Laserfiche WebLink
1~I~CNUTliS <br />City CounciJ. <br />Apri1 14, 1982 <br />Jdater Service i~irA Glanzer a],so in£ormed the Council that there was a possability <br />Charge (Conto) that if more peop].e hooked up to water during 19829 the service <br />charge could be lowered next year. <br />i~ir, V~.lleaux suggested that the City charge a maintenance fee fbr <br />every 75 feet oF watermain, <br />Mr. F'ahey stated that the service cha.rge could be charged S'or every <br />75 feet of street frontage within the trailer park, <br />Mr, F1anson informed the Counci], that the bi1],ings have already been <br />sent out £or the S'irst quarter w9.th the charges as previously adopted <br />by the Council, <br />A'~r, Fahey stated that the 7~ foot charge did not bother him as it <br />would pick up property owners with large pieces of land and charge <br />them a$6.00 charge S'or every 75 feet, <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that a charge per every 75 feet was fine with her, <br />Mx„ Forsberg felt that the peop.le hooked up to water shou].d pay the <br />service charge, <br />T}~e City Attorney in£ormed the Council that in order to rescixid the <br />resolution the Counoil previous7,y passed adop~z.~~the :~6,00 service <br />charge it will take a 2/3rd9s vote of the Counoil„ 2/3rdos would <br />be four a£firmative votes, <br />12r, ~'orsberg introduced the £o].lowing resoluti.on and moved its adopta.on: <br />Rl'sSOI,UTION N0. 82-4.•197 A RF,SCINAING RESOLUTION N0, 82..3.,125 <br />DEAli G WI7'H THE s~ .00 4dATER SERVICE CHARGE AND 1NS7'RUCTING <br />THAT IN THB Nk:~T qUAH7'ERLY BILLING THOSE YROPERTY OvJNERS wITH <br />vJATER AVATLABLE~ BUT NOT HOOKED UP BE GIUliN A$6,00 Ck2EDIT <br />AND DECI,ARING THAT THE ~~JATI;R SEftVICE C1IAHGI: SHOULD BE <br />IiVCFt~ASED TO 7'k1051; PEOYL~ AOOKED UP TO WATER <br />`Phe foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini, <br />Ayes (3) F'orsberg~ Nardini, Hanson, <br />Nayes (2) Scalze' Fahey, <br />Resolution denied, <br />`Phis resolution appears in Resolution Book Na. 8, Yage 143a <br />( Note: on a resolution to rescind it takes a 4/5 vote to approve) <br />bilartaing The Attorney has reviewed the joint powers agreement between Little <br />Slpe~ Canada~ Shoreview and Vadnais Heights for wa.rning siren systems and <br />Systems has £ound it acceptab:~e, <br />Agenda Mr. F'orsberg 9.ntroduced the followl.ng resolution and moved its adopta.on; <br />jtem No. 30 <br />RliSOLUTION N0. 82..l~~198 .~ APYROVING 2'HE JOINT POwLHS <br />AGNEEME~IT ~3ET~r7ELV'~li CITIES OF LI'1'TLE CANAUA~ SHORliVIliw` <br />AND VAllNAIS HEIGHTS F'Okt WARNSNG SI~:L,N SYSTEMS AND <br />AUTHORIZING THE Nk;CESSARY SIGNATURES ON TFI1S AGREEMN:NT <br />Page ..27-. <br />