10-26-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Counci7. Oct. 26, 1983 Market Place Mr. Jim Ste].lick of the Marlcet Place, appeared before the Counci.l< Mr. Stelli.ck reported that he began construction of tkle addi.tional. Agenda parking stalls at the Marlcet: Place as he had wriCten appr.oval from Item ~o, 18 the 6uilding Inspector to do so back in September of 1982. The reason that construction did not start until this ti.me was Mr. Stellick did not have the funds to do so until he sold part of. Che Marlcet l?lace Property to the Ci.ty for ~its senior citizen housi.ng. Mr, Stellick reported that construction started on the stalls on October 10 and on October 24 the ~uiLai.ng Inspector order.ed the worlc stopped. Mrs. Nardini reported that when she noticed the coorlc eoin~; on at the shopping center, she discussec! ~it wi.th the Planner and Ci.ty Attorney. Mr. Hanson aslced if: Mr. Stellick was given a reason Eor the worlc stopa~;e. Stellick replied that he cals not. Mr. Stellick stated that he did not br.ing the matter before the Planning Commission and the Council as he bel.i.evedhe had written approval fr.om the I3uilding Inspector for the ~aorlc. Mr, SCell.ick reported that he also d:iscussed this with the Council at the meeting in which the rezoni.ng of the property was considered. Mrs. Scalze replied that she does not recall approving the parlcing expansion. The Planner reported that under the zonin~; ordinance~ two checlcs are requi.red anyti.me that parking is altered or expanded. Also the En~;ineer. is required to review final construction plans. Additionally, a conditional use permit i.s required for this expansi.on. The PLanner pointed ouC that Che shopping center operates under a PUD and any modi.£ication to that requires a rev~ieo~ of the Counci.l. 'Che Planner r.eported that in September o£ 1.9H2 the Building Inspector only loolced at some rough sketches for the partci.ng expansion. It was assumed that P1r. Stelliclc would come back £or final. appr.oval. Mr.. Stelliclc stated that Mr. Loclte stated that he agreed with the alternatives presented, and Stell.iclc sao~ no reason to believe that any oCher approval was requised. Y4r.s. Nardini. read the Letters involved. Narciini. pointed out that Stel.lick suUmitted t~ao r.ough plans and the 6uilding InspecT.or simply replied Y.o the letter. ~ardi.ni pointed out that Mr. Stelliclc has met with the Planner and Building Inspector on other matters and this was never brought up, P1r< Hanson commented that he fe1C the Auilding Inspector should have informed Mr. Stelliclc that the Counci.l must take acti.on on the parking expansion, Page -23-