My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-85 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
10-09-85 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:19:34 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:50:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AIINUTI:S <br />City Council <br />Oc[. 9, 1985 <br />VacaCion Nlr. Uulcowi.tz poi.nted out that hi.s 1ot is only 60 feet wi.de in the front <br />OL Condi.t and it woul.d be hard to place a Ixouse.on the property without bui.lding <br />(Cont.) quite far ba ck. Scalze pointed out that if the lor_ i.s consi.dered a <br /> corner loC, the setback from the sicteyard would Ue 30 £eet. <br />Tahey commented that the Council. could loolc at this i.ssue f.rwn a vari.ance <br />standpoint. Nowever, Pahey did not. f'eel that this was a reason to <br />vacate khe streeC. <br />Ms. Nardi.ni stated that it appears that the Counci.l di.d not hoLd a <br />publ:i.c heari.ng i.n 19F34, but si.mpLy turnect ctown the r.equesC because the <br />Couxlci.l was opposed to the vacation. <br />Pahey stated that it is a rare case in which the City coi11 vacate a <br />publi.c s[reet. The City will only do so cohen there is no chance f.or <br />developmenC. <br />Mrs. Dulcowi.tz commented that Chere i.s a drainage di.tch in the back <br />of.' the property and asked how the road wil.l effect th~is. Fahey commented <br />that a storm sewer could be put in< <br />Scalze commented thaC there is acreage in the area that the Ci.ty does <br />not know how it will develop, Scalze scated that the Council does not <br />wanC to put the Ci.ty i.n a bind if T.he area develops in 30 years, <br />Nardini pointed out that Mr. Duko~oitz caould have to pay for a public <br />hearing and i.t does not loolc lilce l~~e has the votes necessary to vacate <br />the street. <br />Fahey stated that he was wi.lling to look at the variance issue separatel.y <br />because of the narrowness of: the lot. <br />ScaLze sug~ested that Dukowitz tallc to the liuilding Inspector about the <br />development of his properCy. <br />Kr.. Fahey intr.oduced the f.olLowing resoluti.on and moved i.ts adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0, 85-10-495 - DBNYING 'CHL I2liQU~ST <br />OF WILLIA'i.K DIJKOWITZ FOR A PU'BLIC HE;ARING ON TtIG <br />VACATION OP CONDIT S'PREET SOUTH Ol' BURCCL' LANL <br />The for.egoing resol.ution was duly seconded by Mrs, Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) Fahey, Scalze, Nardini., F3lesener. <br />Nayes ~0)• <br />Resol.uti.on declared actopted. <br />This r.e.solution appears in R~soLution 13ook No. ]2, page 517. <br />Ms, Nardi.ni suggested that when there are refererices to past minutes <br />in the Council. a~enda, they be i.ncluded in the aorrespondence Lor the <br />benefit of. the new Councilmembers. <br />Page -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.