HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-08-85 Council MinutesMINUTES OF THE REGULAR M~ETING
CITY COIJNCIL
LITTL~ CANAUA, MINNL~SOTA
May 8, 1985
Pursuant to due call and noti.ce thereof a regular meecing of the
Council of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota was held on the
F3th day of May, 1985 in the Council Chambers oL the City Center
located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City.
Agenda Mayor Richael Fahey chaired tk~e meeting and caLled it to order at
Item No. 1 7:30 P.M. and the following members were present at roll ca11:
Agenda MEMBERS PKliSEN'L: Mayor Mr. Michael Fahey
Item Noe 2 Councilman Mr. Wi.lliam Illesener
Councilman Mr. Rick Collova
Councilwoman Mrs. Mugs Nardini
Councilwoman Mrs. I3everly Scalze
ALSO PRGSENT: Gity Clerk Mr. Joseph Chlebeck
City Atlorney Mr> Thomas Sweeney
City Engi.neer Mr. Donald Carley
City Planner Mr. David Licht
Recording Secretary Mrs. KaChleen Glanzer
Approval Mrs. Nardini felt that the following sta tement should be adde<i to che
Of The minutes of the April 24 Council meeting on page 19 under the Harsted
Minutes and McCullough matter:
Agenda "Mrs. Nardi.ni. suggested that the property could be developed
Item No. 3 from Park Street or County Road C without the office building
using the 59 f.eet of fronCage along Rice StreeC."
Mrs. Nardini introduced the following resolution and moved its acloption:
RBSOLUTION N0, 85-5-207 - APPROVING TII~
MINUTES OP THE April ?4, 1985 COUNC'tL
MEETING WITII THE OUTLINED ADDITION
The foregoing reso].ution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener.
Ayes (5) Nardini, I3lesener, CoLLova, Fahey~ Scalze.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution IIook No. 12, Pa~e 207.
Mr. Blesener i.ntroduced the following resolution and moved its adoptions
RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-208 - APPROVING THE
MINU'PES OF TI{F. MAY 1, 1985 WORKSHOP ME~TING
Page -1-
MtNU•res
ct.cy cou„~~i
May 8, 1985
Minutes
(Cont.)
The foregoing resolution caas duly seconded 6y Mr. CoLlova.
Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Nardi.ni, Scalze, Fahey.
Nayes (0).
Resolu[ion declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 12, Page 20II.
Computer Ms. Jean Podominick reported thaC the MinnesoCa Education Computing
System Corporation is inCerested in the City Uecomin~; a piLot City for their
software. Under the system, the City would gat their software free-of-
Agenda charge and in return the City would be expected to answer questions from
Item No. 4 other cities about the soft~vare and perhaps demonstrate i.t. Also, the
City ~oould be expected to purchase an annual support service from the
Company and give them a letCer of approval on the softcaare. The cost
of the annual support agreement is $600 for Che first year.
Mrs. Scal.ze asked iL the City would be gettin~; a lot oE ca11s on the
software. Podominick stated that she <lid not anticipate this as a big
problem for the City.
Podominick also reported that the soEtware has been running in pilot
school programs for 6 months and should be f:r.ee of initial bugs.
The City Auditor also reported that he suppor[s Ms. Podominick's
recommendation. Mr. Voto also reported that the City woul.d also
receive a 20% discount on other services durin~ the firsl year.
Vo[o also pointed out that the support that the City would be receiving
is local and thi.s software should ati the least be as good as the software
that lhe Cily was ori~inally looking at. tlowever, there is no utility
bilLing sofr,ware; but the City can purchase this from another company
at a reasonable cost.
VoCO sCated that there will be another support agreement and vendor
for the utiLi.ty billing system.
Mr. Pahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adopcion:
R~SOLUTION N0. 85-5-209 - A[JTFIORI7ING THE
PURGHASE OP IBM AT COMPUTER HARDWARE L'ROhf
TEL~'1'ERMINALS AND FURTtIER AUTFIORIZING THAT
A UTILITY BILLING SYSTGM I3L PURCHASEU PROM
TIIP S'LATE OF MINNESOTA AS SOON AS POSSII~LT; ANll T}IAT
T(3F, CiTY ENTER IN'LO TI~C YROPOSED AGREEMEN'1' WITkI
THE MINNESOTA EDUCATION COMPUTING CORPORA'LION AS
OUTLINED IN THEIR MAY 8, 1.985 LETTER l1NDER TH~IR
ALYIIA TES1' SITE ARRANGEMPNT
The foregoing resolution olas duly seconded by Mrs. Scalz.e.
Ayes (5) Pahey~ Scalze, Nardini, Collova, Blesener.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
'Lhis resolution appears in Resolution IIool< No. 12, Page 209.
PaQe -2-
MINUT~S
City Council
May 8, 1985
Steneroden
Resoning
Agenda
It.em No. 5
Mr. Rocky Waite, representing Mrs. Steneroclen, appeared before the Council
requesting the rezoning of the Steneroden property from R-1 to ~-3.
Mr. Waite is proposing to construct a self-service car coash on the
fr.ont portion of the property ~oith mini-storage i.n the back.
Mr, Waite reported that since the last Council meeting, he has met with
the residents of Iona Lane and has agreect to eliminate the future car
wash area originaLly shown and to move the bui.lding to the south side
of the property.
~daite also repor[ed that he has agreed to put over 20 feet of buf£er
zone from Iona Lane.
Mr. Waite stated thaC he has not shown the rest of the property as
developed because they did not plan to extend mini-storage into this
area. Waite sCated that they ar.e not ready to build the the mini-storage
today, but are just proposing it for the future.
Waite explained that the mini-storage caould be one-story construction
of bri.ck and block and all lighting will be in the middle of the property.
There wi11 be fencingon the north and south sides of the property and
they will leave as many trees in the area as possible.
Waite reported that garages are proposed for the north side of the
property so that a cyclone fence does not have to be built.
Mr. Waite reported that the Iona Lane people want the area to remain
strictly residential and do not want the car wash on Rice Street.
Waite explained that the property is very diLficult Co ctevelop with the
only access being Rice Street.
Mrs. ScaLze asked when the property went tax-f.orfeit. Mr. Waite replied
that the property never went tax-Lorteit.
Mr. Collova aslced what i.s located to the east of the property. Mr. Waite
replied that Schrier's development is to the east and if the property
were to develop as residential, access should be through Schrier's.
Mr. Fahey asked if Mr. Waite has spolcen to Mr< Schrier about thi.s.
Waite replied that Mr> Schrier has not returned his calls.
Mrs. Scalze did not feel it was impossible to develop the property as
R-l.
