting preliminary approval £or i.ndustrial revenue bonds in the Xorkton amount of ~2,205,000 for the industrial buildings he intends to Deve:Lopcnent develop in Yorkton Industrial Yark. Industrial Revenue The City attorney stated that he reviewed the documents in question Eonds and they apyear to be in order. Tk~ere was no one present objecting to the approval ot' these industria'1 bonds, Yage ..2- aKINUTk~S City Council Apri1 fl, 1981 i`9s~. k'ahey introduced the followit~g resolution and rnoved its adoptionq RtiSOLU`i'SON N0. 81-1~-1k9 - CI,OSING THE PUBT.IG HPAft1NG ON THE P:EG~UEST pF YORKTOlY llEVELOPt~NT FUk2 P1~LIMINARY APYkZOV.AL 0~ INDUSTP.tHL NBVENUE k30NDS The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by i'~1rs. I~ardini. Ayes (5) Fahey, Nardini' Hanson' Scalze, P'orsberg. Nayes (0), Ftesolution declared adopted. This resolution ap~ears in H.esolution Book No. 7, yage 9~> i~ix~. Fahey introduced the £ollowing resolution and rnoved itw adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-e;-150 -~E~CI`PING A Pft0Y05AL I~OR AN SNpUSTRIAL F'ACILITlES D~,"VELOYI~]ENT PROJECT GIVING PR~LIMINANY APPROVAL TO 2'HE 1'ROJECT PUNSUANT T~F THE i~'TINNESOTA MUNICIYA'L INDUS`PRIAL DEVELOPi°fENT ACT AUTHORI2ING ZBE SUBMTSSSON OF AN APPI,ICIITION FOR APYROVAI, OF SATD PHOJECT TO TH~; COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES 0'A' THE S'PATli OF S'ilNNESOTA AND AU`t'HOH,IZING THE PNEPA~2A`PION OF NECESSARY DOCUM"r:N'i'5 AND ~viATENSAL5 IN CONNECTION WITH SAIU T'ROJECT The foregoing resolu.tion was duly aeconded by I~lrs. Scalze, Ayes (5) F'ahey, Scalze9 Aanson, Nardini, Forsberg. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Heso.Lution Hoox No. 7, Pages 97, 98,99, a.x~d 1000 Garske 1ir, Herb (;arsxe has requested that the front footage of two of his Property lots be changed. i~ir> Garska would :like the front footage of Lot 13 Division reduced from 116 feet to 100 feet and the front footage of Lot ].l~ increased to 91 feet from 75 £eet. `1'he Czty L'ngineer stated that he did not see any problecn with this proposal. Nir, F'orsberg introduced the following resolution and moved its adoptions RESOLUTION N0. 81-Lt~151 - APPROVING THE PROYERx'Y DIVISION OF LOTS AND 149 BLOCK 2 AS REC~UES7'EA BY MR. HERB GARSK~ 'Phe foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hansonm Ayes (5) Forsberg9 Hanson9 Scalze, Nardini, Fahey, Nayes (U). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in ltesoluta.on Book No. 7' Yage 100. Page -3~ iyllIdUTES City Council April b, .i981 ~ssessment The City Engi.neex reported that an assessment reapportion for Divis ion Heapportionment i~o> 561+99 ~s in ordex, 4lssessments should be reapportioned as Division Nom fo:Llows; 56l~99 Original Assessment - 53-30000-141-02 ;~1,509.85 53-30000-151-02 None Heapportionment - 53-30000-142^02 None 53-30000-152-oz ;b~,5o9.e5. P4rs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-152 - APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT REAPYURTSOt~`~NT FOR D"tVISION N0. 56499 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by rlrs. Nardini, Ayes (5) Sca7.ze, Nardini, Hanson9 I'ahey, Forsberg, Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted> Thie resolution appears in Hesolution Book No. 7, Page 101. Senior I~layor Hanson reported that N1r< Angelo Sca~.ze has requested that has Citi2en property assessments be deferred through a senior citizen deferrment. Deferrment Angelo I~ir. t~anson introduced the following resolutiozx and moved its adoptioxza Scalze kttiSOLUTIUV N0. 81-1~-153 - APYROVING THE SENIUR CITILEN Dk~'ERRMENT 0~' ASSF:SSNiENT5 FOR ANGELO SCAL2E The foregoing reso7,ution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsber~, Ayes (5) Hanson, P'orsberg, Id~rdini~ F'ahey, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resol.ution declared adopted, This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Yage 101. Notice lulayor Hanson reportad that the Czty received a noti.ce from the Ramsey S~'rorn County lieague of Local Governments xegarda.ng a meeting they will be Ramsey holding at the Venetian ;tnn on April 15, 1981. The Couneil is also County holding a meeting on that evening, and therefore will not have a League representa'tive at the League~s meeting. I'ireman~s Mayor Hanson acknowledged receipt of the ma.nutes of the Firemanos Reli.ef Relie£ Association meetiz~g, Association Mrs, Nardini commented that the Firemanas Relief Asaociation should be sure to notify the Councilmembers who are on the Association of their meetings in the future, otherwise9 the meetings should be rehelde Page -.1~- ~INUTES City Council April 8, 1981. tlpproval Of Nlrs. Nardini introduced the following resolution and moved its ado~tions The Vouchers RESOLUTION N0. 81-4«151y -,ApPROVING PAYMENT OF TIIE VOUCHE The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by itiIr. Hanson, Ayes (5) ~ardinie Hanson, Fahey~ Forsberg, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution ap~ears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 102. P~~~l~g Councilman Fahey stated that there is a vacancy on the Ylanning Commission Commission due to the resignatiott of Dick Boss. The term is for S months, Uacancy 1'he City has received applications from the Pollowing for this vacancy: Mr. French, Mr. LaMay, and Nlx~, Davison. Counci7. voted by ballot as followsc Mr. Fa,hey voted for Ivlr. llaviso.n; Mr. Hanson voted Por i~ir. French; Mrs, Scalze voted for Mr, llavison; Mrs. Nardini voted for Nir, LaMay, and Mr. F'orsberg abstained, The City Attorney stated that an appointment to the Planning Commission can only be made by a majority vote. Therefore9 this vote by the Council cannot result in an appointment, Mr, Forsberg stated tha~ he abstained from voting because both Mr, French and i~ir, LaMay are friends of his and it was he who