Laserfiche WebLink
i9 f.i9U'I'I? i <br />C~i.ty Council <br />June 2~, 1985 <br />,Te:;sica 'Che Ci.ty Clc:rk reported that ~i.n return Por Mr. Pranlc T~ratttalone <br />Court i.nst:alli.ng a sani_Cary ,ewer l.~i_ft st~tion on Jessi.c~~ Court_, ttie <br />Sanitary C~i.ty ~vipect out r.i <~.lef:er~red assessment ori f~ti-. Prattalone's property. <br />Sewet <br />~Qr. Pahey i.nforrned Mr. l~raCt2ilone oE the Clerlc's Li.ntlin~;s and ~9r. <br />A~;enda Fratta].onF ind~lcaLed Cl~iat he cotis a~reeabl.c to this conclusion. <br />1:Cem 270. 7 <br />Sophi.e/ ~lessrs. Sophie and Peterson ~ipperzrecl ~ef.ore the Counc,i.l request~,ing <br />Peterson reconsideration o£ Che requisement oE putt:in; their P,roposed roacl <br />ProF~erky throuF;h Co I.,a~orc; Road. <br />Agencla Mr. 1'ahey s[atect that he lootusd at the pro~~erty ztnd l~as no prootem <br />ICem No. ; w:U.h Che provision chtit th~:. road bc extended through co Lai3ore at <br />s later. daY.e, i'al,iey also ~oint:ed ouG th~C Che road woulcl only ht~ve <br />a 7_4 Eoot mat anel Chat t'.laere are 61 feet beCO~een the >oph'i.e home <br />anct Pet.erson garztg¢. <br />P1r. ~3,1esEner sta4:ec{ Chat hc had Co sti.ck oii.th hi.s ori.ginal. fce li.ng <br />Chat t:i~e, r.oad should go Chrough to I~aTSore Road ri.~hC a~aay. Mrs. <br />Scalze apreed. <br />Nlr. F~ahey comm~nCed Chat Che mat will, probably inCerfere les5; wiC.h <br />the Soph~ie and Peterscm propert~i.es tJzan Chese o~ancrs t:tui.nk iC ~oilt.. <br />However, Pzlhcy fel.t: th~iC che Ci.Cy cou].cI be LLex:i.ble ~.i.n Chi.s maeter. <br />i3lesener. stated that he thinlcs, ChaC Che Citq has had too rnany ttii.ii;s <br />done I'ia1.f way i.n the past, and should avoid t.tii.s w~i-th Che Petersoii/ <br />3oph:ie propos~.i1. <br />1'~ihey stated thaC there would be a Ce>m~~orary c~il.-de-stic 500 f:eeC <br />l.ong, and tlte City could reqti~ire that t1~e pruperty owners t;reint <br />thc ro;ad easeme;nC Chrough to LaTior.e Road. A bond shoulcl al.so 6e <br />r.equired oF the properCy oconers. Pahey su~gesCed Chat the road could <br />be put i.n cahen Che 1ast: l.ot i.s sold. <br />Col.lova sCatcd thaC he wes agreeable to ~his, but: Ee1.C Chat a t;i.me <br />~erl.od of aP>oat l year shoulcl I,~e set: ~nd that thc project should <br />not ~ake 5 years. Col.lovt~ f:c1t that perh~.ips Peterson ~vanted to <br />g,enerate sorne mon<:y i.n order Co move hi, garage beEore tJ,ie. road <br />was ext:ended to Lail3or.e. <br />Faltey poi-nted out that it woul.d be less expensi.vc t:o put the road <br />~hroi.i,h ae one ti.me ancl po~intecl out that sewer aind waaCer would have <br />co l>a looped eo Lai~ore Rorad. <br />?~1rs. Scalzc i.nfoemed thc Counci.l ch~~t the ParLc Gomm~iss~.i.on has <br />recommended that .~for the safeCy oP citi.zens in Lhe atea, Ontari.o <br />shoul.d go through Lo LaBoxe. A1so, any add:i.tional propert:y would <br />i.ncrease: che 1.0% parlc land d~edication. `fLze norCherly cul.-de-sac <br />should r.eL7.ect the a<lcli.t:ional 7.0%. Scal.ze poi.nted ouC khat thie <br />parlc propFrty should line up wi.ch tkie 'Pr.~attal.one and Cecka pairlc 1~nd <br />de<ti.cat i.on. <br />1~~fl°' --;- <br />