The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-04-85 Council Special MinutesP+IINUTES OF THE SPECI/~L P4EETIPIG CITY COUNCIL LIT7LE CFlNIIDA, itIUN~SOTA December 4, 19£35 Pursuant to due call and notic2 thereof a special meeting of the Council of the Cit/ of Little Canada, Minnesota ~aas held on the 0.th day of December, 19£~5 in the Council Chambers of the City Center 1ocated at 515 Litl:le Canada Road in said Cit,y. Mayor h1ichae1 Fahey called the meeting to order at 5:45 P.P~1. and the follotaing mernbers a~ere present a't roll call: P~tEP1[3ERS PRFSENT: P~ayor Mr. M9chael Fahe,y Councilman P~r. 4lilliam k3lesener Councilman Mr< Rick Collova (arrived b:00 P.f~.) Counciloioman ~1rs. Beverl,y Scalze P9EP93ERS ABSE~IT: Councilwoman h9s, Mugs Nardini ALSO PRcSENT: City Clerk P1r. Joseph Chlebeck Recording Secretary t~1rs. Kathleen Glanzer The purpose of tonight's special Counci1 rneeting is to receive bids on the refunding of outstancling General Obligatinn Improvement 3onds of 1~8?. f•1r. Brad Farnam of Juran & Moody presented the Council a summary of recent bond sales. Farnam explained the handout. P~1r. Fahey as!ced ~~~hat the City's bond ra~Cing was on this issue. Farnam replied that he has not received it as yet, but expects it to be E3AA-1. Next Farnam passed out a tabulation of bids. Three bids uvere received. They were from First Nation~l k3an!< of St. Paul and of Plinneapolis at an interest rate of f3.03II0%; NorE~iest Investment Services at an ~nterest rate of 7.B£35~t~; and from American N~tional C3ank at an interest rate of 7.3733%. Farnam explained that the notice of sale al1owed the Cit.y the f1exibility 'to increase or decrease the refunding bonds by $95,000. Therefore, Farnam recommendecl that the City av~ard a~7,000,000 refunding bond. Farnam passed out a summary of the bond issue and reported that by awarding this refunding bond, the City wili save ~490,000 over the life of the issue. Farnam reported that lie spent the afternoon with the City Auditor, h1r. Robert Voto, going over this proposa1, and it a~~as Voto's recomm2ndation that the City issue the reftmding bond based on f~1r. Farnam's proposal. Voto also pointed out that this refunding bond fits in with his efforts to recluce tax levies in the City. Fahe,y asked what the actual savings 4vould be to t'ne City. Fl representative of Juran and t~oody replied that present value savings evould be ;~4HII,000. Page -1- r~z~!uTes City Counci1 C)ec. 4, 1985 Mr. Fahey pointed out tnat a~ a previous Council meeting t'ne Council e~as informed that there avould be a$?_0,000 savings to the City. 7he Juran and t4oody representative exptained that the present val~.ae savings k~ere $~90,OOD to the City. He then stat~cf that the net savings d~~ere ~14f3,000. Two E~aeel<s ago the actual savings vaere approximately $?_O,Q00. Today they are approximately gE3,000 because the City is not using much money to invest on an unrestricted basis. Mrs. Scalze asked what the bottom line difference ~•aas between the ne~a bond ~ssue and the E~onds oF 1932. Juran anc! Mooc!y replied that present value savings were $4IIf3,000 and as the City a~as receiving $340,0~0 of its ovm money the net gain for the City aeould be $140,000. FloN~ever, iP just issue costs Gdere considered, the savings woutd be a(~,000. Ji.iran and hloody also pointed out that the City is ab1e to lower current tax levies through the refunding. 7he issue is structured specifically for this purpose. P~ir. !31 esener i n'troduced the fol 1 os~ii ng resol uti on and r~ioved i ts adopti on: RESOLUTIOP.I N0. 85-12-56~i - ACCEP7IPJG THE 6ID OP! SF1Lf•_ Of $1 ,0 0,000 GENER,4L Ot3LIGATI0P1 RflVt1NCE Rl:FU~aDING 30NDS OF 1935 Aq1D PROVTbIidG FOR 7hIEIR ISSUAtdCE The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. Flyes (4) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, rahey. Pdayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution (~ook ~Io. 12, Pages fi05 thru 622. f4r. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RFSOlUTIO~I PlO. F~5-1?_-569 - ADJOURt~lING The fore~oinq resolution U~as duly seconcled by ~1r. E3lesener. ~yes (4} Fahey, 3lesener, Scalze, Collova. Playes (~). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution ~SOOk aJo. 12, Page 623. 7here being no further bi.~siness, the meeting 4vas adjournecl at fi:07 P.ih. Respectfully su6mitted, '~f~.~C(:L!~lC-~~C~C~t(-sl~ -~~._l I<athleen Glanze , Recordin, Secretary Page -?.- ('IIidUT~=S Oi THt: RF.GUL~R "1EETI?dG f,T.TY COUidCIL LT7TI_E C~!dADFl, P'IITINESOTti Der,ember 11, 19n5 F~genda I~:em Pdo. 1 Agenda Item ilo. 'L Pursuant to tl~.ia cal l anct noti ce thereof ~ re,yui ar meeti ng of tYie Coi.mcil of ~he City of Little Canaada, Plinnesnta was held on the llth day of December, 19a5 in the .f,ounci1 Chamb~rs o~f ~CI7e City Center located at 51C~ I_~ttle Canada I',oad in sai~1 Ci4:,y. i~'ayor P~iichael Fahey chaired the it~eeting ~~rid ca1~led i~P. to order 1t ~:30 P.C~. ancl tPie fo11o~~ing members ~Fiere present at ro11 call: ',;F,,~~3F..RS ~'RFSfidT 11LS0 PRES(:P1T rqayor Councilman Counci 1 srian Counr.ilvaoman Counc~ilwoman C1tv C~CP!C City Engin2er City l~ttorne,y Ci'ty Planner Recording S~cretary P~1r. P~lichael ~ahe.y ~1r. ;~ti 11 i are Ql es~ner P1r. Ric;c Collova ;~1s. P1ugs IJarclini i+lrs. f3everiy Scalze "e1r. Joseph C~~lebecl< i~ir. Oonald Carley ~~r. Thomas Seieeney ~'lr. St^ve {lri ttman ''irs. Kathleen G1anzer Approv~l Mrs. Scalze ind~catec that on page 6, 6th parac~raph of the ~lovember nf 7he ?_b Council mce~ing hiinutes, ~~~?r. "1orelan's conments s'no~,ild be correcten ?iinutes to reflect t'nat t'rie City ~~ioul<! negotiate for the purchase of the hoc!