Mr. Waite commented that if. a street went in along the south boundary
ot the property, the City wovld be left with residentially-zoned property
on one side of the street and commercial on the other.
Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the property on the south could be rezoned
to perhaps R-2.
Page -3-
MINUTES
City Council
May 8, 1985
Steneroden Mr. Waite pointed out that Chey are willing to look at a PUD on the property
i and would provide a 23 f:oot buffer from Iona Lane. Waite felt that the
Kezon
ng
(Cont,) property in the back was a ~ood buEfer between residential and commercial.
Mr. Pahey a~reed that the front of the property would probably develop
as commercial. tlowever, Pahey felt that the back of the property could
be accessed from Schrier's property and could develop residential.ly.
Fahey felt that the City owed it to the residents in the area to Look
at this possibilityo
It was pointed out that the pr.operty at the intersection of Iona Lane and
Rice S~reet is R-1 and the commercial bUSinesses on that property are
operating with special use permits.
Mr. Pahey feLt that the back of the property should have been con~idered
when Che City considered Schrier's development< The Planner poi.nted out
that it was consictered at thaC time.
Mr.. 6daite statecl Lhat his primary objective caas the car wash on Rice
Street and asked that if the City leave the baclc of the property R-1,
that the Ci.ty give him an access to this property.
Mrs. Scalze pointed out thaC Che lots on County Koad C are large enough
to sp1iC. Nardini poi.nted out that ~he lots were commercial.
The Council asked what is allowed under RI3 zoning. Mrs. Scala.e replie<!
that Rf3 allows duplexes~ or medical oftices and some commercial faciliti.es.
Gloria Bjorlcland of 60 lona Lane appeared before the Council and reported
Chat the Planning Commission has recommended against this pronosal.
I3jorlcland felt that other things could be done with the proper~y ratkter
than a car wash or mini-storage. I~jorkLand stated that she caould like
to buy the piece behind her house for a reasonable price.
Tim Townsley ot 90 Iona Lane stated that he, too, would be willing to
purchase the property behind his house.
Mr. Waite reported that the development would have a buLfer of 40 Eeet of
green space from Iona Lane beLore you would get to the roadway<
Mr. Don Pierce of 30 Iona Lane reported that the residents of Iona Lane
met with Mr< Waite and r.eported that they were against the proposal
and stated that Chey were in favor of R-l. Waite also pointed out that
the PLanning Commission has recommended against the proposal. Pierce
also commented thaL- the City has indicated thaC the area would stay R-1.
Mrs. Scalz.e pointed out that the City is obli~ated to call for a public
hearing when a rezoning is requested.
Pahey stated that the property aLong Rice Street wi.ll probably develop
as commercial, but felt that access to the back pr.operty should be
explored through the Schrier deveLopment.
Page -4-
MINUTPS
Ci.ty Council
May S, 1985
Steneroden Mr. Pierce pointed out that there is a large drainage ditch running through
Rezoning the back of this property. Pierce felt that the City should explore a11
(Cont.) avenues for the development of this property as R-1. Yierce also felt that
most of the property owners cvouLd be willing to purchase the property
behind their homes.
Mr. Collova introduced the following resolution and moved its adoptionc
RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-210 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE STENERODEN KEZONING PROPOSAL
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Nardi.ni.
Ayes (5) Collova, Nardini, Fahey, Scalze, ~Lesener.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This r.esolution appears in Resolution Uoolc No. 12, Page 210.
Mr. Waite pointed out that the property wi11 develop in the future, and
Waite qnestioned the type of development the Gity might get at that time.
Mrs. Scalze suggesCed that if the r.esidents are serious about purchasing
the property behind their homes, that they get eogether and contact Mrs.
Steneroden.
Fahey stated that he would not rule out access from the Schrier property.
Flowever, Pahey stated that if all the property on Sylvan develops before
access can be provided, the likelihood of the property developing as
commercial increases.
rahey also pointed out to the resi.dents that Councils chan~e and a future
Council might be receptive to a commercial development of this property.
Mr. Waite asked if he brought in a reasonable development to the east,
if the Council would be in f.avor of commercial on the Rice Street end of
the property.
Scalze felt that if Mr. Waite came in with a proposal for the property
on Ri.ce Street, it should have the same boundari.es as Che other adjoining
property on Rice Street.
llon Pierce felt that a car coash woulct add r.oo much tr.affic to the area and
pointed out that the people have a problem getting off of Iona Lane as it
l.g,
Pahey stated that he understands tha~ the Iona Lane residents would like
to see a little less active of a development in that area.
Mrs. Scalze introduced the followi.ng resoluCion and moved its adopti.on:
Page -5-
MINllTPS
City Council
May 8, 1985
Steneroden R~SOLUTION N0. 85-5-211 - DTNYING THL~ STENEROllt?N
Rezoning RG70NING PROPOSAL PROM R-1 TO B-3 }3ASED ON TIIE
(Cont.) RGCOMMENDATION OP' TFIE PLANNING COMMISSION ANll DUE
TO TIIE i'ACT TItAT NOT ALL AVENULS HAVG IIE~N PURSUED
AS TO A COMf3INATION OF PROPP:RTY TO TH6 SOUTH AND NORTH
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. ~3lesener.
Ayes (5) Scalze, 131esener, PAhey, Collova, Nardini.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolLrtion appears in Resolution 3Joolc No. 12, Page 211.
Little Canada Mrs. Scalze su~gested that ehe City set up a poLi.cy under which industrial
Mini-Storage revenue bonds are approved. Scalze pointed out that other ciCies have
& Industrial policies and felt that the Council shoul.d review these and try to imple-
Revenue I~onds ment something. Scalze pointed out that the Ci.ty now has a Limited
amount of industrial revenue bonds available.
A~;enda
Item No. 6 Fahey stated that past policy has Ueen to grant t.he bonds Lo anyone who
comes in and requests them. The City has not tried Co legislate the use
of the boncis.
Scalz.e pointed out that the Council promised the City's allotment of: the
bonds to Larry Lee and is now giving some of the allotment to LittLe
Canada Mini-Storage because of an agreement they worked out between
themselves.
Mr. Sten~er., representing Little Canad•a Mini-Storage, reported that they
made applicaCion for the bonds before Mr.. Lee did.
Scalze pointed out that the City does not have to approve bonds, just
Uecause someone has applied for them. Mr> Fahe.y stated that he was
reluctant to hold Mr. Stenger up. Pahey stated that the project is
within the zoning of the property in question.
Mr. Collova felt that if the City were goinp, to set policy on issuance
of. these bonds, it should not be done now. Collova stated that Mr.
