My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-84 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
01-11-84 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:00:54 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:50:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUCES <br />Ci.ty Counci.l <br />Jan. 17.~ 1984 <br />Insurance The City Clerlc reported that the reason for the backup wzs tree roots <br />Claim (ConC.) in the sewer line. <br />Mrs. Nardi.ni. reported thaC the insurance company has pai.d her claims. <br />'The Clerk reporCed that some people on Pdger.ton ~aere al.so paid. <br />Mr. PorsUerg questioned the type of insurance the City has if it will <br />not honor the claims. Sc~lze commented that there are other irisurance <br />companies around and the Ci.ty is payi.ng a lot oI money in premi.ums. <br />The Ci.ty Attorney stated thst the i.nsurance company i.s obli.p,ated to <br />handle the cl.ai.ms, but they handle thcm as they see Ei.t. `Che Attorney <br />statc~~d that i.t m'ight mean that these two gentl.emen might liave to sue <br />the City~ and the insurance company woul.d then defend the sui.t. <br />Mr. Pahey su~;gested that Che City AtCOrney loolc into iC, and if he feel.s <br />the City is liabie, then the Ci.ty shoul.cl write a lett:er to the insurance <br />company on Che matter. <br />The Attorney fe].t i.t mi.ght~be ouY.side t:he ~arameters of the City's <br />contract with the insurance company to do thi.s. <br />Mr. Pahey felt Chat the City coul.d put some pressure on Che i.nsurance <br />company and di.d not f.eel that citi.zens had to sue in order to collecC <br />damages. <br />Hanson pointed out that the insur.ance company i.s admi.tting some <br />liabi.ltty. <br />The AtCOrney stat:ed that they ar.e admitting they will pay some money <br />in order to get ri.d of a case. The Attorney felt that they have accepted <br />the duty to deEend Che case and right now they are tryin~ to negoti.ate <br />the amounts i.nvolved. <br />Mr. Plastell reported that the adjuster inf:or.med hi.m that by the time <br />he would pay a la~oyers fee to £i.ght the case, the ~2,200 would loolc E;ood. <br />Mr. Chlebeclc stated that he does not thi.nlc that the City can seCtle <br />thi_s claim out of. tits funds. Mr. P'ahey agreect that the City is not <br />assuming l.iability. Ftowever, felt that if the C~ity was liable, iC <br />could put pre>sure on the insurance company. <br />Mr. Flanson aslced what was donc~~ to alleviate the situation. The Cl.erk <br />repli.ed that that area of se~.oer has to be augered more o[ten< <br />The Clerlc f,el.t that the Attorney should i.nvesti.gate the si.tuati.on. <br />Mr.s. Scalze stated that bef.ore the insurance pol.icy is rei.nstated, <br />the City should get a clarification of what i.s covered and how these <br />things will be handled in the fut:ure. <br />Page -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.