suggested that they seek appoa.ntment, NIr. Hanson suggested that this matter be taken up again later in the meeting. Linden Mrs, Linden~s grarzddaughter appeared before the Council requesLin~; the Yropexty division o£ i~Is~s. Linden9s property and a variance to al7.ow the garage Division on the ~roperty $a remain for one year. The City Ylanner stated that this would be a subdivision and there would be a park charge involved. Council had discussion on whether the park charge would apply to both lots, or just the newly created ~.Ots 'Phe City Planner stated that according to the Cityss Ordinance 161, the existing dwelling would receive credit for the park charge, and a park charge would only apply io the newly created lot, One of the residents of the area stated that he was opposed to the property division as the area is becoming too congested, Mayor Hanson stated that the property division meets a].1 City Codes. i~lrs. Scalze introduced thefollowing resolution and moved its adoption: RE50LUTION N0. 81-)y-155 0 CLOSING THI; PUBLIC AEARING ON THE LINDEN PRpi'ERTY DIUISION AND VARIANCE RECyUES^1 Page -5- NINUTES CITY COUNCIL april 8, 1981 'Phe foregoing resolutlon was duly seconded by i~Ir, Foxsberg. Ayes (5) Scalze' Forsberg, Hanson~ Nardini, Fahey, Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in itesolution Book No. 7' ~'age 102. The City Attorney stated that he does not believe a variance will work in the case of this garage. A variance is only used on a building to be constructed~ not on one that is already existing. A'Ltorney Parks suggested that as a condition of granting the property division Mrs. Linden should be required to enter into ara agreement to remove the garage within 12 months and in the event the property is solc~ the building would be immediatel.y removed or in the event of the death of the owner9 the estate would be responsible for x~emoval oP the garage. Parks also stated that if this was not done~the agreement should provide that tha City can remove the garage and assess tkze cost of doing so against the propertya Attorney Yarks also stated that such an agreement wilJ. carry with the pxoperty and any subsequent pro~erty owners will have to abide by it. N7r, Forsberg stated that he doesn~t agree nra.th the idea that the garage should be removed withiza one year if the property is not sold. It the ~roperty is not sold, the garage shoul.d be able to rernain as it is. iviayor Hanson stated that he wou:Ld rather See the ona year ta.me period begin at the time a building ~ermit is i.ssued for the property. Hanson felt that someone buildir~g a house could use the garage £or storage of rnateria].s during 'bhe building process. Mr. Hanson felt tha't the 3U day restriction is too harsh. Nirs. Scalze stated that the park charge for the new property should be charged at the time a building permit is issued. F'ahey again stated that the paric charge would oxily apply to the newly developed lot, Nlr, I'ahey ixitroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: aiE:SOLU~i'ION N0. 81-1y-15~ - AYYROVING THE LINllEN PROPERTY D:CVISION UPON TEIE CONDiTION THAT NiR5. LINDEN EN'i'ER 1NT0 AiV AGNEEI°iE1VT `10 Bli DRE1I~'TEll BY THE CITY ATTOHNEY ALONG TAE LIN~:S INllICAT~D }3Y THE ATTORNEY' WHICH tiJOUliD 1NCLUDE `PFIE GAk2AGE i3LItiG REMOVr:ll !n~I2'HIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE SAL~ OF THE YROPliRTY OH 1N THE ~:VENT Ok' THE DE:ATH OF THli PRESENT 0'WNER THAT THE }~:S''iATE 4JOUZD NF.T%iOVE THli GARt1GE WITHIN 30 DAYS OR REliOCATE THE GARAGE TO I`'~EET CI`t`Y GODE Rk:~2UIH~P'~.NTS IN ALL liVENTS9 AIuD IF THB; GAR,AGE IS NO'P IZ~MOV~D WITHIN ONE YEAR pR t3X APHIL b9 -~9~2, TFIli CTTY CAN HENOVL THE GARAGE AND ASSliSS THli CUSTS Uk' ittiMOVAL AGALVST THE PROPERTY OWNliH AND 1V0 BU7LD:LNG YEEtx~ilT WIT+L BE ISSUEll UNTIL SUCri 7'Tt~tE AS `PI~E GAI2AGE IS Y~tOPERLY R~LOCAT3~D OR HtiMOVEll IN ACCORllANCL+' 4dI'PH THE AG~:Ei"lENT Page -6- ~zlvo~r~s City Council April bs 1.9t3:L 'Che foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Nirs. Idarda.ni. Ayes (t~) Faheyy Nardini, Scalze, Forsberg, Nayes (1) iianson, Resolution declared adopted. This resolutlon appears in Hesolution k3ook iVom 7, Yages 103 ~ld 104. Yublic Nlr. Wayne Learnord and Nir. Marvirt i~otilineic oP ltamsey County appeared liearin~ beFore ihe Council to da.scuss Yhase A of a bike trail that the County Proposed is proposing £or Little Canada. '1'he first ~ha.se o£ tYae trait wou:Ld Bike be along Edgerton Street ~rom County Road B-2 to Little Canacia l~oad. 'Praiy A~Ir. Learnord inforrned the Council that the cost oE' Phase i~ oF the bike trail would be $120,000 with ~9~,~00 oi' this arnounc funded through ba.ke ~;rant funds and the resnaining $30,000 £unded through Ramsey County Maintenance N'unds. The second and third phases of the bike traa.l in Little Caraacla wou.l.d extend 3'rom Littye Canada. Ro3d tu Centerville Road. l~ir< Learnord explained that Ldgertion Street presetzt,J~y hz~s a 21a ioot pave~aent. ^1he bike trail would run on both sides of Edgerton Street. In building the trail9 the Coun'ty wou:Ld cut one foot froitt both sides of the street arAd then add five feet of pavement to each side the Edgerto~. l'he driving surface o£ Edgerton would remain 21~ £eet wide with four foot paved bike traila on either side of the street, The trai.ls wou].d be divided from the rest o~ the street by a white line and they would be marxed *aith a bike trail syrnbol on the pavement. Nr. Forsberg asked if the County has ever encountered safety problems wiih bike trails. ~Ir. Learnord replied that the Gounty has not had sa.fety problerrAS with the trails. I~lr. Learnord stated that the bike trail tunds are intended to promote lanes for people to travel on bikes> The trails are not intended for small children to ~lay with their biices. I~i1rs, Sca12e asked