Stenger has Cime and money invested in the project.
Mr.s. Scalze stated that Mr. Stenger proceeded with his plans at his own
risk.
Mrs. Nardini stated that she felt Mrs. Scalze was concerned that a mini-
storage i.s not where the City should be investing i.ts limited funds.
Scalze pointed out that the City has other areas of the City coming up
Lor development that might provide more jobs for the City.
Nardini stated that she felt that the purpose of the program was to
create new jobs and a mini-storage would not do this.
Page -6-
MiNUTES
City Council
May 8, 1985
Little Canada Mr. Pahey stated that there are a lot of factors to consider and suggested
that the City hold a workshop on this in order to implement a pol~icy for
Mini-Storage
(Cont.) next year.
Mr. Fahey introduced r.he following r.esolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0. SS-5-212 - APPROVING THE iSSUANC~
OF INDUSTRIAL RGVENUF. ~ONDS IN TIIE AMOUNT OP
$450,000 POR 'PHE LITTLE CANADA MINI-STORAGE
CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OP THG YLANS FOR TI~IE
MINI-STORAGF,
The foYegoi.ng resolution was <tuly seconded by Mr. Collova.
Ayes (3) Fahey, Collova, I~lesener..
Nayes (2) Scalae, Nardini.
Resolution declared adopted>
Thi.s resolution appears in Resolution ]3ook No. 12, Page 21'L.
Mr. Stenger explained the traffic flow pattern of his development proposal.
Mrs. Scalze asked if Stenger has explored the possibility of purchasing
additional property on Rice Street.
Mr.. Stenger stated that he did not know thaC there was property for sale
on Rice Street.
Stenger ex~lained that ehe mini-seora~e would not have access onto Rice
Scree~. Stenger is also proposing a 10 foot by 50 f.oot gr.een area as a
buffer between his development and the KLein property.
Stenger further reported that the bait business would be removed from the
site.
Mr. Stenger submitted to the Council a ctrainage plan far the property,
The Engineer reported that he has reviewed the plan and made some minor
corrections ~ahich Mr. Stenger.'s en~ineer has already cione.
Mr. Stenger reported Chat his drainage plan would drain the whoLe area
and would cost approximately $22,000. Stenger also reported that there
would be a six foo~ retaining wall bui.lt along the property line be[ween
his and the Klein property. Stenger explained the elevations of the Klein
property and his property as well as the proposed roof lines.
Mrs, Scalze caas concerned with ehe size of the over-hangs proposed on the
buildi.n~s.
The Gngineer stated that he did not consider the roof lines in connection
~oith the drainage p1an. 'The Engineer stated that he is satisfied that
drainage has been properly taken care of..
Page -7-
MINUTrS
Ci.ty Council
May 8, 1985
Little Canada Mr. IlLesener pointecl out that water from the K1ein's roof itself, could
Mini-Storage cause her to have water i.n her basement. Mr, Stenger cannot. be expected
(Cont.) to talce care of. this.
Mrso Scalze suggested that the Gngineer review the drainage plan again,
and take the roof. lines into consideration at the same time.
Mr. Pahey felt that action on the plans should be tabLed until the next
meeting to give the Engi.neer an opportunity to loolc at the plans.
Mr. Stenger stated that he has a Copo of the area that he can give to
the Engineer..
Mr. rahey asked the Council's feelings for the placemenC of one parlcin~
space at [he baclc of the office building, so that Mr. Stenger could provide
a green Uuffer next to the Klein property.
Mr. Coll.ova and Mr. Bl.esener stated that they caere in favor of this.
rahey agreed and pointed out thaC Stenger would sti11 have the LO r.equired
parlcing spaces.
Mrs. Klein asked Mr. Stenger's plans for lighti.ng, fencing of Che property
and asked the Council for their feelings on her developing her property.
Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the Klein property is a 1ot of record.
Mr. Pahey suggested that Mr.s. IQ ein take up her other concerns ~vith Mr.
Stenger. Mr. Stengez stated that he is willing to do whatever is necessary
to keep Mrs. Klein happy.
Mrs. Nardini asked if Stenger has considered the purchase of the K1ein
property. Mr. Stenger stated that he has asked her what she would be
willing to sell iC for and she has asked how much Stenger would be will'zng
to pay for it.
Mrs. Klein stated that she would Like Mr. Stenger to make her an offer. for
her property.
Section 5 Mr. Pahey opened the public hearing on the Section 5 Industrial Park
PUI) }learing PUD designation. Fahey explained that after the hearing was called for
the Council was advised by the Planner and City Attorney that the
Agenda designation may not be appropriate as the City would not have the control
Item No. 8 it is seeking an d any use listed in th e zoning ordinance would be appro-
priate.
Fahey reported that, therefore the City has decided to call a public hearin~
for May 22 on the establishment of a ne~a zoni.ng district, to be caLled
I-P. With a new district, the City can establish the controls it i.s
seelci.ng for type of construction and outdoor. storage.
Page -8-
MzNUZrs
City Council
May 8, 1985
Section 5
Pl1D F[earing
(Conte)
Mr. nlesener introduced the following resolution and moved its actoption:
R~SOLUTION N0. 85-5-213 - CLOSING THE PUI3LIC
IIEARING ON TIIE SGCTION 5 PUD RL'7.ONING PROPOSAL
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
'Lhis resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 12, Page 213.
The foregoing resoiution was duly seconded by Mrs, Nardini.
Ayes (5) 131esener, Nardini, Collova, ScaLze, Pahey.
Mr. Pahey introduced the follo~oi.ng resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-214 - CALLING A PUI3LIC HEARING
L'OR MAY 22, 1985 TO AMEND TIIG ZONING CODE IIY
CREATING A NPW ZONING llISTKICT TOR SEC'TION 5
INDUSTRIAL PARK TO BE KNOWN AS I-P
The Loregoi.n~ resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze.
Ayes (S) Fahey, Scalze~ Nardini, ColLova~ 131esener..
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution Dook No. 12, Page 214.
Mrs. Scalz,e introduced the follocving orclinance and moved its adoption:
ORDINANC~ N0. 252 - AN INTERIM ORDINANCE
ESTAI3LISHING A MORATORIllM
The foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener,
Ayes (5) Scalze, Blesener, CoLlova, Nardini, Pahey.
Nayes (0).
Ordinance declared adopted.
Mr. Pahey commented that the City has to call for a public heari.ng in order
to consider amending the Comprehensive Plan to add a new zonin~ district
if I-P zonin~ is approved for the Centarville Road Area.
Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-215 - CALLING FOR A PUI3LIC
HEARING POR MAY 22, 1985 TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
Page -9-
rrzNUZr.s
cicy cou„cil
~1ay 8, 1.985
Section 5 The foregoing resoluti.on was duly seconded by P9r. Collova.
(Cont.) Ayes (5) Scalze, Collova, Nardini, Alesener, Pahey.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution Boolc No. 12, Page 215.
t3a11 Park Mr. Pahey explained the lay-out of che proposed parlc for the Centervi.lle
Proposal Road area.
(40y-439)
Agenda Mrs. Scalze commented t hat there might be some changes to the park if
Addition the baclc portion of the Dave I'rattalon e properCy can be purchased.
Nrs. Nardini suggested four. balltields rather than Eive. Mr. rahey
felt that that is what the Ci.ty woul.d proUably end up wiCh.
Mrs. Nardini. aslced if the City should take some of the property along
DeSoto in return for assessments and in ehae way not have to buy so
much property.
Fahey reminded everyone that this is a concept plan to get things going.
The Planner sug~ested that the Gity consider. looking into purchasing
the back portion of the Dave P'rattalone property, and the new ocaner
has not expanded into this area and it may leave an island of proper.ty
that might cause problems in the future.
Mr. Pranlc Prattalone suggested that the City might caant to purchase the
northern portion of Che Dave Prattalone property as well.
It was pointed out that a public hearing has been called for May 22 on
the subject of ballfields.
Colonial The Ci.ty Clerk reported that the matter of the Colonial Car Wash has
Car Wash been cancelled and they may be comi.ng in at a later daCe with a different
proposal.
Agenda
Item No. 9
Suburban Mr. Dennis 0'Connell and Mr. C. R. Hacksworthy appeared before the
Auto Body Counci.l requesting approval of an auto body license. 0'Connell will
be remodeling the Little Canada Lumber bui.ldi.n~ and puCting in a body
Agenda shop.
Item No. 10
Hacksworthy expl.ai.ned that they would have less than 10 vehi.cLes stored
on the site for only a few days at a ti.me, cohen [he shop is working on
these cars.
Page -10-
MINUTES
City Council
May 8, 1985
Suburban Mrs. Scalze asked what would be done with auto parts. Alr. 0'Connell
Auto ~ody replied that they have an enclosed dumpster in whi.ch auto parts are
(Cont.) disposed of.
The City Clerk asked if the building had to be sprinlclered. Mr.
llacksworthy replied that the buildi.ng will Ue sprinklered. klacksworthy
also reported that a new concrete floor w:ith drains wi11 be installed.
'Phe office area will be redone and carpeted. The inside of the bui.ldi.ng
will be compleLely new.
Mr.. 0'Connell reporCe~ that his auto body shop will not Ue in the
business of buying and sell.ing cars. Therefore, there would not be
a proUlem ~oith outdoor storage of cars. Also, any cars stored outside
would be parked within a screened storage area and would be Chere for
no Longer than 5 days.
'Che Clerk poinCed out that the current zoning of the property is
Li.ght Industrial.
The City Clerk suggested that the handicapped parking stall be moved
closer to the front door of the buildi.ng.
Council suggested that a limit be placed on the number oF cars that
could be stored outdoors at any one time. Mrs. Scalze pointed out
that the License wil.l be renewable yearly and, Cherefore, the Ci.ty
could check on this when the license application comes back.
Mr. 0'Connell requested that the limitation be 15 cars so that he has
a little more flexibility.
Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the auto body shop wi11 be located near
some residences.
Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resoluti.on and moved its adoptions
RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-216 - ISSUING AN AUTO IIODY
LICENSE TO SUBURBAN AUTO BODY WITA A LIMITATION
OP NO MORL' TIIAN 15 CARS IN TEMPORARY STORAG~ ON
THE WEST SIDE OP THE BUILDING AND SdITkt TIIE
REQUIREMENT THAT TNE BUILDING BE SPRINKLERED
The foregoing resolution was duly seconde<t by Mr. 131esener.
Ayes (5) Scalze, Blesener~ Pahey, Collova, Nardini.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolution ap;ears ?n Resolution Boolc No. 12, Page 216.
Page -11-
MINUTES
City Council
May 8, 1985
OLson Mr. ~ruce Olson appeared before the Council requesti.ng approval of an auto
Auto Repair repai.r li.cense for hi_s busi.ness at 3175 Spruce Street. Mr. Olson stated
that he has been in operation since January of 19fl4 and dicl not realize
Agenda that a li.cense was requised. Mr. OLson sCated that he had no outctoor
Item No. 11 storage and that he was a one-man operation.
Mrsa Nardini i.ntroduced the followi.ng resolution and moved i.ts adoption:
RP,SOLUTION N0. IIS-5-217 - APPROVING THli A11T0
RfiPAIR LICIiNSE RL'QUIKCSTFill 13Y EIRUCE OLSON AT
3175 SPRUCG STRE~T
The fore~oing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. I'ahey.
Ayes (5) Nardini., Fahey, Scalze, Blesener, CoLlova.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resoluti.on appears in Resolution IIook No. 12, Page 7_ll,
Richard Mr. Richard Anderson appeared bef.ore the Council regardin~ l~is proposal
Anderson to annex his property in Mapl.ewood to the Ci.ty of: Little Canada.
Property
Annexation Mrs. Scalze stated that she was not in favor ot Che annexati.on.
Scalze stated that she had a problem with developers trying to get a
Agencta better deal from cities.
Item No. 12
Pahey stated that he ~aas not opposed to the annexation if it ~aere done
by a joint powers agreement. Pahey stated that if P1aplecvood was
comfortable coith it, then it was Line with him. Fahey stated that he
would not, however, figl~t Maplewood over this property.
Mr. Anderson staCed that Mr. Richie would be in favor oL the annexation
as, then a11 his land would be in Little Canada.
Mrs, Scalze pointed out that Mr. Anderson has already a~r.eed to p,ive
access to the por.tion of the proper.ty behind him in Little Canada that
has no other access.
Mr. Anderson stated that he is puCting in se~aer and cvater to this property,
and :iC would be easier not to have to cross city boundaries. Scalze
felt there would be no problem with this.
Anderson felt that it would be si.mpler to have one city involved in most
of these problem. Anderson stated that from an engineeri.ng standpoint,
Maplewood i.s in favor of the annexation, but the Council Level may have
a different viewpoint.
Mrs. Scalze pointed out that under the Ci.ty's assessment policy, P1r.
Anderson would pay more f.or uti.li.ties because he is located in a neighboring
city C}~en if he were in LiCCle Canada.
