My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-81 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
10-28-81 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 1:33:52 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />October 28, 1981 <br />Mrs. Nardini commented that as of yesterday the Planner still had not <br />seen these plans. <br />Mrs. Scalze commented that she was concerned with off-street parking. <br />Sca7ze commented that with a duplex, the more off-street parking the <br />better. <br />Mr. Fahey reminded the Council that some people on the other side of <br />the City were turned down when ~hey requested approval of zero lot lines. <br />The Planner stated that two driveways were allowed on lots of 250 feet <br />frontage. <br />F~rs. Nardini asked if this would effect c9rcular driveways. The P'lanner <br />stated that it would. <br />A resident of the area informed the Council that he was against approval <br />of this permit as he was opposed to more rental property in the City. <br />Mrs. Scalze commented that she did not think a lot of people in the City <br />were aware that City ordinance allows one duplex in ten single family <br />homes in an R-1 area. <br />Mrs. Scalze questioned how Mr. Shortage would have adequate off-street <br />parking with only a 75 foot lot. Scalze commented that some of these <br />questions would have been handled h1d the plans been reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission. <br />The Planner suygested that the driveway could be flared to pick up <br />both garages and only have one entrance/exit on the street. <br />Mr. Fahey stated that the permit could be approved based on that condition. <br />Mrs. Lancette stated that she would like her husband's name removed from <br />the petition stating that he had no opposition to the conditional use <br />permit being approved. Mr. Lancette signed the petition and did not <br />realize what he was signing. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 81-10-631 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC NEARING <br />ON THE PERRY SHORTAGE REQUEST FOR Fl CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT FOR A DUPLEX IN AN R-1 AREA <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Scalze, Hanson, Forsberg, Nardini. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared ~opted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 409. <br />Page -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.