how parking wou,Ld be discouraged in the bike trails> ivir, Learnord stated that it would be up to ths City to request no parking desa.gnation £or the bike trai].s. ivir. Leaxnord stated that he saw no reason for the County F3oard to deny such a request, NLrs. Nardini poirzted ouL that there is a lot of pa2^king along Edgerton in the area of Gervais Beach. vlr. Hanson expressed concern with the present corzdition of. the pavement of' Edgerton Street and also pointed out that the City has been requesting the County to lower the speed limit on Edgerton £or the past 25 years. Mayor Hanson stated that the speed limit on Edgerton shou7.d be 30 miLes per hour> vir> liearnord stated that the existence of biice lanes will not tend to effect the speed 1i.mit, 'Ihe addiiion of the bike lanes could, howevere be a cause to have the spead limit reduced, p~e _']_ riz~u~rEs City Council April 89 1981 A resident of the area along Edgerton asked if it was intended to connect the bike trails to Lake ~halen. Mr. Zearnord replied that when the whole system is completed it would be pos:sable to get from Laice ~'halen to Stillwater by bike. A rnember of the audience stated that no parking should be mandatory in the area of the Bsach' otherwise the b9.xe trails wi7.1 not be able to be used in this area. rlr, k'orsberg asked if the guard rail will be removed in order to add the bike trmil to Ldgerton. Mr. Learnoxd replied that the guard rail will remain, and the bike trail will fit a.n, Mr. Lc~arnord also stated that any existing curbing that would have to be removed in order to construct the bike lanes will be replaced by the Couraty, Tt wi11 not be necessary to get out of the existing right-of-way in order to construct these bike lanes. Mr, Learnord also stated that there will be some stoxm sewer and ditch work done a.n the area to taKe care of drainage problems that current].y exist on Edgerton. A member of the audience asked a.f it were unusual to construct bike 7.anes on both sides of a streeta Mr, Learnord replied that it was not as bikes should move in the same direction as cars. ,Another person in the audience asxed if the mail boxes on Edgerton would have to be moved. ifir. Learnord thought that 11 the mail boxes would have to be moved. Someone expressed concern that a four-foot iaide bike lane would not be wide enough. Mr. Learnord stated that fourmfeet is within the starAdards establ9.shed for bike lanes. A member of the audience e~cpressed concexn that a£ter a few years the ba.ke lanes would be abandoned, and this was just a way to get Ldgerton Strest widened. Mr. Forsberg stated that he did not f'eel the addition of bike lanes would 'lower the speed of cars traveling on F:dgerton. Foxsberg also stated that ihe improvement o£ Edgerton Street should be considered before bike lanes are conaidered, k9r. Forsberg also felt that some- thing should be done with the drainage problems along Edgexton north oS Little Canada Road, Forsberg stated that the Couzity will not clean the ditches or culverts in this aroae Mr. Learnord stated that north o£ Little Canada Road on Ed~erton9 the County will be changixig some grading and replacing some of the culverts. This would help the drainage of the area> N1x. Forsberg asked ylr, Learnord what happened to the County~s plaa~s to lower Edgerton Street, Mr. Leaxnord stated that there has not been any serious aonsideration given to these plans due to lack of funds, Nir. Forsberg stated that Edgerton has a break-away problem due to a 20 foot conCrete mat it has under it, Mr. Learnord stated that the County replies on its Nlaintet~~.nce Departrnexit to keep this under control. Yage -8- MINUT~S Caty Council April 8, 1981. NIr, Forsberg stated that there is no way to solve this break-away prpblem without repiacing the concrete met. NIrs. Scalze stated that she won].d like to see the bike lanes in Little Canada. Scalze felt there is a hazardous situation on Edgerton with bikers. Mr. Fahey commented that the iasue concerning the condition of Edgerton is not before the Council at this time. A residexit of the area stated that he was in favor of the bike lanes as there are a lot of caxs exceedi.ng the speed limit on Edgerton. His only concern would be allowing parking in the bike lanes, This resident stated that he would not like to aee parking allowed in the bike lanes. Mr, Kotilinek of the County stated that other communitiea have received the bike lanes quite we11, The bituminous shoulders are an impxovement, Ths storm sewer work that would be done is an improvement. Mr. Kotilinek stated that as to the drainage problems on Edgertan north of Little Canada Road, perhaps it is time the City undertake a storm sewer project. Mr< ~totilinek stated that the County is not in the storm sewer business. yir. Forsberg asked the County+s plans for overlaying F;dgerton Street, Mr, 3Cotilinek stated that eventual'1y the street will be overlayed, but that he aid not know the Countyos schedule £or doing this. Mr. Koti:l.inek stated that in order £or the bike trail project to be put in9 the City must approve it. If the City does not want the bike lanes~ the County Board will dxop the issue, Mr. I,earnord also stated that the City will not have to participate in iiie £undi.ng of this project. The money comes Yrom gas tax funds and the Cowaty wi11 be using their equipment and labor. Mr. Learnord a].so sta.ted that there will be separate hearings £or Phases B and C of the project. Nlr. Forsberg asked if the City requested no parking bans along Edgerton if it wou7.d slow the bike lane project up, I~3r, Learnord stated that this issue could be considered at the same time as the bike lanes by the County Board. On the matter of the reduction in speed l:imit, the Department of Transportata.on would have to conduct a study along Edgerton. A resident asked if in the winter the whole o1' k.dgerton, including the bike trai].s would be plowed. Mr. Zearnord repl.ied that it wou:l.d. Mayor Hanson thanked Messrs.Learnord and Iiotilinek for their presentatiorae Mrs. Nardini introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESO~UTSON N0. 