Page -12-
MINUTES
City Council
May 8, 1985
Anderson
Property
(Cont<)
Comfort IIus
Company
Agenda
Item No. 13
Pahey aslced if lhe property was going to be developed as R-1. Anderson
replied that it was. Anderson stated tha[ he originally wanted ehree
lots, but Maple~vood has suggested che density he is proposing,
Scalze stated that she did not feel it ri.ght for a developer to annex
proPerey for a profit.
C•ahey seated that he sti11 had no problem with the proposal provided
Anderson pay 100% of his assessments. Fahey stated that the City would
gain more properCy and additional taxes.
Scalze felt that Maplecoood should be involved in this before Little
Canada is. Scalae stated that she was opposed to the proposal.
Messrs. IILesener and Collova stated that they were willi.ng to explore
the proposal. Nardini stated that she was noC opposed as long as
Maplewood is agreeable.
Pahey aslced if this caere an expens~ive pr.ocess for the City. The Attorney
replied that ie was not. Tahey felt that the requestor of the annexation
should reimburse the City for any fees involved.
Mr. Prank Frattalone stated that the proposal made no difference to him,
but pointed out that he is currently having his property replatted and
asked if this annexation would effect the replatting. 'Lhe Planner
replied that the replat would probably be complete by the time the
annexation came about.
Mr. Lee Rossell of Comfort llus Company appeared before the Council
requesting approval of site plans for his company. Kossell stated that:
they currently have 17 active buses and parking for 26. Eventually,
they would lil<e to have 30 buses.
Mr. Rossell stated that he had no problems with the planner.'s
recommer~dations.
Mrs. Scalze asked if Rossell planned on blacktopping. Rossell replied
that they c{id eventually.
Mr. Pahey stated thati the bun parlcing area should be blacktopped by
1986. P'ahey also suggested Chat the En~ineer review the drainage of
the site.
Mrs. Scalze introduced the fol.lowinp resolution and moved its adopCion:
RFSOLUTION N0. 85-5-21II - APPROVING PLANS L'Okt
COMFORT BUS COMPANY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY TIIIi
CITY ENGINGER OP T}I~ DRAINAG~ AND SUBJfiCL TO
WRITTEN APPROVAL Or EASEM~NTS AND fiNCROAC}1MEN'CS
Pa~e -13-
MINUTGS
City Council
May 8, 1985
Comfort ~lus E3Y NSP AND AMOCO WI~I~R~ NECESSARY AND THAT TI1E
Co. (Cont.) ENTIRE AREA BL' ]3LAGKTOPP~D DY TFIP END OP' Tllr
YEAR 1986 TI(AT IS USEll FOR llUS PARKSNG, AND
SUBJEC'T TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OP THE CITY
PLANNER CONTAIN~D IN FIIS R~PORT OP NLAY L, 1955
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Pahey.
Ayes (5) Scalze, Pahey, Collova, Nardini, IIlesener.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resol~tion appears in Resolution IIoolc No. 12, Page 218.
Pastorius Mr. Pastorius appeared before the Council and reported that he is
Assessment being assessed for 2 lots, when he should only be assessed for one.
Revie~o Pastorius stated that the second 1ot is not buildable.
Agenda Mr. Fahey reported that matters of this nature are turned over to
Item No. 23 the Enp,ineer for his revieco and recommendation.
Mr. Pastorius requested that he either be assessed for only one lot~
or that the City declare his lot which is 65 Leet in cvidth as buildable.
The L'ngi.neer. reported that in the past the Cicy has deferred assessments
of this nature.
Fahey suggested that the Engineerreview the matter and report at the
next Council meeCing.
rir. Pahey :introduced the following resolution and moved its adop~i.on:
R~SOLUTION N0. £35-5-219 - REFGRKING Tf[13 PASTORIUS
ASSGSSMENT TO TAE CITY ~NGINEER FOK [~IIS R~VIliW
AND RI;COMMGNllATION
The foregoing resolutr.on was duly seconded by Mr. ]3lesener.
Ayes (5) rahey, Blesener, CoLlova, Nardi.ni, Scalze.
Nayes (0),
Resoluti.on declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 12, Page 219.
Rezonin~ Ordinance No. ?53 beEore the Council deaLs with the rezoning of. the
Of Pd Ed Anderson property fronting on Park Street from ll-3 to R13.
Anderson
Property Mr. Pahey introduced the foLlowing ordinance and moved its adoption:
Agenda
Item No. 14
Page -14-
rizNU~crs
c~cy coUn~~i
May 8, 1985
Anderson pRDINANCE N0. 253 - AM~NDING TF1E ZONING COll~
Rezoning OL•' TFIE CITY OP LITTLE CANt1UA TO PROVIDE
(Cont.) CHANGL'S IN ZONING CLASSIFICA'PION
The fore~oing ordi.nance was duly seconded by Mr. Collova>
F~yes (4) I'ahey, ]llesener, Scalze, Collova.
Nayes (1) Nardini>
Ordinance declar.ed adopted.
Public The Council has before it a proposed ordinance ~ahich would place a
Di.strict mor.atorium on Community or Nei~hUorhood Centers in Public Uistrictse
Moratorium
Mrs. Scalze introduced the follocaing ordinance and moved its acloption:
Agenda
Item No. 15 OK~INANCE N0. 254 - AN INTERIM ORllINANCE
~STAI3LISIIING A MORATOR~tUM
'Lhe foregoing ordinance was duly seconued by *.Sr. I3lesener.
Ayes (5) ScaLze, t3lesener, Pahey, CoLlova, Nardini..
Nayes (0).
Ordinance decLared adopted.
Mr. Pahey suggested that the Council hold a joint meeting with the
Planni.ng Commissi.on and some public properCy o~oners to gather i.nput
as to what shouLd or should not be included under the definition of:
neighborhood or community center. I'ahey suggested that Che meefi.ng
be helct on Tuesday, May 28 at 6:30 P.M. and follow with the audit meeting
at 8:00 P.M. which has alrendy Ueen scheduled for. Wednesday~ May 29.
Mr. P'ahey introduced the following resoluCion and moved its adoption:
RSSOLUTION N0. IIS-5-220 - CALLING FOR A L10RKSIIOP
MEGTING POR TUIsSDAY, MAY ?8 AT 6:30 P,M. S1ITH TI~I~
PLANNING COMMISSION ANU CITY COUNCIL TO DISCUSS
PROPOSED DEFINITIONS OP NfiIGIIBORi~lOOD AND
COMMUNITY CENT~RS WITtI TIIE AUDIT PS~ETING TO
POLLOW AT 8:00 P.M.