<e~~ rinl<s at Kel1ong High ;chool. Acjenda Itern T:.o. 3 r9s. Pdardini indicated that on plqe 5, lst paraqraph, second sentence, 1:he viord "rent" shoulc( he amended to "using". ~lso, refcrences made to Juran R i~~1oody as ~3ound Counsel should be amended ~to "~oncE RepresenCat~ve". "1s. Plardini introduced the fol1o~~~ing resol~.ition and rnoved its acioption: RESOLUTIO\ ~40. t35-12-570 - AP~ROVIPI(', TNf P~iINUTI$ OF TfIE PlOVE1~IBER ?6 COUPICIL I'~[:~TIPIC 4!I7H TIiE OUTLIN~D CORRECTTONS 7he for~c,oing resolution s~ias duly >econcled by "4r. Collova. 11yes ( 5) A!ardi ni , Co'i l ova, FaY~ey, Plardi ni , Scal ze. iJayes (O). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution aopears in R~~solution Book ~!o. 1?., Paqes 62~! and f2'.~• ?~r. B1 esener i ndi cated that the December 4~n~i nutes s~~oul c( be amFnded to in<ficated that the Council aaaarcled the lo~v bid of ~~merican ~lational in the bonc' s~le for the re~f~inding of General Obiigation 3o~nds o~f 19i3,.'.. ~aqe -1- i•9I PdU7F S City Council Dec. 11, 19~5 fi!inutes P~9r. C,ollova ~introduced the fol1ov~ing resolutionandr~oved ~its adopt~ion: (rc?nt. ) RESOLUTIOPI N0. £35-12-571 - APPROVIIJG TIIF f4INUT~SJF Tfi[ D~C~~1f3ER 4, 19H5 S°FCIFlL COUMCII_ ~1FETTPI(?~ ldI7H TN~ OU7lI~dED ,4DDI7ION The foregoing resolu~t~on was duly seconcled by P~1r. 3lesener. 1\yes (~) Collova, Rlesrner, Scalze, ~aYiey, Ilardini. ~layes (0). ResoluCion declared ac~o~~ted. 7'riis r~solution a!~pears in Resolution f3ook :'~lo. 12, Paqc f25. Rutxic;c F~hey opened ~the Mr puhlic hearinq on the rezoning oP the Fl~rbert and Proposal . '-rv~in !~fint2r propert y and the r.xpansion of the Ri.itzic!< PUD to include the !~ac!: portion of the Ilinter pro~~Earty. Aqenda 4 Item iio S~1s. Pdardini rer~orted that she receiv~d a call from P~1r. ~_.~ e~ of Iona , lane sta~ting that he s~as ~11 and coiild not attend the meeting, hut that he vias oppose~l to i:he Rutz~ic!< proposal. ~aney reported that this Siearinn is a result of several differ^nt hearinns and ,aorl<shops. On Dlov2riber 13 Che City approved a site pl~n for Pir. Rutzic!<'s oroposal conting~nt upon man~ different reouirements such as the nossibility of senior citizen apartmenls ancl F^ncing. On ilovemher 2u the Coi.mcil gave preliminary approval to industriai revenue bonds for tne proposal. The ~urpose of t~ie hearinc~ is for the Council to decide vanether or not to incorporate as part of the project, th~ 4;inter pronerty. This vras a contingency added to I.iitzid:'s original proposal. The Council was concerned t'riat clue to the develo~ment of the Cardinal pro!~erty, the 4linter pr~perty wou1 d becorne 1 an<I1 oc!<eel. tir. cahey pointed out tnat 1;he Planninc; Corirnission voted 7 to (l to cleny the PUD and recoinmenc!ed that a stepped-d.o~~n zoning on the S~linter proper~ty be r.onsidered. The Planninn Coi=imission did not recommend that i:he 1!inter ~roperty rt~mairi R-1, but rather some type oF transitional zoning. P~hey reporteci ~tha'c the Council has C4ioroughly reviea~~ed the P1anniny Cor;in~~ssion meetinc~ minutes an~( t~e has spoken ind~vidi.ially ti~ith ~lanninr Cornmission niembers an~ Mr. Ru~CZir,l<. Rutzic!< adviseci !=ahey in th~se co~~v~rsations that he is not interested in r~sidential devel oE~ment on the bac!~ ha1 f of the I~li n ter oroperty. hie i s a1 so not interested in saorlcinc~ ~,s~i'th st~pped-down zoning because of the size of the property involved, th2 project would not be financially fe~s'ible. Flr. Ted 3erg,troci of Iona Lane anci re{~resenting the tona Lane residarrt>, appeared bcfore the Council. ~erqstrom r~nort~d that ;~9r. Do,jni!< could Ptxc~e -'L- t1INUTES ri~y Council Dec. 11, 1905 ~2i.itzici< Pronosal (Corrt. ) noi: b~ present at the in~eti ny, aut that he su{>porteci ~s~e oosi ti on o~F tf7e Iona Lane residents. 5ergstro~7i r~ported that ht~ has lived on Iona Lane for 23 years and m~vecl into the area d.ue to the excellent sc4iools and uncongest~d living. Berc~strorn had t~rio concerns ancl of~Fcred som~ poss~blE~ sol~.itions. The first c.oncern ~tas f.he tr2nd to builci aoartments in LiY.tle Canada. 13ergstrom felt that the nro~ortion of peoE~1e living in apartments has gone up Cremendously and ~that tne City is becorninrj a renting, ~transient, non-o4~mer sing1e parent community. 3erqstrom pointed out that 1:his ~trend has not losaereci ~tax~s, nor improved tti^ quality of schools in tt~e City. 13erqs~rom F~ointed out tha~ P1rs. Tir,mions of ~the Planning Comrnission veriPiec! this posif,ion and reported that Little Cana.da has an overs•rhelr.ii ng n~unber of T i ti c I chi 1 dren. B~rgstrom pointed oi.it that this oroposai involves the rezoning of ~2-1 property in order to c>uild 156 apartni^nt units. Bernstrom asked tihe ~ity's objection for doing so. 5~rc;stra~i P~lt that this trend is leading to poorer schools, ninher tax~s and a non-rn;rned coi~rnunity. The second concErn of Iona I_ane is the three-story apartment b~ril<i~inq on the Y;inter property. 43~rystrom offerFd~ 1;4ie fo1lo~ving so1i.itions: T'ne first e~lould be biailc!ing tosdnhoiises of a maxi~num rieight of one and one-half stories on th~ nort'n nortion of the !Jinter nrop~~rty ~;tith a one hundred foot buffer zone of tihich 75 fe^t ~,rould rernain untouci~~d. The second choice t~~ould !~e sorae sort of transitional zoning liy nlacing sinc!1~ family housing on th~ l~linter property ~,vith a stre2~ easement shared by fihe S~'inter and Ca•rc~ina1 proUerties starCinn on L.il:tle Canacla Road. To~.,mr~ouses could bra locatEC! on th~ north side of t~~e street and the remainder of the Card.inal property develope<I per t'ne existing zoninq. The third ciioice would bc~ to indivi- <lually purr_'nase the ~linter land in qu2stion. The propert,y o~mers on Iona Lane orrning Lots ~f, 5, 6, 7 ancl ~ have aqreeel to proceed a~ith this alternative shoi.ild the tirst and second choicrs 4e re;ected. >ergscrorn staCe<l that ati th the ap~~ropri at~ road e~sesuents, the osaners can match or nearly r+~atch the pric~ offered by ?4r. RuCzir.'r.. ThEre are o'cher alt~rnatives such as nark land ~r senior citiz~n apart~neni;s vdhich Iona lane consi c!ers to b? 1 ess desi rai~l ~. ?3erqstrom felt i:hat a. tnree-story anartment i~~.iildinn nnxt to Iona Lan2 ~.