81-1t-157 - GLOSING THE YUBLIC HEARING pN THE PROPOSEA IIIKE TRAIL FOR EDGER`PON STt~ET F'ROM COUNTY ROAD B-2 TO LITTLE CANADA ROAU Yage -9- MINUTES City Council Flpril 8, 1981 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. Ayes (5) Nardini, Forsberg, Fahey, Hanson, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 104. Mr. Forsberg stated that he would like to see a no parking ban on the entire strip of Edgerton. Mr. Fahey stated that he would not want to lose the bike lanes for the City. Fahey felt that these lanes will protect bikers and joggers ~n the City. Fahey made the commen~t that he will not vote against the bike lanes. Mr. Forsberg suggested that the County should have been seeking Federal funding to improve Edgerton Street. Mr. Fahey asked if the City was under any time constraints to approve the project. Mr. Learnord informed the Council that the first communities submitting their approval to the State will probably get the funding for the bike lanes.Mr. Learnord stated that even if the City approved the project tonight, he could not guarantee that the City will get the funding for the project. Mayor Hanson stated that he was not 9n favor of the bike lanes until there is a better situation on Edgerton Street. Forsberg stated that the County should overlay Edgerton Street and restrict parking. Mrs. Nardini stated that the City needs bike paths. Fls to the parking problem, Nardini felt that the County will go along with the City on parking. Nardini also felt that with the addition of the bike paths, the City will have a good basis for getting the speed limit on Edgerton reduced. Two residents on Edgerton Street informed the Council that they were supporters of the bike lane proposal. Mr. Hanson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-158 - TABLING FlCTION ON PHASF A OF THE PROPOSED BIKE TRAIL FOR EDGERTON STREFT UNTIL TFIE COUNTY BOFlRD INDICATES TO THE CITY ThIE FOLLOWING WILL BE FlDDRESSED: 1. CONDITIO~! OF THE ROAD PROPER; 2. SPEED LIMIT - POSSIBLE REDUCTION fROM 40 MILES PER HOUR TQ 30 MILES PER HOUR; 3. PARKING REGULATIONS IN TFIE AREA OF RAMSEY COUNTY 6EACH; AND REQUESTING THAT MR. BOB ORTH OF TFIE RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OR HTS REPRESENTATIVE FlPPEAR BEFORE THE COUNCIL TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. Flyes (0). Mayes (5) Nanson, Forsberg> Scalze, Nardini, Fahey. Resolution denied. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 105. Page -10- MIPlUTES City Council Flpril H, 1981 Zilge & R&S Property Division Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and movecl ~ts adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-159 - APPROVING PHFlSE A OF TFIE PROPOSED BIKE TRFlIL OR EDGERTON STREET The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. ~yes (5) Sca1ze, fahey, Forsberg> Hanson, Nardini. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Pages 105 and 106. Mr. Bob Zilge and Mr. Louis Rustad appeared before the Council requesting approval of a property division and requesting a bui1ding permit. Mr. Zilge stated that one of the Planner's recommendations regarding this request was that acess be opened up firom South Owasso 61vd. to Woodlyn Flvenue. Mr. Zilge stated that he feels he has adequate access for his property. The City Engineer stated that the City should try to obta~in an easement through the McGuff property for accesspurposes. Mr. Zilge stated that there are plans for one storage building to be developed on the P, & S property. The Fngineer stated that the sewer situation cou1d remain as it is presently, but when a gravity line goes in, it should service all the property in this area. Mrs. Nard~ni pointecl out that the Planner has indicated that this is a critica1 situation that an industrial area has only one access. Mr. Zilge expressed concern that the area would get a lot of through traffic by opening up additional accesses. The Planner stated that it is not necessary that an additional road go in right away, but that the City shou7d obtain easements for the development of a road in the future. The P1anner stated that the road should go 9n wherever the City Engineer recommends it. The Engineer recommended that the road go up the midd1e of the property invo1ved, similar to the Planner's recommendation #1 in his report dated March 31, 1981. Mr. Bill Gervais stated that a road up the middle would not serve his property due to the steep incline in that area. Mr. Gervais stated that he does not feel there is an access problem in the area. Mayor Nanson indicated that a lot of this revolves around the McGuff property. Mr. Fahey suggested that the City Engineer could meet with Mr. McGuff regarding this matter. Page -11- MI~IUTES City Counci7 April 8, 1981 Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION M0. 81-~4-160 - CLOSING THE PUQLIC HEFlRING ON THE ZILGE AND R& S PROPERTY DIVISION The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini. /{yes (5) Scalze, Nardini, Hanson, Forsberg, Fahey. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This reso1ution appears in Resolution Book Mo. 7, Page 106. Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adopt9on: RESOLUTION N0. 81-a,-161 - TABLING ACTICIN ON THE ZILGE AND R& S PROPERTY DIVISION AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUEST UMTIL THE CITY ENGINEER CAN MEET WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS ALOMG THE WEST SIDE OF THE S00 LINE TRACKS TO DETF.RMINE TFIE FEASIE3ILITY OF OBTAINING FlCCFSS EASEMENTS ALONG THAT STRETCH OF ROADWAY TO CONNECT SOUTN OWFlSSO BLVD. Frank Frattalone Conditional Use Permit The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini. Ayes (5) Fahey, Nardini, Scalze, Forsberg, Hanson. