Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTFS <br />City Council <br />Nov. 15, 1982 <br />Viking The Planner stated that the Council could count the rear of the <br />Partnership Little Cana da Mall to deter.mine the silouette a rea for signage. <br />Si.gns (Cont.) 'Che Planner pointed out that this woul.d have to be considered <br /> at the time that Vilcing Partnershi.p would come in for plans to <br /> expand the mall, <br />Mrs. Nardini pointed out that the visibility for signage on Highway <br />36 would be very limzted. Mr. Br.octy agreed. Mr. Brody felC Chat <br />any signage on this size of the building would be limited to the <br />mall entrance sign. <br />Mrs. Nardini commenCed that she fe7.t if the ordinance were changed <br />Co l~i% of the silouette area~ the Little Canada Mall wouLd kiave to <br />live with this. <br />Mr. Fahey stated that he did not thinlc the City should 111ow the <br />frontage on Viking Drive to be counY.ed at this time. Mrs. Scalze <br />repl.ied that L-he Little Canada Mall fronts as much on Viking <br />Drive as Levitz fronts on the railroad traclcs. <br />Mr. Fahey stated that if the City counts the frontage on Vilcing <br />Dr~.i.ve, the Little Canada Mall shoulct have to live with the present <br />ordinance providi.n~; for 10% silouette area. <br />The PLanner pointed out that Che I,ittle Canada Mall cao~ld not be <br />able to count the entire side of the building on Viking Drive. The <br />Planner stated that the lot is L-shaped. They would only be able to <br />count. the amount of actual street f.rontage. The Planner stated that <br />this could be counted now, but when the bui.lding is added on to <br />the signa~;e would have to be adjusted. <br />Mrs. Scalze asked what frontage the Ci.ty gives to Levitz. The Planner <br />stated that he was not sure, but thought C.he buildin~ abutted Country <br />Drive and Che freeway. Mrs. Scalze stated that she thought Levitz <br />ahouLd be counCed for two sides of street frontage. <br />Mr. f~rody stated tliat he thought Vi.king Partn~rship had about 100 <br />feet of frontage on Viking Drive. The Pl.anner stated that there <br />would be about 210 feet of additi.onal signage £or the baclc of the <br />building. <br />Mr. Pahey stated chat 15% of the total of £~820 square feet would <br />be 1323 square Leet. <br />Mrs. Nardini stated that there is a two-story building planned on <br />the back of the Mall. so the per.centage would be greater when <br />this is actually built. <br />The C~ity Attorney commented that an ordinance is technically not <br />in ef.fect until it is published. <br />Page -5- <br />