•iotild ~iiolat2 good nlanninc and tii^ residents' trust in the City. l3ergstrom ~~as iri favor of the recois~~*ienefation of the Plannin~ Cominission for some typ;a of st~r~n°d-dot~m zoning. t1r. `lles~ner e•r.uressec! c~ncern s~it'n alternati~re thre~ in that if Ri.rtzick develops ti~e Cardinal property and in the future the Ioria Lane peop1e s:r~inted to develop t'nc bacl< of tlie Slinter property, ~th~re may be a problem in ass:~ssing thr-. cost of the str2et. Qerc~stro~n stated that by purchasing this property, ~th2 Iona Lane residenis Paye _3_ 'fI"IUT~ ; Sity Counci1 Dec. 11, 1~35 Rutzick ~iould be preservinc~ the valur_ o; their properY,y. The pro~erty is not 1'ro~osa1 as valuabl~ to the Iona Lane R2sirlents as it is to P,r. Rui:zick as Rutzic!< (Cont.) ~vould have a commercial b~nefi~C in the prnperT.,y. 1=ahey poi~ited out that tn~ ass2ss;nen~Cs ~~io~ald not `>e shared for the ,tr^et as th~ street ~rould not henefit Rutzicr. Fahey as!<ed if the neighbors ~z~ere interested in purchr.isinn ~the property for o~en space ~:iithout assuranc^ of a roads•ra.y 1:o tlevelop th~se lots. ~erqstrom thougYt th~t ~he rasidents would still be interested, but ~then felt that th° vali.~e o~F tr~e propert~ o~ould have to be reciuced. Berqs~ro.7i stated 'chat ~h~ pro~erty had no economic re~~~ard for 'cher,~, but by purchasing the property, ~he Iona Lane r^sidents s~rould. jiast b~ preserving ~Y,he value they currently have. F'aViey staLe~i ~that 1ie 'cti~uc~ht at; the 1~?st me~ti nq the Courici 1 hel tl ~ii t~i Iona L1n~ ~that ~th2 resici~n~s iver•e r~asonably satisf~ietl ~ith a 100 foot buf(~r zone. "ergstrorn stated tnac tiie residents vrere never qiven t'ne choice. The only choic~ presented ~,~tas :rhe~ther the buffer zone tivoulc! he 75, 100 or 12Ei f~et. Fahey felt that th~ transit.ional zoninr ~,~Eas not as desirable as ~;he buffer becaus:~ usual1y transitional zones occur ai: rear lot lines. ~ernstrom pointed out that his ontion +`1 ~ioulc? have transitional zoning at re~r 1o~t lines. f32rg~~trom also stated that they ~ioul~l lil<e a buf~fer zone in exrhange for upzoning to a f,rans1tion~~1 aone. Fahey feli: t'n~t ths~ property was no~t wi<le enough to nrovide Por a buffer r_one pl us <level onment on the hii nter property. ~ Ir. '3ergstro~n di sagreed. rahey asl<ed if the neighborhoocl has completely r:~jected the icf;~a of a bi.~~Pf~r zon~? 3ergs~trom stated t'na~t a 3~~ Toot 'ni~h apartment building 1 DO feet a~;vay from t9iei r property 1 i nes bAroi.il d clrval i,~e Che property. 7hcr~ saould be the loss of privac,y, the buffer zone ~,!o~.ild attract '<ids and debree. `D2rgstror.~ stated tFiat th2y ~-!ou1d nr~Fer the stepped-clo!•en zoning apnroach. Berystrorn pointed out t'na~t P1rs. Tinnnons, uaho is a realtor, ~ic?rees that tl~ie aoartment t~ui 1 cPi ng +~aoul d c{eval ue the Iona l an~ pron2rty and ina'<e sale difficult. 4'a'ney q~.iestioned if ~there woi.ild be ~~~ore impact ivi~th at>ia¢~~r p~ne or ~~!it~ developm2nt i.~p to tona Lane's rear lot lines. eergstrom felt t'nat a.ny c!eveloper ~iotald preserve th~. w.oocied arca ad;jacent to th~ rear lot lines and tnis vrould en,~ance the val!ie o~f ~th~ lots. Fah^y asi:~cl the s~i dth nf the tree 1 i ne on ~he ~,~i nter properl,y. P~1r. f3ergstrom replietl thaC it «as SO ~0 100 fc~i,~;~id~e from ~h~ bac~ o~P ~the Ioria Lane lot lines. °acae -~}- fIT.i1.UT[S C9ty Council Dec. 11, 1a85 Rutzicl< hir. 31es~nc~r pointed ou~t; that tne property ba~hin<) ttie C~~~rdinal property Proposal runs clown. F)arc~strom explaineci t'n~ topogr<lphy of the area. ~zergstrom (Cont.) stated that th~ aoartr»n~s ~r~ould i>e h~ighly vis~ble i'rom t'ne bac!< of the Iona l_ann ho~as~s. !3ergs'trori felt ~that ~he a~~arcrien~ts on tiie Ca~rdinal property, ~iV7ich ~~ould 'oe 200 feet avrly froin the bar,i< o~f Iona I_~ne, aaoulc( be bett~r than haviriq t~ie apar~t~n^nts 10C Feet ativa,y. Fahey as;<ed if t:he residents 'iave ciseussPCl the~r ~urchase of the property ~raith the 4~~ntFrs'. ~3ergstrom replied t'nat tti~y h~va done so briefl~ ~n the hall~<<ray. iirs. !~lolf pointed out ~that t'ne Iona lane honies all have 1arg~ picture ~vi ndo~a , i n the i>ar!< of Y,hei r hoines and ~t;u~se ~fioul d b~ 1 oo:i ng out zt t:he proposed apartmen~t bui 1 di nc~. I°irs. '~lol f fel t tha9: t'ni s~~~ro~il cl detract ~ror~ che value of her propert,y. "9r. 9ternal of 61 Tona. Lane statec.! tha~t he did not evant to b~ pus'ned into l~uying ~the '~;!inter property in ord~r to pres~rv~ tPie value of his hon~e. St~rnal stated thaY, ~;'ne pro~erty edas oF no value to him. E~ir. ~ ahey reportecl ~that i1r. i_ee incliclted that ~f the buffer :~terc ~increaseu to 125 feet, he ~rrould go alonc~ ~ri~th the proposal as 1'L5 feet ~,~rould ensur°c tha1: ttu~ tre~ 1~i ne lhioul d rem~~i n as i s. Fahey as!<ed hovr ~Che other Tona Lane proi~ert:y ot~ners fel t about tl~i s. 'r;ergstrom stated that speaking for himself if tne b~.after s-~ere ~increased to 1.7.Ei feet and the r,~axim~c~ he~f ryht o~f th~ aplrtrnent btiri 1 di nci reduc~cl ~to ts~ro s1:or~iES, 'ne ;~ni~ltl not op{~~se it. lio~.~ever, he ti~~oulc! s~t~ll raciier purchase the ~~ropewty tiian go to this. f?ergstrom falt thah ~thc cos~t of buyinc~ ~the propcr~Cy ~~roulci be 1ess of ~ loss. "9r. ~~nne~y of Iona I~ane si:~ted th~t he, ~too, s~tould rather buy the pron~rty and. f21 t he v~oul ci net ;~i s r,ionny bac!