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 107. Mr. Frank Frattalone appeared before the Council requesting a property division and approval of a conditional use permit for outside storage and underground fuel tanks, Mrs. Scalze asked if a park charge would be needed on this property. The attorney stated that the division is on a parcel larger than 5 acres and, therefore, it is not a subdivision and no park charge would be required. The City Clerk stated that as the parcel is larger than 5 acres, no Council approval is necessary. The City Clerk asked what the City's position would be as to the requirement that Spruce Street be extended. The C~~ty Flttorney stated that the C,ity cannot require the improvement of Spruce Street. Mr. Frattalone stated that he does not object to putting in his half of Spruce Street, the only thing he was concerned with is the timing for putting in the blacktop and finishing the cutting in of the road. Mr. Frattalone stated that the road is about 3/~4 complete as far as cutting Zn and base are concerned. Frattalone stated that Messrs. Mogren and Schrier have no immediate plans for the development of their property and they do not want to put the road in right now. Mr. Fratta.lone asked that he not be required to complete the cutting in of Spruce Street prior to the issuance of a bui7ding permit. Page -12- MINUTES City Council April 8, 1981 Mrs. Scalze stated tha~ she would like to see Mr. frattalone dedicate his half of the easement for Spruce Street to the City. Mr. Frattalone agreed that he would do this. Mrs. Nardini stated that the City should try to get all the easements for Spruce Street now. Mr. Fahey stated that Resolution No. 81-3-113 should be rescinded as it grants Mr. Frattalone site plan approval subject to the improvement of Spruce Street. Mr. Forsberg expressed concern for fire protection of the property with the present condition of the road. Mr. Frattalone stated that the road was in good condition, and any type of vehicle could drive on the road. Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-162 - RESCINDING RESOLUTION N0. 87-3-113 - The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini. ~yes (5) Fahey, Nardini, Scalze, Hanson, Forsberg. Nayes (0~. Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Pages 107 and 108. Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-763 - GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO MR. FRANK FRATTALONE CODITINGENT UPON FITS MEETINC, TNE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. TFIFlT MR. FRATTALONE COMPLY WITFI RECOMMENDFlTIONS 1 TNROUGH 7 CONTFlINED IN THE PLANNER'S REPORT DFlTED MARCH 2, 1981; 2, THAT MR. FRATTALONE GRANT TO THE CITY A 30 FOOT EASEMENT ON HIS PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUING SPRUCE STREET THROUGH TO SOUTH OWASSO> 3. AND THAT MR, FRATTALONE BE ISSUED A BUILDING PERMIT ONLY AFTER FILING AN APPROVED BOND FOR LFlNDSCAPING AS REQUIRED BY TNE COUNCIL AT THAT TIME The foreyoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. /{yes (5) Fahey, Scalze, Hanson, Forsberg, Nardini, Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 108. There was no one present wishing to speak at the public hearing regarding the conditional use permit requested by Mr. Frattalone for outside storage and underground fuel tanks. Mrs. Sca7ze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-764 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MR. FRANK FRAT7ALONE FOR UNDERGROUND FUEL TADIKS FlND OUTSIDE STORAGE Page -13- MINUTES City Council Flpri7 8, 1981 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. Flyes (5) Scalze, Fahey, Hanson, Nardini, Forsberg. Nayes (O). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 109. Mr. Fahey introducecl the following reso7ution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-165 - APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MR. FRFlNK FRATTALONE FOR UNDERGROUND FUEL TFlNKS AND FOR OUTSIDE STORFlGE The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. Ayes (5) Fahey, Hanson, Nardini, Forsberg, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 109. Mr. Frattalone informed the Council that he has a change he wants to make to his building plans which includesthe moving of the offices proposed for the building so that they are not located in a second story, but on the same leve7 as the rest of the building. The City Clerk informed Mr. Frattalone that he will have to submit new plans and they would be resubmitted to the Planning Commission. Pub7ic Mr. Johnson has requested that the City of Little Canada vacate the Hearing proposed Lake Street an<I alleyway located between Keller Parkway and Proposed LaBore Road. Vacation Of Lake The following people were present objecting to the vacation: Dr. and Street Mrs. Thomas Keenan, Mr. Mason, Mr. Bernie Carlson, and Mr. Boyson. Mrs. Scalze introduced the following reso7ution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-166 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED VACFlTTON OF LAKE STREET A~1D ALLEYWAY The foregoing resolution was duly seconded Mr. Fahey. qyes (5) Scalze, Fahey, Hanson, Nardini, Forsberg. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 110. Mrs. Nardini put a motion on the floor to deny the vacation of Lake Street. Mrs. Scalze seconded that motion. The City Attorney stated that the proper way to deny the vacation would be to put a motion on the floor to approve the vacation and then vote it down. Mrs. Nardini and Mrs. Scalze withdrew their motion. Page -74- MINUTES City Council Apri1 8, 1981 P1r. Hanson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. II1-4-167 - APPROVING TFIE VACATION OF LAKE STREET AND THE ALLEYWFlY AS REQUESTED BY MR. JOHNSON The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. Flyes (0). Nayes (5) Hanson, Fahey, Nardini, Forsberg, Scalze. Resolution denied. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 110. Ruth Pnr. Nughes of Hughes Construction appeared before the Council. Mr. Street Hughes reported that he has abided by the Planner's recommendations And PUD to bring down the size of the duplexes to allow room for a double Agreement width driveway. The Planner stated that Mr. Hughes has been most cooperative in making changes that have been recommended by the Planning Commission and himself on the Ruth Street property. The Planner stated that he would like to check on the landscaping for the development. The P1anner stated that Mr. Flughes has moved the garages as suggested and provided a turn around space on the driveway. The P1anner stated that the turn-around space on a couple of the driveways is in violation of the setback requirements, but as this property abutts the railroad tracks, the Planner sees no problem with this. Mrs. Nardini asked if the Council has vacated Lake Street. Nardini was not certain that Lake Street was vacated, and she stated that she was not in favor of the vacation as it would be giving City property away that could be used for open space. The City Planner stated that the PUD included the vacation of Lake Street. Mr. Fahey stated that the property was rezoned to R-2 PUD with the understanding that Lake Street vacation was a part of this. Mrs. Nardini suggested that the Council officially go on record reyarding the vacation of Lake Street. Mr. Richard Demont stated that he was denied a variance and felt 9t is unfair that he was denied as his property abutts a portion of Lake Street. Mr. Forsberg stated that there is a difference because the section of Lake Street being discussed 9n the case of Mr. Hughes only goes to the railroad tracks. Mayor Hanson stated that he,too> felt it was unfair that Mr. Demont was denied a variance. Page -75- MINUTES City Council April 8, 1981 Mr. Hanson introduced the following reso1ution ancl moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-16II - APPROVING THE VFlCATION OF LFlKE STREET FROM EFlST OF RUTH STREET TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PUD AGREEMENT TO BE NEG07IATED 6ETWEEN THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA AND MR. HUGHES Of HUGhIES CONSTRUCTION The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. Ayes (4) Flanson, Fahey, Scalze, Forsberg. Rayes (1) Nardini. Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 111. One of the members of the audience questioned whether the residents had a chance to say that they were not in favor of the rezoning to PUD R-2. The fact that this portion of Lake Street was vacated and Mr. Demont was not granted a variance was also questioned. Mr. Fahey stated that at the public hearing regarding the rezoning, the residents of the area were given the opportunity to voice their feelings. Fahey also pointed out that the portion of Lake Street which was vacated did not lead anywhere, on1y extended from east of Ruth Street to the railroad tracks. Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the Planning Commission recommended the approval of Mr. Hughes' proposal 6 to 0. Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLU7ION N0. 81-n-169 - APPROVING THE R-2 PUD AS PROPOSED The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. Ayes (5) Scalze, Hanson, Nardini, forsberg, Fahey. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 111. Mr. Hanson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-170 -DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT A PUD FlGREEMENT BASF.D ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY PLFlNNER The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Dlardini. qyes (5) Hanson, Nardini, Fahey, Forsberg, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 112, The City Clerk stated that the Council should go on record as having received a petition against the Hughes proposal for the development of Ruth Street and requesting the property be rezoned to R-1. Page -16- MINUTES City Council Apri7 8, 1981 Mayor Hanson state~ that he acknowledged receipt of these petitions. The City Flttorney stated that the minutes should reflect the receipt of this petition. However, the Flttorney felt the petition was not in order in view of the rezoning of the property from R-3 to R-2 PUD and the concept approval granted Mr. Hughes. Mr. Parks stated that these are concerns that were expressed at the time of the public hearing. Mrs. Nardini informed the audience that the Counci1 felt the rezoning to R-2 PUD was the lesser of two evils. linder the R-3 zoning that was on the property a 39 unit apartment bui7ding cou7d have been built. Mr. Forsberg stated that the proposal is only for 16 units rather than the 39 units the neighborhood could have gotten. Forsberg also stated that the R-2 PUD zoning would serve as a buffer between the R-1 property and the railroad tracks. A member of the audience stated that it is the people that will be living in the area that the neighbors are concerned with, Mayor Hanson stated that he knows of several private homeowners who do not keep up their property. Mayor Hanson also stated that the public hearing on this matter was conducted fairly. A member of the audience stated that there were two meetings held on this subject, and there were people who could not attend both meetings. Mrs. Nardini informed the audience that if everyone in the neighborhood had opposed the rezoning to R-2 PUD, the Council would sti17 not have had an alternative but to rezone to R-2 PUD. Nardini stated that the City did not feel it could afford to pay the damages on this piece of property that