The foregoing resolur.ion ~vas duly secondect by Mr. Blesener.
Ayes (5) Pahey, IIlesener, Scalze~ Collova, Nardini.
Nayes (0).
Resoluci.on decLared adopted.
This resol.uti.on appears in Resolution Dook No. 12, Page 220.
I'ahey stated that he wouLd lilce to invite representatives of the School
District to the meeting and other publicly-zoned property owners.
Fahey suggested thaC the District first submit its comments in writin~
as well as the square footage brealcdown by use of Pairvieco.
Page -15-
MINUTES
City Council
May 8, 1985
Public Mr. IIlesener suggested Chat the Councilmembers talce a tour of Fairview.
District
Moratorium
(ConC.)
Thurtder Mr. rahey asked the plans for putting in Allen Avenue in the Thunder
};~y Addi.ti.on Bay Addi.tion. Mr. Frank Prattalone replied thaC this item wi11 be
discussed at the Planning Commissi.on tomorrow night. Fr.attalone
Agenda also reporCed that he has gotCen together caith Che property owners
ICem No. 25 and he has the necessary property to put Allen in with the exception
of one property, and he has the first right to purchase this proper.ty.
FratCaLone also explained that Messrs. Jespersen and Valento do not
want to build on the south side of Allen. Frattalone stated that he
cannot p,et his cost out of the roa<1 unless Jespersen and Valento se11
him lots on the end along Allen. PratCalone pointed ouC that without
ALlen Avenue, the area cannot develop.
Mrs. Scalze commented that i.t was too bad that all the roads could not
be put in at the same Lime. Frattalone stated Chat the property owners
do not wanC to have to pay assessments on the property, until they are
ready to se11 it.
Mr. P'ahey commented that the Ci.ty is not going to force this road in.
Prattalone also stated thaC he would put sewer in wi.th the street in
order to service the houses along Allen.
Mrs. Scalze pointed ouC that the wallcing easement that the CiCy required
of Mr. Cecka is not shown on the plati.
Mr. Pr.attalone stated Chat he was trying to determine i.f the City was
willing to go along with his putting in the road to the west. Scalze
stated that she saw no probl.em with the proposal as long as Mr. PraCtalone
has the agreement of the property ocaners.
The City Clerk sCaCed that Frattalone wi11 have to obtain easements for
the road as nothing has Ueen dedicated for Al1en. The Clerk stated
that the Attorney will also have to checlc titLes.
Tahey suggested that Prattalone would have to come back wi.th the easements~
a signed developer's agreement for. the road and secoer and then the City
would be in a posiCion to give concept approval. Fahey aslced if the
street had to be renamect<
'Phe Clerk poinCed ouC that Chis has already been done.
Tahey also pointed out that the walking easement would have Co be showne
Scalze stated that the cul-de-sac was going to exCend into the park,
and the blacktop~ing of the cul-de-sac was going Co Ue done Uy the
developer. Scalze also felt that there was discussion about this being
fenced as ~vell< Scalze suggesCed that the minutes be checked in thi.s regard.
Page -16-
KINUTES
City Council
March 8, 19f35
Thunder Bay 'Che Cl.erk asked if iC would be better for the City to handle the whole
Addi.Cion project. The Jingineer stated that Al.len Avenue wi11 be an expensive
(Cont.) sCreet to put in with about a $13,000 ~ssessment per lot.
Mr. Frattalone stated that tie could put the street in for considerably
less cost, Prattal.one felt that the cost of ALlen should be distri.buted
among the lots to the north and south because without Al.len, there would
be no loCS.
Prattalone stated that if he put Che street in, the project will go.
Othercaise, he f.elt that the people wi.ll vote against the project if tihe
Ci.ty does it as they do not want the assessments.
Mr. Frattalone sCated that he wil.l come baclc on the 22nd wi.th the additional
information the City wants.
Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the Sophie and Peterson plan does not appear
to fiL in ~oi.th Che parlc plan Lor Che area. The Engineer reporCec( that he
discussed this with Sophie and Peterson. Scalze suggested that in the
future, developers in this area be shown a copy of the park plan.
Street Li.ght Mr. Blesener reported that the City has had two requests for street
Ruth & li~hts. The f.irst is for Ruth Street between 2560 and 2561 Ruth
Demont StreeC. Thi.s has already been ordereda '1he other is f.or the corner
of Ruth and Demont. Blesener reported that Itoger Glanzer is r.ecommending
A~enda that this second light be orde red.
Item No. 18
Mrs. Scalze asked the cost ot putting up a street light. Blesener
repli.ed thaC it does not cost anythin~; to put up a li~ht, the City
just pays for the electri.cal.
Mrs, Nardini pointed out that Roger will be studying if the City can
eLi.minate some lights.
Mr. IIlesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLllTION N0. 85-5-221 - ORDERING A STRGi:T
LIGI~IT FOR THG CORNER OP RUTI~i AND DEMONT STRG~TS
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. ScaLze,
Ayes (>) 131esener, Scalze, Nardini, Fahey, Collova.
Nayes (0).
Resolution decl.ared adopted.
This resolution ap~ears in Resolution Boolc No. 12, Page 221.
Page -17-
MINUTI';S
Ci.ty Council
May Fl, 1985
Temporary Mr. F3lesener reported that the City has received 28 applications for i.ts
Part-time temporar.y parC-time position. 131esener stated that he woulct be reviewing
Posi.ti.on Che appLications wi.th Roger Glanzer, but Glanzer would be makin~ the
final decisi.on,
A~enda
Item No, 18
Utility Blesener reported that street sweeping began in the City th'is week and
Reports so far the City has had three sweepers working for three days. The
sweeping will Ue completed by the end of the week.
131esener reportect that the Public [dorlcs Superintendent will. be requesting
the County to stripe various City streets during 1985. 'Phi.s is an annual
project and i.s budgeted for. PstimaCed cost is $2,500.
Jetting Mr. I~lesener reported that the City has submitted a bid f.or the jetting
Machin~; machine Chat Maplecvood is offeri.ng for sale. However, the PuUlic Works
Superi.ntendent has located another machi.ne already mounted on a truck
Agenda in Porest Lake that is for. sale. The truck and machine are adverCised
Item No. 18 at $18,000. The truck is a 1972 and has 36,000 miLes on it.
Blesener reported that he anct the Public Wor.ks Superintendent have
discussed offering $14,000 for Chis truck. 'Che machine does not have
a root blade and thati would have to be purchased separately.
IIlesener reported that the Maplewood machine, after Che City located a
truclc to mount it on, may cost the City $12,800. This i.s Roger Glanzer's
estimate. "Phe Ci.ty would save time in trying to get Che P4aplecvood
machine together and mounted on a cruclc. Iilesencr reported tha[ there
is abouC a$2,000 diLference between the tcoo proposals.