< ~~ihen he sol c; the prop2rty. P~ir. ~im Rutzic!< reoor~l~ed that !a!ally Johnson nas joinec' in ivi~t'n his #~irm in the develoo~~ient of this proper~~y. "%~r. P,utzic'~ sta~:~c~ t'nat his f~irm has t.riec to acr,omr2odate ~tt~E= Counc.il anct tiie neighbors ~in pursuing the purchase of th~~ S9in~;er property. Rutzic.'~; ~Felt t'ria~t a b~n`~~r zone i~ras a rnos~t desirabl2 fea~tur^. Rutzic,< stated tl~at Y~e is r.on~F~ased vaith the comments of t'ne neigi~~bors. Rutzic'~ fel t that i f the 4!i nt2r property ~~ere devel oneci >>~ii th c~uacls or i;o~~rnhouse>, or s~ing1e fa~~ily, the bu~P~Fer zon~ ~~rould h~ distiarbed. t?i.itiick felY: tha'c no tleveloper Urould be abl~ ~o retain thr na~ture anc cPiara.cter of t~ie property raP~en p~it~ti nq i n a road. Rut-r.ic.k aga~i n stateci. that he ~Fel ~t tha~ ~he buffer zone ~~aoul d;~e tf~e ciosi: desi rabl e. ~is. ~lardin~i as!<ed if it ~ver~ possibl~ ~to r~align t'ne pro,jecr c~iven r^c~nt Counci l acti on ~ni th reqartl to b~nrls. Rutzi ci< s l:atec! that th~ bonds ar? not based on a specific configuration, hut a genera1 projec.t lev~l. Ho~~ever, ftutzic'r, did not '~cnosv ,~iha.t pos~tion they ~aoi_ild be in i;o no back and chanq~ C'ne projecc as the laonds must b~ a~.rard~<l bsfore thc end of 1:~ie ye~r. Pd<ie -5° E~1I1~1UTES City Council pec. 11, 19c7 R~.itz'ick i^r. (~argstrom did not feel tf~at Iona Lane has changed i'ts at't~tude frorn ?ro~osal that ~Jhich ~r~as oriuina1ly exprrssed. Fit the Plovember 6 wor!<shop Iona (rpnt,) t_ane vaas just hactling the size of t.ha ~urfer, hu~ had not changed its position. P~ir. Jim Rutzic!< suggestPd t's~ai: tney roay be ab1e to ~nove the apartment bu4ldina 30 to 3;? fee~t fur~th2r north. Rutzick reported 1:h<Zt tliey Yi~1v^ not c(onP a co!npletF to4~o of 'tYie area, ilut th~y ~~o~.ild ~tr~~ to keep the hci ght of thn bu~ 1 d~i ng at a mi ni rri.ar.i. i~1r. Fal~ny as~;ed f4r. !~!i nter i f he ~v~r~ ~i n favor o~f the rezoni ng and subdi v~i si on of 'ni s property. ~!i nter repl i ed that 'ne sdas and he vioul d li!<e ~to nroceec! v~it.h h~1r. ~utzirk. (~~rs. Scalze reported that according to a bond, book the C~ity receivect 1ast aaee!<, th2 City h~s 1,3~5 si~ngle fai~.rily hom~~s and 1,5£35 multi-family units. Tha~t rat4o is aoout 54~'o r;~ulti-fainily i.mits. The "lar7~st taxpayer in the City is P~lontreal Courts and t~ie second 1arqest taxpay~r is Ted Gl asrud ancl P,ssoci ates. Scal ze stated tfia t th i s i s a~Siere she has br_en corsi~ng from sinc.e the start o~P t'n9s pro~osal. Developing a~~rtmcnts in ~i~ttle Canad~ is not the sa+~,e as ifi ~they v~ere yoing to be developed in another City. PJardini ooirited ou~F.~tha~t according to this boo'< the~re are only 740 rental units in the Ci~ty and other mul~ti-fa~rily un~its are o~~aned. ?•",r. Johnson of [~ud<er f,oi?~panies a~i>eared bafore th~ Coi~ncil. Johnson r2por~ted f.hat his company is cieveloping o'ther nuilti-family units in ~he St. Paul /~1i nneapol i s!retro area. Johnson fel t~;tiat ari th th~ amount of rent ~hat ~~!oi.~lc be charryed for these i.inits, th~re ~~doulci !~e v^ry fe~~r fa^ii 1 i ~~ ren~,i nc7 and fery i'ew chi 1 dren i n th:~ uni ts. Johnson al su reoorted ~:hat his company's other projects are very x~ell mainta~inecl anct c`~i d not feel that tr~sh t~ioul d be a ~~robl em. Johnson stat^d that 'nc~ ~rias not opposed t:o a reconfi~uration of the nro,ject, bu~t stressetl tha~t th~ clensii;y was im~~or~t~rrt. Jot~nson also suggested 'c'nat burming could be done on tne site. Johnson also reoorted that curreritl~/ the sales of ta:~nhouses and condos are s7ow. Johnson stated tnat the long-terr~ goal !voi.ild be to condo the units. ~ahe~~ asked if t'nere rfas a aaay ~for the c{FVeloper to gi,iarantee t'ne City ~Lhat ~th~ units would go to con<los after a fe~~ years. Johnson sta'Ced that tie cfi d not kno~~i no+.a i:o guarant:ee ttii s otlier ti~ian bui 1 di nn the uni ts 4•~tith the necessary sn.,uare foota~~e ~to do this. Johnson statec! that the;~ could not. ciefinitely forecast that th~y svould com~ert the uni~ts in 12 ye~rs. Scalze uoinL2d out tnit t'ne City is nart of a sci~ool district that li!<es to close schools. Scalz~ furt;her E~ointe<~ out that aparte~ent d~;iellers Page -fi- '1IPIL'TrS Ci~y Council D2c.. 11 , 19%','.i Ru~tzick do nn't qet out and~ vote nor clo mu1ti-farrril,y ci~,raellers like tn~ sinnle Pronosal far;ii ly homeo~~dner c!oas. !Cont.) ;Sr.Johnson point~d out that t'ne prop:~rty is currently zoned B-2 and also r2por~t~d 'tha~: t'ne apa.r'trnent b~iiltfinos s~aill pay about ~1~i0,000 in f,ax^s ear.h year. P~irs. Scalze as!<eri tri~ ;~lans for senior c~i~tizen apartments. P,7r. Johnson r~plietd that t'n~y ar~ planning for straight market rate r~nts. Scalze reporteca that 'ch2 Ci ty i s cmm~ri se~l o F 7% s~ni or ci ti zens and asl:ed i f ~1 bi.i~ilc!ing coia1d be designated for seriiors. Scalze reported tha.t Roseville i s biai 1 cli ng seni or anar~r~ents an~i the~ have a 9~~ senior ci ti zen popul ati on. Johnson stai,ed that if ~~her~ ~,vere thre~ sn~aller buildings on i:ne s~ite, ~it r,~i~;tit be benef~i^ial to des~gnas.e nne of th~ buildinns ~fnr seniors. ~lohnson s~tated that ~tk~ey wo~.alcl l~i!<c nothing betier than to rent 1:o seniors. rahey reported 1:hat the City ?lanner is zoing a market analysis on this !~~ar!<et. Johnson statec.! that; if th^ riarlet can be justifie<i, it is one af the best. ,~irs. i.ee req~.iested that the Co~.mc.il consider th~ build~ing closast to Sona Lane as a tvrn-,tory ~JU1 ~ el1 t1n ancl i r~crease ~h~ buffer zone to 1%5 feet. ?~~ardini point~tl ~~.it th2~ th^ code allou•~s a 30 foot hous^ and~ this building i s not !'ourh hi c;ner. Johnson s~.