My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-85 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
05-08-85 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:15:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:50:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTPS <br />Ci.ty Council <br />May S, 1985 <br />Steneroden Mr. Pierce pointed out that there is a large drainage ditch running through <br />Rezoning the back of this property. Pierce felt that the City should explore a11 <br />(Cont.) avenues for the development of this property as R-1. Yierce also felt that <br /> most of the property owners cvouLd be willing to purchase the property <br /> behind their homes. <br />Mr. Collova introduced the following resolution and moved its adoptionc <br />RESOLUTION N0. 85-5-210 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON THE STENERODEN KEZONING PROPOSAL <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Nardi.ni. <br />Ayes (5) Collova, Nardini, Fahey, Scalze, ~Lesener. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This r.esolution appears in Resolution Uoolc No. 12, Page 210. <br />Mr. Waite pointed out that the property wi11 develop in the future, and <br />Waite qnestioned the type of development the Gity might get at that time. <br />Mrs. Scalze suggesCed that if the r.esidents are serious about purchasing <br />the property behind their homes, that they get eogether and contact Mrs. <br />Steneroden. <br />Fahey stated that he would not rule out access from the Schrier property. <br />Flowever, Pahey stated that if all the property on Sylvan develops before <br />access can be provided, the likelihood of the property developing as <br />commercial increases. <br />rahey also pointed out to the resi.dents that Councils chan~e and a future <br />Council might be receptive to a commercial development of this property. <br />Mr. Waite asked if he brought in a reasonable development to the east, <br />if the Council would be in f.avor of commercial on the Rice Street end of <br />the property. <br />Scalze felt that if Mr. Waite came in with a proposal for the property <br />on Ri.ce Street, it should have the same boundari.es as Che other adjoining <br />property on Rice Street. <br />llon Pierce felt that a car coash woulct add r.oo much tr.affic to the area and <br />pointed out that the people have a problem getting off of Iona Lane as it <br />l.g, <br />Pahey stated that he understands tha~ the Iona Lane residents would like <br />to see a little less active of a development in that area. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the followi.ng resoluCion and moved its adopti.on: <br />Page -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.