Mr. Fahey stated that he felt that the City should follow throu~h on the
Maplewood deal and try to avoid spending the extra money, if possible.
Fahey aslced when these bids would be opened.
Mr. 131esener thought that they wouLd be opened early next weelc,
Nardini poi.nted out that the other eruclc i.s ready to go. Scalze stated
that the $12,800 is only an estimate and the savings to the City could
be Less or more.
]~lesener reported that Glanzer felt that the truck i.n Porest Lake was a
better set-u~ because the truclc had a shorter wheel base, and has been
set up f.or this purpose from day one.
Page -18-
MINUTFS
City Counci.l
May 8, 19H5
Jetti.ng Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
Machine
(Cont.) RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-222 - AUTHORI7ING ROGER GLAN'LER
TO MAKE AN OPFI:R TO TI~E FORPST LAK~ FIRM IN THE
A!:OONT 4F :p14,000 FOR TI{EI1.2 JETTING SET-l7P
The fore~oing resol.ution was duly seconded Uy Mrs. Nardini,
Ayes (4) Blesener, Nardini, Scalze, CoLLova.
Nayes (1) I'ahey.
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution 13oolc No. 12, Page 222.
Mr. Filesener. asked if the City had to foll.ow State regulations in callin~
for bids in a purchase of this nature. The City Attorney pointed out that
it is a used piece of equi.pment that is involved ~nd as such, Che
competiti.ve biddi.ng process is not necessary.
Country Dr. Mr. fllesener pointed out Chat the worlc on Country Drive will be starting
Water on Monday. Illesener pointed out that there is cvatermain on the south
Extension side of the street, but none on the nor.th.
Agenda Also, there is a lot in this area owned by the City of St. Pau1 that
Addition they will ~robably be selling.
I3lesener suggested that watermain shoulct be extended to thi.s area to
service th.is lot~ Dick & Mary's and the Vadnais Inn, if they desire.
Mr. Pahey felC thi.s was a gooct idea and asked i.f this would be paid
for from general revenues.
The Lngineer stated that his guess would be that it would cost $7,000
to extend the main.
Mr. Pahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-223 - AUTHOftI7.ING A CHANGE-
ORDER 'LO INSTALL IdA'LI;RMAIN ACROSS COUNTRY DRIVL'
AT OR NEAR DICK & MAKY'S
The foregoi.ng resolution was duly seconded by Mr. ColLova.
Ayes (5) Pahey, Collova, Nardini, Scalze~ I~lesener.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution IIook No. 12, Page 223.
Page -19-
MINUTES
City Gouncil
May 8, 1985
Watermain Mr. Fahey stated that the City's intent is that the cosC of the
Extension impr.ovement would be charged against the future users of the Line
(Cont.)
The City CLerlc stated
that in order to assess the cost, ,
the City
would have to have a public hearing.
The City Attorney stated that if the cost is in the form of a comiection
charge, then a public hearing i.s not necessary. 'The Attorney stated
that connecti.on charges are not <tetermined by benefit.
Mr. Pahey asked if the City could r.ecoup i.ts costs in the form of a
connection ch2rge for this improvement. Attorney r.eplied that i.t could.
Building Mr. Collova requesCed thaC if Councilmembers have any zoning problems
Reports they are aware of, Co bring them in for discussion.
Agenda
Item No. 19
13usiness Mr. Pahey sCated that he felt that the City should license all businesses
Licenses in the City, even those that are already licensed by [he State.
Agenda The City Attorney pointed out that the purpose of the City's licensing
Item No. 20 ordinance is eo identify what types of businesses are in town, not to
regulate these bus:inesses.
The Ciky Clerlc staCed that he has had one instance cohere a busi.ness did
not feel that he should need a license from the City anct pointed out Chat
apartment buildings are bus.inesses, and the Cicy does not License these.
Mr. Pahey instructed that the Clerk should continue to issue bus.iness
licenses and enforce the ardinance as best he can.
Approval Of Mrs. Scalze introduceci the following resolution and moved its adopti.on:
General
llusi.ness I2ESOLUTION N0. 85-5-224 - APPROVING THli POLLOWING
L:icenses 1985-L986 GENSRAL BUSINESS LICENSES:
ANGELA'S HAIR AND 'PANNING, LTD., EXPRESS CUTS,
Agenda D AND ~, INC., LITTLE CANADA BARBERS, ~ORTIt
Item No. 21 SUBURBAN ECARA'P~, TONY'S HAIR FASHIONS, FINASERV, INC.,
RAINAO[d FOODS, SPEEDY MARKG'1'S, INC., i30AT ANU
MOTOR MAR'L, I~URGfiR KING, CARE CLEANERS, CATHELEN
INTERIORS, COLONIAL CAR tiJASI{; CONTINL.NTAL 13AKING CO.,
PLAM~I3URGliR, G-C SHARPENING, HIGEILANUfR CLEANING CEN'1'ER,
McDONALDS, PIZZA I~IUT, RADiO St3ACK, WARDROBE, S'I'GRLING F~VCE,
DOMINO'S PIZZA, INSTPLUT~ FOR MOTIVATIONAL DEVELOPML'NT,
DA'PA PROCESSING CENTRE, FREGLANCT PROFlSSIONALS, PAMILY
VIDEO GALLERY, OUTBOUNll TRAVEL, THF; BARf~ER SHOP,
13UDGET POWGR, TOMASSO'5 PI'L'l,ERIA, 0'DONNGLL CLEANERS
Page -20-
MSNU7'PS
Ci.Cy Council
May 8, 19fl5
Gener.al 'Lhe foregoi.ng resoluC:ion was duLy seconded by Mr. Fahey.
I~usi.ness Ayes (5) Scalze, Pahey, Collova, Nardin:i, 131esener.
Licenses Nayes (0).
(Cont.) Resolution declared adopted.
Thi.s resolution appears in Resolution I~ook Vo. 12, Page 224.
Mr. Fahey pointed out that the reason that the City wanted busi.ness
licenses was f.or fire inspecti.on purposes and Co £i.nd out whac types
of businesses are in Che City.
L.i.quor 'Phe Council. has belore i.t for action the vari.ous liquor ].icenses
Li.censes in the City.
( ; 5 -'~ 5
Agenda Mrs. Scalze aslced if all the establishment.s had insurance and are
Item No. 22 cur.rent wi.th the:ir taxes. The City Clerk repLied that Chey were.