~qgested ~hat rather than decrease ttie height of 1;hr. o~ail~ings, they ~~roi..il 0 1 i ke to put up a fence. The devclopers rnq~.iest2~i a short r~cess so tha.t they could discuss v~Pia~t. options i~~~ic~ht be ava9lablc. The aieeting rer.essed at. &:3F,, p,~q, The i~ie~tinq ~nas reconvened at E;:50 I~ . I>; . '~r. Fahey report~~~ ~that ~the deve1opcrs 'navs advised h~irr~ tYia~t ~th2y ~r^ ~xi 11 i ng ~to i ncrease the bi~iffe•r rone ~•ai t'n some coop2rai:i on on ttie part of tne Council in the PUD to combinina nar!:inn of th~ com~nercial anc! resiclential areas. The buff~r v~ould be increasecl to 135 fee~: vri~th 110 feet untouc'r7e~; ancl 25 feet of ~aroomFd areia <.irounrJ tha oui 1 di ng. t'a~F~y s~t<atec! tnat on~ o~f ~t'n~ homeo~aners on Tona inqi.iir?d aboui: r2duc~nr~ tne builclinq to ttivo stori2s. (1r.Johnson statFd that th~y coulcf lool< at this, b~rt ii: vroiald be rnore cles~irab1e fro~, an economic s'candnoint to get Y.~~~o uriiform ~~uil~!ings. P~ir. Jirn 6tu~tz~iC!< sta~tect ~l:'nat in licu of tiie addit~ional b~~PTer t:he site '~ecomes nior2 difficult to a~co~rmociate tPie project and they ~~vould prePer t.o sta.b ~;ii t;~ 't~,ao three-story bui 1 di nqs. Page -7- P~iSPdUTI:S City Council Dec. 11, 19U5 Rutzic!< P4r. Stcrnal sta~ed tl~a'r. ~:h~~ three-sf.ory apartm~nf; builtling ~vould be Pronosal vi sit~l e from hi s 1 i vi n~ r~oi~~ ~vi ndo~r. Sterrial st~ted that Avti~n ~:h~ (Cont.) ~.l~velopr,~ent tidas proposrd for tPie ~~~rdinal properfiy, the apari:m~nt: building sdas an adclitional 7C) to f30 feet a~aa,y from the Iona Lane properties. 1=aNie~/ <~s!:ed i~f a coir;n~rc~ial l~~~ilding could be p~.it ~in thr bac!<. t3lesener poi n~ted out that C'ni s~i s vahy apartmerrts are bei ng F~~roposed becaus2 i t cions not t~E~a!<e sense to put a cor~merci ral 5ui 1 di ng b<~c'r, by ~the 1 ake. ~~'lr. Sterna'I ooi nted out that the 4~ro;~~rt;~ i s 11 ready 1 andl ock~d and ~ucstioned v~hat basis the Counc~il had for rezoning ~t.he uro,~erY.y. I"ai~ey rep1ied t'nat the (:ouncil ti~~as concerried ahout tYie bac!< of ~thU 1~!~ n'ter ,~roperty becon!i na 1 andl ockec! and poi ntecf o~.at the probl e!ns arich the development of t.iie ~teneroden property on the south of Iona Lane. ~ahe~~ stated tnat t'rie ':1~inter prooer~ty s,~ill not develop as R-1 v~i~;tiout access and it ~~quld no~; be economical1/ feasibl~ to i,ear d~4~~n one o~P th~ t~;~inter homes in order to nut a road ~in for a singl~ ro4.~ o~f single~ ~Pariily homes. Fahey sta'teci tPiat nertians sorne of the Cardinal prop~arty s4~ould be rezone<1~to .~rovitl^. ~For a double row or s~ngle farnily homes. h~1•r. ~~1e,ener ~inTorrne~S th~ ai.idience that tha Council cinriot bury ~ts head and rot consider the efiect on the t~Sinter oroper~~y. The Council ='i~s to 100!< at a.11 th2 property and try to get a practical use {'or the area.. So~~neon~ ~frori t4ie auc±ienc:.~ rzs!<ec! the r~a.x~irnu~n h~igf'it for the apartment bui 1 di ngs. ~~-1r. Gri ttman repl i ed that thn ra~axi mum Pie~i ght al l o~riahl ~ undcr thF orc'inance ~;~a, 36 fee~t and i1r. ;tut~~ick is or~oosinr, 30 to .',2 feeC. i~4r. Rutzick ~aoin~tEd out that there are oa!< trees that are I~i~'ner than that in thc area. h~1r. >terna1 po'in~ts~d ou~t that some qf thnse trees 4~av~ been cu~t doa~m. P1s. ~lardini introduce~! the folloaring resol~.ition and moved i~s aclontion: RESfl~liTIO?a ;~IO. ~5-12-572 - CLaSINE;• TN~ PU~3LIr FIrARI!`!G OPI 7f11: RE?~IdIi,ira OF TH(: II,r62i3 ~PlD ERI~!I~l !:~I~17'~R PidOPFRTY 7he fo~regoinq resolution ~,vas du1y seconcin,.d by `~ir. Collova. ,~/C'S (J~ ~~dY'C~lYll~ CO~~OVd~ .~iCci~Z:?, f'd~l@)/, 3~°SP11fP. i,fayes (Q). Resolut9on declared adopted. Th~s resolution appears in Resolution !3ook Plo. 12, f>age G26. Page -n- r1IIJUT~'S City Council Dec. 1?, 1~85 Ru~zicl< "l~r. 31:~sen~r stated ~that 'if Iona !_an2 residents s~~ant to buy ~the property Pro,~osal that is fine. I~los~fever, ±3lesener ~felt tiiat any exp~~~nse in c+evelo~ring (Coni:.) th~ pron^rty svoialc t~avr:. ~o i>e borne by the Ionri Lane ~~roper~ty o±~.ners. 7he.9 i~~oul ci end ~[S> ~-ii th a roac~ compl eial,y on ~the proE~erty anc ti~~oul d have to uay for ~i t themsel ves. Thi s r~~~~n , 1:hey d~roi~il d have to buy the ~Fron~t portion oi the 'r!inter pr~p~rt;~ to put t.he road in. r3lesenar estimatecl that if tY~e Iona L~ne people tried to cevelop the proper~ty they ±~oulc~ su~f~frr a loss o~F bet~,~~en ~5,Q00 and. ~10,000 ~er 1 ot. 3'I esener ~li d~ not, f2el tPiat thi s tiaas a feasi h12 eiay to clevel op t;',~ie prop<~rty. 31n,ener stated that iP th~y s~tant to purch~se the proherty to preserve the valu~ of ttie~ir homes, tha~: is fin~, b~.~t it is a little 1at:c in the garne for ~th~i s ano~ ntec! out ~l~ia~t thcy ha~ie macl2 i:nei r aqr~~rnerrts w~i ti~ the '~li nters and tfi~?.t i.he projec~ is ~fund~d and the bon<'. ready te go. °?r. 612senf~r r~~or~C~cl tha.i: ne 1iv~^d on Demont for a n~unber of ys~ars ancl his hous^ t~#as across ti~n str~ei fro::i apartr~~er~ts. f?l~sener P21t that he ~~ot r~i s val ~ae ou~t o r hi s house athen lie sol d i~t al thoi.ig'n i t!riiy have t~!<en hir~ a 1 i ttl e 1 ongEr t~ sel l the house, i~ut ~fiat coul d t~u duA to not having the riyh~t realtor in t'ne h^r,inning. ~9r. 31estiner pointec~ out tnat P-1i°s. Ti,7r'nons agreed that the Iona Lan~ property ~<~~ould be ~'eva1ued, bu~; L'l~sener disaqr~ed. '~~1~sener stated ~tiiat he t'ric~ught ~Nie f2~.~tzick proposal laas a goocl one. ~9r. Sternal askec! if a fenc^ ~~ras inr.lucled in 'the proposal as he v~as concErned about ~Cl~n bi.iffer area beco~:~ing a playground. P~1r, f31 esener c(i cl not feel tha't 'th~ c,'ni 1 eir~ri ~r~ou1 ~~. come out of 'th~ apart~nents ~to F>1 a_y i n tn'i s~area~~. i~lr. Collova. s~tated t'nat h~ ~;ras in ~Favor of ~:Vi~ F~~ropos~l 5as~d on the t<~ct that ~tne '.di nter propertiy i s'I andl oc'<ed antl ~that s~.ir. Ru~tzi c!