My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-85 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
10-23-85 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:48:24 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:50:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M:INU'fES <br />Ci.ty Council. <br />Oct. 23, 19E35 <br />Sinclai.r <br />(Cont.) <br />~r~Xt <br />Amendment <br />Metal <br />I3ui.ldings <br />Ap,enda <br />It:em No. 5 <br />CAs< ~ardi.ni. asl<ed the staCUS of the oversi.zed curb cut. ~1r. Pahey poi.nted <br />ouC thaC it is sho.rn on the s:i.Ce plan and Che i.ntention of the motion is <br />that iC remai.n. <br />ilr. Pahey poink.ed ouC tkiat: the Yl.anriing Commi.ss~ton t.abl~d action ori the <br />proposed text amendment on metal builda.ngs. Pahey further pointed out <br />that the ordi.nance allows the PLaiming Commi.ssion 60 days in which to <br />act on a subject. Mr.. l~ahey sCated thati the Planrii.n; Comm:i.ssi.ori has <br />ref.erred to the i3ui.ldin~; Inspector's l.et.ter of: September 27 which <br />was addressed to the Planning Commiss~ion. P'ahey Lelt Chat Che-. <br />Planni.ng Commission shou:Ld revi.e=.v the 1.eCter and act on Ckie propos~.t1. <br />within the guideli.nes ~i.ven them by the f3uil.ciing Off.ici.al. <br />Mr. Marlc Schultz of Park Street: a~~peared t~efore the Council., Mr. Schul.t~ <br />stated that he was not against pole bui.ldi.ngs in Chei.r. proper place, <br />buC feLt that they were a detri.ment t:o a res:i.deni;ial area, SchuLtz <br />pointed out the bu~i.ldi.ng,s whi.ch are on k'arlc SCreet and felt that any <br />addi.ti.onal >uch builctings in thi.s area ~uoul.d £urther harm the zesi.denti.al <br />k~omes on Park Street. Schul.tz stated that the buildi.ngs tenc! to be <br />uns~itely anct unma:i.ntained, <br />I~]r. Schul.Cz pointed out that: LiT.tle Canada i.s no Lon~;er a r.ural. communi.ty <br />ancl f:el.t th~it Little Canada was not the place for such Y>uilclinp,s. <br />Schultz st2ted that: LiCtl.e Canacia could use Che type bui.ldin~;s that <br />caill rai.se the r.eal. esCate val.u~s of: the City. <br />Schultz felt Chat Li.Ctle Cana~la must: deci.de where it wants to go. Does <br />t:he City want pcarm~nent bui.ldings or poLe buildings. <br />Kr. DeLonais stated that the Pl.anning Comrnission consi.dercct the leCter <br />from tl~c 13uildi.ng Ins~~ector as being ad~ressed to T.he Council, <br />Mr. Collova r.eporCe<t that .1r. Qu:irin would like a chance to spealc qn Chis <br />subject, however, was noY present at the meeting. Fahey stated that <br />Mr< Qu:ir:in could be schectuled to speak eit Ckie meeting where Che Counci.l <br />talces acti.on on the text amendment. <br />P1r. ]ll.esener introduced the following resoluti.on and rnoved i.CS adoption: <br />RF.SOI,VLION N0, 85-10-513 - CLOSING 'CL-ili POBI~IC <br />(~ItiARING ON THli TFX'L' A~SF'NDMGNT Y}i:127'~1INI~1G TO <br />PIETAL BUILDINGS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly secorided by ~'.fs. ~ardi.rii.. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Nardini., Scalze, Pahey, Co1.lova< <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resol.ution declared adopted. <br />Thi.s resolution appears in Kesoluti.on Bod~c No, 12, Page 535. <br />Page -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.