Laserfiche WebLink
MINUT~S <br />City Council <br />May 8, 1985 <br />Steneroden <br />Resoning <br />Agenda <br />It.em No. 5 <br />Mr. Rocky Waite, representing Mrs. Steneroclen, appeared before the Council <br />requesting the rezoning of the Steneroden property from R-1 to ~-3. <br />Mr. Waite is proposing to construct a self-service car coash on the <br />fr.ont portion of the property ~oith mini-storage i.n the back. <br />Mr, Waite reported that since the last Council meeting, he has met with <br />the residents of Iona Lane and has agreect to eliminate the future car <br />wash area originaLly shown and to move the bui.lding to the south side <br />of the property. <br />~daite also repor[ed that he has agreed to put over 20 feet of buf£er <br />zone from Iona Lane. <br />Mr. Waite stated thaC he has not shown the rest of the property as <br />developed because they did not plan to extend mini-storage into this <br />area. Waite sCated that they ar.e not ready to build the the mini-storage <br />today, but are just proposing it for the future. <br />Waite explained that the mini-storage caould be one-story construction <br />of bri.ck and block and all lighting will be in the middle of the property. <br />There wi11 be fencingon the north and south sides of the property and <br />they will leave as many trees in the area as possible. <br />Waite reported that garages are proposed for the north side of the <br />property so that a cyclone fence does not have to be built. <br />Mr. Waite reported that the Iona Lane people want the area to remain <br />strictly residential and do not want the car wash on Rice Street. <br />Waite explained that the property is very diLficult Co ctevelop with the <br />only access being Rice Street. <br />Mrs. ScaLze asked when the property went tax-f.orfeit. Mr. Waite replied <br />that the property never went tax-Lorteit. <br />Mr. Collova aslced what i.s located to the east of the property. Mr. Waite <br />replied that Schrier's development is to the east and if the property <br />were to develop as residential, access should be through Schrier's. <br />Mr. Fahey asked if Mr. Waite has spolcen to Mr< Schrier about thi.s. <br />Waite replied that Mr> Schrier has not returned his calls. <br />Mrs. Scalze did not feel it was impossible to develop the property as <br />R-l. <br />Mr. Waite commented that if. a street went in along the south boundary <br />ot the property, the City wovld be left with residentially-zoned property <br />on one side of the street and commercial on the other. <br />Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the property on the south could be rezoned <br />to perhaps R-2. <br />Page -3- <br />