Mr. Pahey felt that 211 tl~e ].i.censes should be approveclcui.th Che
excepCi.on of. ilracty's whi.ch should be tabled until the LirsC meeting
in June.
Mr. Pahey introduced the foLlowing resolution and nioved i.ts adoption:
RESOLlPTION N0. 85-5-225 - APPROVING THP FOLLOWING
19£3> LIQUOR, WIN~, GAMEROOM AND TNTER'LAINMENT
LICENSES:
ON-SALP SUNDAY I,IQUOR LICrNSES
Diclc & Mary's I3ar
Gordies Place
Hoggsbreath
Saxon Lounge
Venetian Inn
WINF.. LICLNSL
Great Shanghai.
Marco'y Pizza
OFP-St1LE NON-INTO:CICA'PZNG MALT LIQUOIt LICENSL'
flloom's Liquor.s
Pinaserve
MGM Liquor
Rainbow Poods
7-11 Store
Speedy Market
'I'ierney's, Inc.
Tom Thumb Grocery
Page -21-
~fINUTIiS
CiCy Counci.l
May 8, 19fl5
Liquor ON-SAIP' NON-INTOXICATING MALT I.IQUOR LICI3NSL
Licenses Great Shangha~i
(Cont.) t4arco's Piz2a
Pizza Hut
OFP-SALG I,IQUOR LICENSES
~.~loom's Liquor.s
MGM Li.quor
Ti.erney's Inc.
ON-SALE LIQUOR LICI?NSF,S
Didc & Mary's
Gordies Place
FloggsUreach
Saxon Lounge
Venetian Inn
The fore~oing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Collova.
Ayes (5) Pahey, Collova, Nardini, Scalze, E~lesener.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resoluti.on appears in I2esolution 13ook No. 12, Pa~;es 2?_5 and 226.
Brady's Mr. Pahey introduced the following resolut.ion and moved its adopCion:
Liquor
I.i.cense RESOLtJTION N0. 8.i-5-226 - TAI3LING ACTION ON
BRADY'S ON RIC~ STREET LIQUOR, GAM~ROOM AND
Agenda PN'LFRTAINMENT LiCENSES UN'LIL '1'lIE PfRST COU~CIL
Item Noe 7_2 MEETING IN JUNE
The foregoi.ng resolution was duly seconcied by Mrs. Nardini.
Ayes (5) Pahey, Nardini, Bl.esener, Collova, Scalze.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
~ Thi.s resolut:ion ap~ears i.n ResoLut~ion F3oolc No. 12, Page 227.
Voucher.s t4rs. Scalze i.ntroduced the following resolution and moved its adop~ion:
Agenda RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-227 - APP1.20VING THG
Item No. 24 VOUCHERS
The foregoi.ng r.esolution was duly seconded by P1r, Fahey.
Ayes (5) Fahey, Sca12e, Nardini, Blesener, Collova.
Nayes (0).
Resol~tion declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution Iiook No. 12, Page 228.
Page -22-
MINUTliS
Gity Council
May 8, 1.985
Temporary
Sidewalk
Near Senior
Citizen Home
A~;enda
Addi.tion
hir. Pahey commented that he felt the City should insCall a temporary
si.dewa llc within the road righC-of-way on Marlcet Pl.ace Drive to give
senior citizens access nox'th and south.
Fahey Lelt that Che Trigineer should verif.y the r~ight-of-way. Mr. Carley
stared thaC he will talk to the Publi.c Works Superi.ntendent about this.
Pahey reported that the Market P1ace will insta ll. a sidewalk over to
the road that caill match up with the sidecvallc that the City wi11 i.nsCa11<
The C~ity's sidewallc wil.l be a temporary one and at some point will.
become permanent, when it is determined how the property in this
area wi.ll develop.
Mr. Pahey introduced the following resoluti.on and moved i.t:s adoption:
RF.SOLU'L.CON NO< 85-5-2?_8 - DIRECTING THE PUBLIC
WORKS SUPERINTENDENT 'CO iNSTALL OR tIAVE INSTALLED
AT CI7'Y EXPENSE A TEMPORARY ]3LACK'COP SZDEWALK
ALONG CI'fY RIGtI'T-OF-WAY ON MARKET PLAC13 DRIVE
GOING NORTH ANU SOUTI-I
llr.ainage
District
Agenda
Item [Vo. 26
and 27
The foregoing resoluCion was cluly seconded by Mrs. Scalze<
Ayes (5) Pahey, Scalze, I~lesener, Collova, N~rdini.
Nayes (0),
Resolution cleclared adopted.
Thi.s resolution appears in ResoluCion Boolc No. 12, Page 229.
Mr. Fahey introduced the follocuin~ resoluCion and moved its adoption:
RESOLU'LION N0. 85-5-229 - AUTHORIZING JURAN
& MOODY 'LO PRGPARE DOCUMEN'CATION IN ORDER TO
MAKF: Ti{E CITY ONP DRAtNAGE llISTRICT
'Che foregoing resoluti.on was duly seconded by Mr. Alesener.
Ayes (5) Pahey, F3lesener, Nardi.n:., Scalze, Collova.
Nayes (0).
I2esolution declared adopted.
Thi.s resolution appears i_n Resolution 1loolc No. 12, Page 230.
Mrs. Scalze aslced if i.t was necessary to notify all properL-y ownees
in the City by mail of a public hearing on setting the City up into
one drainage di.strict. The City Cler.lc sCated that it ~oas, 'I'he
Clerlc al.so reported that he would have to checlc on the availabili.ty
of. one of the schools f.or hol<ling a public hearing of this si.ze.
The C1erk requested that the public hearing be cal.l.ed at the next
Council meeting, af:ter he has time to check i.nto this.
1'age -23-
MINUTI;S
City Council
May £3, 1985
Heather Oalcs The Engineer reported that he is not r.eady to rcepor.t on lleather Oalcs at
this ti.me.
Agenda
Item No. 28
Adjourn Mr. Pahey i.ntroduced the follocain~ resolution and moved its adoption:
A~enda RliSOLUTION N0. 85-5-7_30 - ADJOURNING
7tem No. 29
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. f3lesener.
Ayes (5) Fahey, Tllesener, Nardini, Scalze, Collova.
Nayes (0).
Resol.ution declared adopr.ed.
This resoluti.on appears i.n Resolution F~oolc No. 12, Page 231.
'.Chere being no further b~siness, the meetiing was adjourned at approximately
11.:15 P.M.
[tespectf.ully submitted,
~ ~~~ (
~ /~ (~ ~~' ~.: 1 ~ .<
Kathleen Glanzer ,~ ~
Recor.ding Secr.etary
Page -24-