Laserfiche WebLink
MINIIT~S <br />City Cotmci.l <br />Nov. 15, 1932 <br />Sign Mrs. Nardini introduced the followi.ng resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Ordinance <br />Amendment RFSOLUTION N0. II2-11-583 - CLOSING T(IE <br />(Cont.) PUBLIC F{EARING ON TH~ PROPOSED SIGN <br />ORJ)INANCE AMENDMENT <br />The foregoinp, resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (3) Nardi.ni~ Scalze, IIanson. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Boolc No. 8, Page 583. <br />Mr. ilanson poi.nted out to the city Attorney that the public hearing <br />noti.ce stated Chat the ordi.nance may be amended to 20% of the <br />siloueCte. The City ALtorney commented that the Council couLd <br />amend the ordinance to a figure Less than the ?0% that was adverti.sed. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the folLowing resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 82-11-584 - DIRFCTING TItE <br />CI'CY PLANNPIt TO PRF,PART' AN ORDINANCE <br />AMENDMENT TO THE CiTY'S SIGN ORDINANCL <br />S~TTING A RATE OP 15% OP THE SILOUE7'TE <br />ARF..A <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nar.dini. <br />Ayes (3) Nar.di.ni., Scalze, llanson. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resoluti.on Declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 8, Page 584. <br />Mrs. Nardini asked if the Counci.l was goi.ng to do anything about the <br />sma11 boulevard signs in the City. The Pl.anner reported that the <br />ordinance presently states that these signs are non-conforming. <br />Viking Mrs. Nardini introduced the following resolution and moved i.ts adoption: <br />Partnership <br />Signs RESOLlJTION N0. 82-11-5£35 - f3RINGING <br />'LHP VIKING PARTNERSI~IIP SIGN REQUPST TO <br />Age~da TAAL}? <br />lt~m No. 4 <br />T.he foregoing r.esolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (3) Nardini., Scalze, Hanson. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Kesolution declared adopted. <br />This resoluti.on appears i.n Resolution i~ook No. 8, Page 585. <br />Page -4- <br />