< ~i s nurr,{~asi ng 19n f~et of tne !~!i n~ter property and t~i 11 only be uti 1 i zi ng G~ ff~~t Co~.inci 1<!i scusseci the i ncl i.isi oii of a fence ~i n the pronos~l . T~t ?~~~~.s dacided that this ~,~ould he a requ~ir~iuen~t in the f~iR:ure ~if ~the Council cle~mE^d n~c~s>ar,y. Location of the fi~nc€~ 4dou1c" a.lso be a dec~ision ~nade by 1:he Council. i~1r. Kl os<i n suqc~ested t4iat t4iere n,ay t» c(rai nagr~ nrobl ems ~;ii ~t`~ only 25 feet of groo~ried arc~z arourici t~e builc'inc~. h'Ir. ~ah^y s~.~crgeste<i that c(rai nane 4~ri 11 be sub,iect to ~the r~r,ornr~iendati ons oi th~ ~ngi ne~r. Pnap -~_ 4'ii1dUTES ~ity Coi.incil Dr,c. 1?, 19`,5 ~llti7lC~< Prqposal (Corit. ) ~"~!i°. Col l nva i ntrodi.icec the rol l nwi n"nVti!G TIIL ~XPr,PIn,_D ~;UTZI!;K< PUD ~P!Tr1 1''.il '.,~I~~ITcR PP~!'FI'TY ,~1PI~ T;ii= DT.+lJST.Or~I OF T~IL !,ITiITG'2 P;;O~kiitTlF..r FQR RUTZIC: ~Y%~P,~ISIQ~I SU!?JE~T TO T~~; P"f!VISION OF A 13~i ~QOT ~U~'rq 7~i!r Tr) y~ r~p:ip!>T<<.f7 (.lf~ ~5 j.F~T p1' ~~!?00~ ''D ^,R[A h"(pl^.Ill THfi 3UILDIPiG Ai;~D 'l l~ ~'F.c.'t OF U~!'f~UCFI!=.D ~UPF!:`: }\I.I~ SURJEf,T T~l 71f~ Sr~ i~. CONr)TTIOr,!S 11S OUTLI~!~~ I~! RFSOI_UTIO~.I i!0. %i5-11-5:;3 k!IIISH T,u,CI_UnrS TNf_ ~?f'OUIR~i"IE~!T 01- .~ I~:Ft•!C~ If~ DE~ ~~'FD ?~i~r' SSAR`f ~3Y Tii~: C,QU;dCI~ t\T ~~ LOC~\'(IO"1 TO 3F.. p~T~~?F!Iil~~) 'Y 7IIF COUP!CII. oucharrre i'.etal 3ui 1 rfi ria ~l(~ C~ 1'l:'I O il Aaenda I~tei~~ P;o. 5 The foregoin~; resolul:ion ~!as dul~r secorideck t~y f~~ir. Fahey. ~~VOS l4-} ~O~~OVc1~ FQt{lP.~(~ ZV~81^C~'Ifll~ `3~(-',SPY1F.?1'. i:lilyf~ i ( ~~ CCd~ Z.°. I?~solu~tion decl~lred a~!opt,r,~c!, 7his resolution appears in i?esoluti~n f3ool< ido. 17_, p~.ige h~7. S^r. Pahe.y poi nted out ~~ha't a sper,i al r,~ee~ti ng v;'i 11 have to be nel d beforn th~ enci pf the year to act on ~he bonris ~For ~the I~ui:zic!: pro;~os~il . The City Cl^rk ~,~'il~l set up ~t"~~ ra~*eting and inf~arm ~h~ ~ounc~il. Tonif)~icharme anpe~2red before the Cot~incil requesting approval ofi the acfdi ~i;i on to one of tii s exi sti nc~ m~tal bu~i 1 tli ngs i n the I-P Di st:ri ct. "~r. Dur.harme reo~~rted thit t'~e business has occupie~ its present si~e ~for the past (i5 years. The r„ain w<zre'noGise is 20,~00 square fee~t anc+, Ducharr~e ti~~oul d 1 i!te to put u,~ a 3,(i00 square foot ac?~ii ti on. The addi ti on ti•ioul d nieet al l setf>acl< re~qui rerients. P~"r. ~aney i~o9nt~d ~t~t 'that r~etal is no't a oermissible r;iater~ial in tne T-P district, or only 2`i`% of f.h~ exterior of a bui1r!inq ean be rn^tal. i=aficy felt tYiat the Dt.ic'nar~n~> buil!!incs s~i~re a non-con~Porminr~ use ut~d^r ~:he ne~vi ordinai~ce. ~a'n<ey felt that the ordinance tlie' not ad<ir2ss ex'is~:ing ~n2ta1 builr,finas in the I-? clistrict and f~lt t'na~. i f s~m~one s~ri th a;ne'tal bui 1 di nc; sdan~tec! to add on, t~~~y shoul d be abl~ io clo 'i~t ~~~i~C1~ n~ri:a.l si<!inq. ~ai~ey fel~t Y.hat i;he Council should a~lont ~the recorrrienctatinn o~f th~> ?uild~inq Insn~ctor to allo~•~ 2xistinq e~etal '~uildinos to ~tdd on, i~ut ~the addition should not exceed 2`i% of tht~~ sqi-iare footaqe of t~u~~ existinq bu~ildinn. ~?s. ~ardini aske<f if ~this vaou1d be ~;he 1ast ad<tition pianne<! zt the sit;^. I1r. Duc~harine replied that he did r~o't t~in'•< so. Durharme po~nt2~!. Pa~;2 -10- ',iI~liiTFS ~1ty ~OUl1C1~ ~r.c. 12, lc'~5 Ducharne Addi~!ion (~ont.) Roci:,y ~~iai te r~Udt"C~ I?dtl ~~f7°l1('.d ~~Cf!! ~~0. ~ out tha.t !'ie has ~three !~i.~~i 1 di n~;s. Fahey oo~i nted o«'c that i f th~ Co!.inc~i 1~~dopted t~e s3~.ai 1 cSi na. Inspector' s 1^CaC01?ll{if?11C~i1"i.l Otl ~~~lE?gf' 71,11 ~ C~'I IlCJS COU7 (~ OY1~ ~/ IJn pXpclilC~s_'(~ h~J l~i%. r!ardi ni aske~S a~o~rt tii~ s~ t~~at;i on y~aher^ after a fes~a ynars soriaone uro~ild ;~iant to ac~c': ano~ther 2`i%. Pahey statec thi~C upon t~.~~~ efifectiv~ date of t4i^ or~finance, the s~iz:~ t>f th^ struc~ture co~.alc.? on1y be ~«led on to '>yy ?5%. !31 es~n~r st:at2d 1;ha~t: ~i P the ^i ~P,y al l ows tYii s i n the Ci ty' S resi ri~nti a~l anr! cor:iri2rc~a1 distr~cts, t~it~ I-P ~(istrict shoulcl als~~ be ai>le 9;0 ha~~e t~iis nrovision. ;Ir. (=ahny sug~r~,tetl t'riat ~hz~ Souncil t<t';^ i!p this rer;i~est lai.er in ti~e ~;~eet~inc; afi;sr it Pias ac~ter! on the residcnt~ial and co~!~i~r~rcial distrir,ts. '~~ir. Rod:y l~lait;e a.pueared befor~ the Co~mcil and requesf,ed a c~uard rail on Co~inty 4?oad C and Lak.shore P,venue in order to protec~ his ma~il~~ox. '~;;a~ite reported that s'ince the City extendad the c~uardrail iri the area i~e has bs~4~n 1 oosi nn Pii s raai 1 hox. ;1r. 3lesaner report2d 'cha~t the Public '~~!or:~s Super4nt~~ndFn~t; estiniates the cost or instal1ation at ~24~1~ fbr t!'ie firs~ tirn~ around. Pualic ,~?or';S c~FS nnt f^~*1 the ~uarclrai1 ~s n~cessary frosn a. sa~Pet,y standpoint. Th2 on~y reason to put ur~ the cuardra.il is to ~ro~;ec9: a~~ailhox. P"r. 31 esen~r stat~d t~at i f~2oy !iad~au askec! that t'rie ;uard.rai 1 be ext~~n<ied to pro~ec~ V~is }iouse, then Pie a~~oulri consider i:he reques~t. Hoa~ever, !?1 escn~r cii d'noi: fael the Ci ty shoi-~1 d spend ~i ts r,ioney ~;o i~rotert a r~iailbox. Mr. t~raiY.e pointec~ Gx.ac that ~'ne quardra~il covers the City se~~ver easeraen~. i;fa,i ~te al so cu2sti onecl ~the ,vay ~trie gi,i<irdrai 1 tha9: i s ex~ st:~i n~~ u~as put un anct~Felt that there ~vas no nec~ssity for t'rie last section that ~ias insta1led, ~"aPie~~ ac,re~<i ~that ~t~e Ci t~/ sho~il <( not spe~ne i cs r~oriey to pro~ect 1 mail~b~x. Y.~aitE re4~~rt~d t~iat the City F~iat a culvert ~~~ and cove~r~d up the ditcn and no~.=t the cars c.annot s'top ~.Mi'thout hittinq his n~ailbox. !1ai'te al so reported ~Ciia. t t'~e Postal Ser~~i ce svi 11 not 1 et lii~~i nio+ie `~i s rnai 1 box ~vithout cha.nyino h~is addr2ss. blai~t~ a.s!