would have resulted in rezoning it to R-1. Minnesota Mr. Bruce Hubbard of Minnesota Mini Storage appeared before the Council Mini requesting approval of the concept plan for the m5ni storage development Storage he is proposing. Mr. Hubbard stated that he has had several meetings with the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation and the result of these meetings is that Mr. Hubbard will be dedicating approximately 2.2 acres of property as ponding area. Mr, Hubbard stated that the State will be screening the ponding area. Minnesota Mini Storage will be giving the City easements to get to their lift station. Mr. Hubbard also stated that he will be installing an underground storm sewer system to handle the drainage problems of the private homes in the area. The City Planner stated that the Council should grant concept and development stage approval contingent upon the grading and drainage plan approval of the City Engineer and the legal aspects being worked out 6y the City Attorney. Page -17- MINUTES City Council Flpri1 8, 7987 The Planner stated that Mr. Flubbard would still have to come in for final plan approval for his building permit. At that time Flubbard would submit detailed landscaping plans and a signage plan. Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the Planning Commission recommendecl approval 6 to 0. Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-171 - APPROVING THE CONCEPT PLAN fOR MINNESOTA MINI STORAGE SUBJECT TO THF. COMMENTS MFlDE BY 7HE CITY PL~NNER The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. qyes (5) Scalze, Forsberg, Hanson, Nardini, Fahey. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Reso1ution Book No. 7, Pages 112 and 113. Mr. Hanson introduced the fol1owing resolution and moved its acioption: RESOLUTION N0. 87-4-172 - DIRECTING THE CITY FlTTORNEY TO WORK OUT A PUD AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA FlND MR. BRUCE HUBBARD OF MINNESOTFl MINI STORAGE The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. {{yes (5) Fianson, Forsberg, Fahey, Sca1ze, Mardini. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution 6ook No. 7, Page 113. Mr. Hubbard stated that he will have all the documents in for industrial revenue bond consideration at the April 22 meeting. Mr. Hubbard also stated that he hoped the City would give him consideration for the property that he has haci to dedicate to the State when they consider his park charge. Cub Mr. Robert Schuler, representing Cub Foods, appeared before the Counc9l Expansion requesting approval of building plans for the addition of a meat market to the Cub Foods building. Mr. Nanson asked the status of the office addition building permit. Nirs. Nardini replied that that matter has been taken care of. Mayor Hanson pointed out that the Planner has recommended approval of the plans. Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTIODI N0. 81-4-173 - APPROVING CUB EXPANSIOPI PLANS FlS SUBMITTED SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL Of THE BUILDI~lG INSPECTOR AND MRS. NFlRDINI Page -18- MINUTES City Council Flpril B, 1981 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. ~yes (5) Forsberg, Fianson, Fahey, Nardini, Scalze, Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 113. Kath Mr. Kath appeared before the Council requesting a variance for an Expansion addition to his building he is proposing. The Planner stated that the addition could not be built without a variance. The variance would be needed on the setback to Woodlyn Flvenue. The building would come six feet from the right-of-way. The Planner stated that most cities' ordinances provide for an exemption to setbacks in order for buildings to conform to the setback of the surrounding buildings. The City of Little Canada's ordinance does not provide for this. The Planner stated that he feels an amendment should be added to the City's ordinance to provide this. Without the amendment, the building would need a variance and this requires that a public hearing be held. The City Attorney stated that in some cases it is desirable to have the setback on a building the same as the surrounding building. The Attorney suggested that the Councit immediately amend the ordinance and then a public hearing would not have to be held on the Kath request. Mrs. Scalze stated that she is not in favor of amending the ordinance to fit this situation. The Attorney stated that this would not be the case as this amendment should have been in the ordinance. Mr. Fahey stated that he was not in favor of the variance. Fahey asked if the size of the building could be reduced to meet setback requirements. Fahey also stated that there is such a thing as getting too big for the property. The Attorney stated that ~f the Council grants a variance without a hardship existing, the Council will have set a precedent. Fahey stated that he sees no hardship in this case. Mrs. Scalze stated that she would like to take a 1ook at the situation. Fahey stated that a lot of other people have been deniad variances that have had better reasons. The City Clerk reported that the earliest a public hearing could be held would be at the May 13 Council meeting. Mr. Hanson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-174 - CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR KATH BROS. EXPANSION FlT THE MAY 13, 1981 COUNCIL MEETING Page -19- MINUTES City Council April 8, 1981 The foregoing resotution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. ~yes (5) Hanson, Scalze, Nardini, forsberg, Fahey. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 114. Hughes Mrs. Scalze s•tated that there will be a park charge on each unit Construction that Hughes Construction is proposing for development on the east side of Ruth Street. The City Planner agreed as this is a resubdivision of property. Planning Council held another vote on the remaining term of eight months on Commission the Planning Commission. The ballot resulted as follows: Mr, Fahey Vacancy voted for Mr. Davison; Mr. Flanson voted for Mr. French; Mrs. Scalze voted for Mr. Davison; Mr. Forsbery abstained; and Mrs. Nardini voted for Mr. LaMay. The City Attorney stated that Council was again deadlocked on the vote as an appointment to the P7anning Commission needs the vote of the majority of Council. Mrs. Nardini suggeste~ that perhaps more extensive resumes should be required of applicants. Nardini also suggested that the position be readvertised, but that those who have already applied, need not reapply. Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-175 - TABLING ACTION ON THE FlPPOIMTMEPIT TO TfIE PLANNING COMMISSION AND INSTRUCTING THC CITY CL.ERK TO READVERTISE THE VACANCY The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini. Pyes (5) Forsberg, Nardini, Hanson, Fahey, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 114. Free Dump Mr. forsberg informed the Counc~l that Free Dump Day will be held on Day And May 2, 1981. Clean-up Day will be Flpril 11, 1981 and there will be Clean-Up 75 Gir1 Scouts picking up trash that day. McDonald's will be providing Day plastic bags for the clean up. Calling Mr. forsberg asked that the Council approve the advertisement for For Seal seal coating bids on certain City streets in accordance with the Uti1ity Coating Department's plan for the seal coating of City streets. 6ids Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-176 - CALLING FOR SFAL COATING BIDS FOR THE SEFlL COATING OF CERTFlIN CITY STREETS IN 1981 Page -20- MINUTES City Council Flpril 8, 1981 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. Ayes (5) Scalze, Forsberg, Fahey, Hanson, Nardini. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 115. Mr. Forsberg stated that the bids would be opened on May 8, 1981 in the City Center. Purchase Mr. forsberg reported that he has two quotations for garage door Of Garage openers for the City Garage. They are from Door Systems, Inc, in Door the amount of $945.00 and from Crawford Doors in the amount of $950.00. Openers Mr. Forsberg recommended that the quotation from Door Systems be awarded. Mr. Forsberg introduced the follow9ng resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-177 - AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF GARAGE DOOR OPE~IERS FROM DOOR SYSTEMS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $945.00 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. qyes (5) Forsberg, Hanson, Fahey, Scalze, Nardini. Nayes (0). Resotution dec1ared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 115, Carpet & Mr. Forsberg stated that he has two quotations for carpeting and Linoleum tiling portions of the City Garage. They are from Jerry's Carpet For The in the amount of ~937.17 and from St. Paul Linoleum in the amount City Garage of $748.00. Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resotution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-4-178 - AWARDING TFIE QUOTA7ION FOR CARPET AND LINOLEUM FOR TFIE CITY GFlRAGE TO ST. PAUL LINQLEUM IN THE AMOUNT OF $748.00 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by P~r. Hanson. Ayes (5) Forsberg, Hanson, Fahey, Nardini, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This reso1ution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 116. City's Mr. Forsberg reported that the Utility Department shou1d have its new Old pick-up truck in a week or two. Forsberg recommended that the old Pick-up pick-up be sold to a scrap dealer, as the truck is unsafe to sell to Truck anyone else. Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-a-179 - AUTHORIZING TNE UTILITY DEPARTP1ENT TO SELL THE CITY S OLD PICK-UP TRUCK TO A SCRFlP DEFlLFR Page -21- MINUTES CITY COUNCIL April B, 1981 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. I{yes (4) Forsberg, Hanson, Nardini, Scalze. Nayes (1) Fahey. Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 116. Cleaning Of Mrs. Nardini asked the status of the cleaning of the ditch running County Road from County Road B-2 to the pond. The Engineer stated that he would B-2 bring these plans in at the next Council meeting. Tour Of Mrs. Nardini asked if the Council was going to tour the C9ty prior The City to Free Dump Day. Mayor Hanson stated that he would do a tour and ask those property owners with problems with debree in their yards to c7ean them up. Schrier Council decided that they would have a meeting with Mr. Schrier to Property discuss plans for the deve7opment of his property on April 29. Costa Mrs. Nardini asked the City Engineer how he is proceeding on the Situation Jenny Costa matter. The Engineer stated that he would have a presentation on this at the Flpril 22 Council meeting. St. Jude's Mrs. Nardini asked the Engineer if he had drainage plans for St, Jude's. The Engineer replied that he did and he would send them to her. City Mrs. Scalze asked the City Clerk to have Mr. McNamara of the McNamara Insurance Insurance Agency look into the possibility of the City's liability in Tennis using the tennis courts at the Little Canada Day Car Center. Courts Secretary's Mayor Nanson reminded the Council that Wednesday, April 22, is Day Nationa1 Secretary's Day. Adjourn Mr. Nanson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. II1-4-180 - FlDJOURNING The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. Flyes (5) Nanson, Scalze, Nardini, Forsberg, Fahey. ~layes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This reso1ution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 117. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:40 A.M. Respectfully submitted,, `/'~,1,.~~/_!Pe , C J~.<'J~ {r~--~~ Page -22- Kathleen Glanzer, Recording Secretary