Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Cit:y Cotmcil <br />Oct. 9, 1985 <br />Fischer D1r< Jer.ry Fi.scher. appeared before the Counci.l requesti.ng the d~i.vi.sion <br />Property of his pr.operty on Ruth Street into tcao lots. <br />Divi.si.on <br />The City C1erk reported <br />A~enda cler.k also pointed out <br />Item No. 6 property ChaC should be <br />that the division meets a11 C;~i.ty Codes. The <br />that ther.e are deterred assessments on Che <br />Levied if. the property division is approved< <br />Mr< T3lesener introduced the foll.owi.ng resolution and moved its adopti.on: <br />RFSOLUTLON N0, 85-10-493 - APPROVING TI~IL <br />FISCHI:R 1'ROPLRTY DIVISION AS PR~SI;NTL;U <br />The tor.egoing resolution was duly seconded by Ms. Nardi.ni, <br />Ayes (4) I3lesener, Narciini, Scalze, Pahey. <br />Nayes (0), <br />Resolution declared adoyted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Sook No. 17, Page 515< <br />hls. Nardini introduced the follocaing resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RP:SOLUTION N0. f35-10-494 - Tf;RMINA'CING TIiL' <br />DPPERR~D e1SSESSMk3N'L ON THT FISCHEf2 PI20PE;lYCY AND <br />RIsASSTSSING TI~IE TOTAL Ol~ $16,829.40 ON LOTS 34 <br />AND '35 <br />'Lhe foregoi.ng resolution was duly seconded by Mr, Fahey. . <br />Ayes (4) N1rdi.ni, Pahey, 131esener, Sca1•r.ee <br />Vayes (0). <br />Resolution decl.ared a<topted. <br />This resoLut:i.on appear.s i.n Itesoluti.on Ilook No. 12, Page 516, <br />Request I'or Mr< [~7il.li.am Dulcowitz appeared Uefore the Council requesting the <br />Vacati.on Of. vacati.on of Condi.t south of Burke Lane. <br />Condit <br />~1r. Pahey pointed out that thi.s same request was ctenied i.n 1934. Fahey <br />Agenda aslced if the Council was required to ca1.l a public hearing or could deny <br />Item No. 7 the request. Pahey pointed out that there is area that the CiCy does not <br />know how it w:i.ll develop and the City would be short-sig,h[ed to vacate <br />Condi.t Street. <br />Mr. Dulcowitz stated t:hat the area i.s onLy 30 feet wi.de an~( currently a <br />catch-all for debree< Mr. Pahey commented that Mr. Dul<owitz could <br />maintain the easement anct treat the property as his o~one If the City <br />vacated the property and then needed Co put a road in the future, the <br />City would end up paying for the easement. <br />Nardini stated to Uulcowi.tz that the easemenC is Che same as a boulevard. <br />llulcowitz could maintain the property and treat iC as his own and then <br />people would probably not dump on i.t. <br />Page -4- <br />