<e~ t:hati thie last section be reino~ie~l so ~hat cars are nnt funnFl~~el do~1m to ~iis inailbox. [~~Y'. !"'d'!1C?~/ SUCIC~@S't(-',(1 "~~(Id'C ~;~d11;£ ~I.i~ ~llS 1?ld'17hOX ~101llYlfl 9;r1P. ~dS1; S@Ct;'IOiI of ai,iarcira~i'I. ~;I~ite re!~'lied that tfiei~i ~the ~f,~ilman viill no~C ~ke1iver Pa~t^ -11- r,j',IIJTrc City Council I,l n C. ~~ ~ ~~i i2 ) Sdaite his mai1. blait2 ro;nmented that the City has caused h~s prob1e;o by 6u~rdra~i1 j~utting up ~'ne las~t s~action of gua-rdr~i1. (Cont.) "ahey suncleste~i t'nat P~!r. €>1 esener di scuss ;>>i th P~ir. Gl anz~r ~the uossi hi 1 i t,y o~F removinq this section of rai1. ~lesener a1so renorted tna't h2 s~ri11 find out. the histor,y oP t'ne quardrail and r^port b~~c!~ to ~tli~ Co+.incil. Scal zn fe1 t tYiaY, the Ci ty ~~aoul ci !~~ s~tti nn a~prec~dent 4y i nstal l i ng ~ a ~u~rdrail to proT,ect a r!ia~ilbor,. F~~h~y c'.id not ~feel that the ~"ity has a responsibil~ity for negliyent drivers anr! he tivas r~ot in favor of snPn~iinq an,y r~ore money on this. ~3lesenercornrn,~nte~ting. I<lidz~~~js P~r. Klidzejs of Tb~~in La!<e Road appenred before i:hn Counc~~l ren,uest'inq ~ Propercy ~F~p~^o;~al of ±~~e ~livision of Piis proper~ty i~~to Tracts ~1, 6, and C, i)ivision 'l.liclzejs re~orteci tnat tre ~ias a house on irict ~, his son has a ho~.is^ on Trac~t ~ an," hi s dai.inh~ter ~:voul ~( 1 i'~~ to !~>u~i 1 d a house on Tract A. Aqenda It^n~i P~!o. % ~~ir Fahey no'in~ted oi.i~ tha~t the Pl~nn'in~ Co~~i°iission tlble<i ac.~ti~n on ~:hi5 rnatter. liow:ver, the !~~a~i:er ~~aas l~eFore the Plann~inn Coi~m~ission on f~~/ ~i at ~.J{~i'ic'n tim~ the Planninn Coi~ni~ission recommended approval, subjec,~t to a road easernEnt of th~ prop::ar ~;~ici~th. This carried ~ t:o 1. !:lidzeis r~p~rt:~d that 1'ie spo!:e to (1rs. ~~Pitchell's son, ovaners of tn~ a~)join'inr prop2rty, and r~as infiorn~eci ~that ~t,ieY do not wisYi ~to develop the~ir 4.36 acres, antl will sell the pro~;~er~ty to ~a developer sometir,~e i n~the futt.~rc. Kl i dzej s^s ~imatec( ~Cnat 12 1 ots co~i1 d be devel o7ec! fro~~ the ir~tch~ll }~roperty a.ncl t~i~t acc:~ss to this nrop~~rty ~riould be froi~i ti'~e ro<~d eas.r-,inen~t runn'ing alongs'ide n~is uroper~ty. F~ir. F~hey di d not ~`eel i;~~~at the Ci ty coi,il d aps~rove the request as th~ lo~ts mould nof, Viave frc~ntan,e on an improvec!. street. The ~ity Clerk reported t>ia~r ~he City iias 15.Ei fPe~k o~f ^asen~ent for se;~~er on bo~Pi "~fie p1itchell proper~ty anc~ ti~e :1idz~js properiy. ~~r. Klidzejs disaqr^ed anri reported tnat tnerc. is 'LO feet of cas^men~: on the ~~iitche1l property. P~irs. Scalze pnirited out that sahe~~ tiie ~~?itc}i21'I pro}~eri:y c'evelo;~s, they i7ay ~evant ar.cess frorn an~~1:'~ier area. Fahey r~por1;etl ~t'nat C'ity ;~o1ir.y h~1s been ~to recii~ire `~~ feet o'F road eas~~r~c~nt cl~dica9:ed to the pi.iblic to approve a nrop2rty divisir~n. I'~+i°y c!id no~i: fee1 that tPie ~Cl~icixejs proper~y could be dividec until ~ti~e ~-litchell property devF~loos. Kliclzejs report~d tha~: hF ~ias en easerient to get to Piis house anci that in the future it 4voulcl ~e public. o<1g~` -1'- '1tilU7!' i ~.l t,~/ i.OU~iC'i ~ DeC. 12, 1955 ~~j~l~,~~~s ~~d}l^`/ Y'(?h01"f:?f~ 1;f1<xl. '(',{lc^. rl Cy }l15 CIC'.Y17^C~. >ll'il~dY" 1"£'.f~U°StS. i~tlylE'f S'tdl`.C~'C~ Pron~~r'ty that i:he Cit~ r.annc~tapprovea lot; unl~ss 'it fias frontage on a public ~1 V'1 SlOYI S1:Y'E"~. (Cont.l ~ahey as',~ed if the !;ity Pias ever reqi~ired a road easersi~n~t, but that th~ easem2nt. noc he c~eveloned. ~aheq cited the cas~ of R:°. S;\uto. Clesener poin~e<! out ~t'na~t tt~e Ci~ty ~~~iil need r~;ore easement from the `".i Cc}~e~11 proper~ty. ~~ir. Kl i<ize j s asked the tyne of roaC t}i~ C'i~h,y ~,~toul ~s. rt~c~i.ii r~. Fe}~e.Y reported ~that ~ 5o foot easeri.<~nt vrould be r~cuirAd svith a'0 fbot ' ly 1'S f22t oav~aG ar^a. I<1'idze,js n<rinted out ~tha~ Ts~iin i_a':~ `toad is on "!l C°. "lesen^r re:~ort~r! that, 't'ne ~i1;y need ?.5 f~e~ of road easernr~n~; frorn ~,-lr . I:liclzeis in order to ~?ive Tracts '~ anr} C c~ccess. !3lesener did not th'ink t'nat ~:fiF Ci1;y sho~ald reGuir~~~ pavin~ at ~Chis ~tiine. :<lidzejs inciicated tYiat h~ ~~~as w~illinq to ciive t'n~is easement a1ong Trar~ts A and G, '~ut: pointed ou~t tnat he ~~lici not o~an Tract C. The Planner repowted ttiat tne code allov~s the dedication of half a stren~: ii pract:ic~l to requir^ the d~dir.ation of the otiier hzlf ±rl~~n i;he adjoin~ng prop~rty dc~v~1ops. ~"r. Grittman then r~ported f.hat t:h2 '<1 i dzej s proaerty wot.i1 d have frontag° o.r, ~ publ ~i r. s~ree^:, al tPioi.igh it ~,~oulc~ r7ot fae ~Pully dedir,ateG'. Gri~trsan suc!,caested t'.iiat thht> Counc~l deteri;ii ne ~;he t'ii~iefram~~ for the devel op~ient of the 'r'ii tchel l pros>2rty. The Fngineer fel~t that the 2~ foot'. ro3<? de~ica'tion avo~.il<I be suf~Fic'ient. T:~e F.ngin~~r c!iel not feel tha~t 't?~c Ci~tv should ~xl~ect IC1~idze,is to ni ve ~tn~ o~t~er 25 feet of road Y.hat a~~oul d be requi red frora th~ `~'i t.chel l r~roperty. Scal ze poi n~ted ou1; '~'nat ~the nropEr'ty ovmers ~ n the ~~lood.lyn Avenue area ~,~oul d al ,0 1~i'~e io ad~l on to the~i r hi.ii 1 di nc;s <and. the Counci 1 sai d, tr~at thc~~ canno~t d.o i:his utit:hou± cetl'icat~nq and i:nnrov'ing a roti~i throuc~n t:he area. ~laruini oointed out t'nai: this is a coa,ri?~rci<~1 area. ~aney poi ritecl ou~t t'ia.~t t'ne Ci ty has ~t`ie notenti ~1 ~or the c!ev~l opment o~ the acfjoininy property in ~this cas~. Sca1zE^ fe1t that Tracts °~ <and C shoi.~lc1 noti b~ allo~rred to expand in any ~fii~1y t~inti l tY~e roac! 