Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTIs'S <br />City Council <br />T~ay 9, 1984 <br />Imp. 8[4-10 Mr. torsber; pointed out that the improvement was petitionect Lor and <br />(Cont.) not initiated by the Council. <br />Mr.s. Scalze pointed ouL- that Yorkton Development had to provi.de its <br />own roads and could not go through residential areas. <br />Mr. Ityl.and as)ced it the industrial property ~oere assessed, if the <br />City could restrict thei.r use of. the road. Mr. ganson commenCed <br />that if a property is assessed, Y.hey woul.<1 have the ri.ght to use <br />the road. Mr. Ilyland suggested that they be assessed for secaer and <br />water, but not street. <br />Mr. Pahey stated that the City could do Chis if Mr. Buse was willing <br />to piclc up the cost. <br />Mr. Porsberg su~gestect that the industri.al properY.y be assessed for <br />limited use, jusc light traftic and not trucics. <br />Mr. Buse aslced cohy a 6 Con road ti•~oul<i Ue required and pointed out <br />that Al1.en i.s a 3 ton road. Mr. Forsberg replied that these are the <br />new standards ehat the City has in ef.fect. <br />Mr. Pahey stated that he was not prepared to put the street through <br />to County Road D. Pahey su~;gested that the matter be tabl.ed for <br />30 days for Mr. Buse and Mr. 1Celly to consider their posit:ion. <br />Mr. Carley stated that a 6 ton road could be installed to the Buse <br />property. The only proUlem is that in the futur.e there cvill not <br />be much property to spread the cost of the po~ver Line property <br />assessment over when the road goes al.l the way through. <br />Mr. Hanson pointed out that the rest of the property could develop <br />off of Vanderbee with a cul-de-sac. <br />Mrs. Scalze pointed out that even if truclcs are lcept out, should <br />a body shop go in, there woul.d be a lot ot traf.fic generated. <br />Mr. Flanson stated chat this ~oould be hard to police. <br />Mr. Pahey suggested that the assessment be against the 33use property <br />with no industri.al traffic at a11. 'I'he industrial could be assessed <br />for water and sewer. <br />ScaLze said that the can et sewer and water £rom Centerville. <br />y ~' Mrs. <br />Scalze i.nformed Mr. KeLly that ~vlien he develops the property, the City <br />has a park dedication or.dinance that he inust comply eaith. Mrs. Scalze <br />felt thlt the Park Commissi.on wi11 want land as a parlc char~;e i.n thi.s <br />area. <br />Mr. T4il<e Gallagher pointed Qut that there is a large oalc tree in the <br />area that shouLd not be destroyed. <br />Page -7- <br />