'i s im~~rovecf. >ca1 ze til so fel i; that n~i ther of tht~ ~rouert.y orrners o F 7rar,~.s B or C should protest tYie i~nprovernenL of the road rrhen Zhe t;irae coroes. The C'it.Y Cleri< suqy2sted thaC a de~~eloDer's acrrez~~n^nt be recjuirec! olqn _13- P4I i~!U7E S Ci'ty Counc~il ~~c. 'il, 19~5 I<1 i dzej s ~1r. !31 esen^r i ntro<luced ~he r'ol l owi nc~ resol uti ori and movec i i;s a.r•.opti on: ProperY,y ~)ivisio~i R`~.S~I UTION i~~0. fiG-1~ 57R~ - A?PROVIP~~, THE :~.IOC~JS (Cont.) I'l:OP~"Ty r)IVISION SU'3JE~T Tn, Tu~ ~rUTC,n.TI011 Oi~ .A ~Ill_L 25-F(~OT PU3LZC R011i) 0?~a T`IF SOUTFI SIOeS ~)F T'lACTS Fl p,t10 B P,id`7 Sll!~,)~=~T TO `~X` SIJ7I0~~ OF A DE`J~LOPER'S AG~R~E"1~.1'17 T!iAT TIiE OSdt'.!ERS Oi TRACTS 1a AP1D 13 k'il_L r10T OSJF..CT TO Tf~G Ii'1P?OVF."9!it~1T OF 71~IF ^,O,~n I1! 7FIf- FUTURE ThP forF~goinci resolution rias duly secon~':ed '.~v '^~r. Collova. Ayes (5) =..~1csener, "ollova, Scalze, '~~rc!ini, ~~ahey. tl~yes (0`. !?esolut~ion declar~d adopted. 7hi s resol uti on appeai°s i n Reso1 i.iti on !~oo!< No. 1 I, '~agc Ei28. i,~F~;11 ;%rs. Scal ze p~i nted out ch~zt the P~ui 1 di ng ~nsnecl:or i s concerned tha~t Ru~1ciings i~t is not possible to naine ever.Y typ~~ of building raacer'ial tiiat coi.+ld he used v~ith re~ard t~~ proposed ~rd9n~~nce Plo. 269. !lgenda Tteri !do. ~l F~les~ner fel~t i~ ~~as no1: possibl~ to wr~i~e an ordinar,ce ~to c.over ~very- thinc. rahey agreed #;nat c~~ ~aord "stea1" should be a~acl~d to Stem 2 of the ordi nance I~ahey s r~teci tVi~~t i i' ~there i s a probl eri wi th Ch~ ordi nanc~, the Counc9l cou1c; look at it at t.haT, tir?e. f~ahey also felt tf~a~t 25% should be add~d to ILem 3. i~fr. Rlesen~r noi nted out th~t the Ci ty has i ssuec! a bui 1 di nc; p~ri~ri t for 1~!orins Ti res i;o allo~,~ this huiltlinn to 2xpand ~.vith s'ir~iilar r:iateri~1s. ThF ex~;~ansion i s ov: r ?5`%. f~ah~y pointed ou~t t'nat this is before the ordinance. t1os!<in as!<e<i hoei ~:4i~s ordinance ti~!i11 effr~~c~ his business. Rles~n~r "1r . r~~pl i ec! that: I:1 osl<i n~~oul d be a~l 1 ov~^r.l to expand ±~i ~ l~ui 1 c'i n~ up ~to 257~~ of tsie ex~isting struc~tur~ and ~,ait'n similar construc~kion. K1 oslly enit'n tne ord.inance. Fahey fe1~t 1;hat th2 Council should, aqree on an intent of the ordi~nancE~, a!~d then le~Y, the 11~t~.i:orn~~/ draft th~~ ordinance. Fafi~y as'~ed i~f tiie i ntent ~;ias to al 1 o~rt a~lcii i:i ons ~>f '5°0 of ~Che exi s~;i n,n, b~.ii 1 cli nry ~r~i th simi 1 ar ~;ateri 11 s. Fahe~/ stated tha ~~t.n2 square footaqe wo~.il d h~ bas~d on the exis~ting bu~ldin<~ an ~the dat~ ~~f i;he adoption of the ordi nance. P1r. Rl esener agree~l. Sr,al z2 sta'ced ~that i i: stioi.~l d b~ a inaximi~m o'P 25% and a one-t'ir~e deal. Page -l~t_ ,'4IMUTtS C,i'ty Cotmci1 ';lec . 11 , 15 ;5 ;~,iP~;~~~ ~ir. I<1 osl>s or ;ne~tal si x a~y ;~Ai~dings six c.onstruction. The Pltanner stated that Ch? int^rior of a i~~.iil~inr (~~~n~.) is f~ine as long as i1; mE~ti~ts Coct~. '~ut a nevi metal ex~er~ior coiald not b^ {nrC up. Council s~angested that I~;er+ 1 ~n the ordinance h:~ a;~iendetl to r~acl °I,lo nole type b~aild~ings, conv~ntionally frarr~ef;, pre-~Pab or hngineered s~teel tiuiltlings viith m2t~i1 exterior (.•ialls or rr~o~P), ovc.r one himdrec~t tvienty (1?0) square feet., s'nall be al1ovr~rd. Coimcil then sugr~~st;ed thaC the „iorci "steel" b^ aclciec~ to IY,er;~ 2. Fahn~/ surg^s~ed 9:tia.t tne ~~ttorney draft the ordi n<~nce al ~~n~r ~:ri ~th ~ simi 1 ar one for the I-P n~is~rict. The Attorney rep~rt2<' ~thai; ne ;vill have th~s reacly for t4~e ser,oncl 'r,~~~'ting in J1n~aary. [)+ic'narm~ r~r. ;~~Iiey asl:2d `1r. ~`~i.ictiar!,i2 if hz~ planned 'tn sprin':1?r his enrire F~dc!~tion building. Du~:h~rm~ reoorted tnat ne did. (;;ont. ) ;~"r. K1 oski n asked i f~ie added on to ~~~i s+;varehous^ i~f i t`~+oi.i1 d have ~to bF~ sprin~<lerecL i~ls. h':ardini rep~l~ied that any build~ing or add~ition over 2,000 >ei.iare fee~t ~~~o~ilcl have to i~e sprin!<lereo. ,1nd i~n the c~se of an add'i t~i on, ttie ~~ifi~>l e bui 1 d~i ng rtou1 d hav~ ~:o be s}~ri nk'i ere<!. ^ios'ted F~ The City i\t.~tornev renorted that he has contacted i~~rs. i~-losted. Th2 Jo'nnson listing on a~er oroper~~y 'oas ex~ired <tnc~ she does not ~;~ant ~to tall: ter°si: i ~'ro~e~rti~s n ~to the Cii;y urrtil sh~ has ta11<ed t~ `iE~r att~rneg aboi.it ~m/ that ~he rcali;~r +riight s~t~ll h~v~ in t4~~ ,~ror~~rty. A~,enda It~m i~~o q ~"1rs. ~~lostec.; also indic~l't~d to Y.he ~ttorney ttiat sYi° is only interest~c! ~ . ty i n s~~~l l~i nn the propert,y t'nat i s 1 o~:v anc~ not i~.'ne home or ~the proper fronting on 11oe1 Crive. 1'he r~t~oriiey did no1; ~thin'< thai: l9?a f,ity e~ier det~rntined exar.~t1y ~.•rhat pronerty i i: needed for tt~e hal 1 fi ~~1 ds. ;irs. Plost~d i s i ntaresY,^d i n t'ne c~xar,t acr^an~. y ff~11: tn~t t'ne linyinQer !na~i have ~to }~~~~et 4~ritSi ~the P~r'~ r- Th2 ~i~tt:orn . . Commission on tPiis and also i:h~ uossibiliCy of access to ~!o°l i)r~ve 5~10L1~ ~ !)n COt1Sl (1°1^2Q. Scalz<~ ~Fel~t th~t the City si~ioi~ld Piave acr.ess +o i~loel Dr~iv~ for Mrs . hot;'~ a i~l ac!<top tr1~ 1 and. 'the possi bi 1 i ty of par!<i nq ~ f i t i s needeci. !~r. riles^ner acire~ci. 31^sener felt inat a~~i'<e ua.th v~as a•r~zl possibilii:~/. ~9r. ~31 esc~ner i ntroc.!uced t'ne Pol l o~~ai na. resol u ~i on and ;~iovetl i is adopti on: Page -15- F?Ti~!UT~ S ~it,y "a!ancil D^r, , 11 , 1 ~?<l~i '~'i~Stf'Ci ~~ ~'o~nson i~rol>ert.i ~~s (Co~nt..1 ~FSOI.UT'I9t~ ~j0. f~'.i-1.`.?-Ei7'i - I)IgIiCTZI?G TN~ n_. ;-~{Glfd~cl? 11'li) !3ILL SF,b!I)ERS i~ ~;•'OR< TOGP711~`> 70 ~1fT~ ~~,.iT~,,l4~ TN`i L~.;! p'?f?c~F'7Y >Jc` pf I~ cn(~~,~ P'!RS ~'~'1ST~~1 `.'OR Tlti U' V`i.~_Ox~EPl7 OF 3,M1LI_t=T~1_!7S Ai,lp TF1!: /\C~ES ~ II:C`i:iS~,?Y 7p il,ntr~ 0':d.1V~ The for~noinc; resoli.ii:'ion ~,ras duly seconded by ~~s. 5lardi~ni. ,~.yes ( 5 i ~31 esener, '~~lard~i ni , ~ol l ova, ~a'riey, Sca~l ze. ~Jayes (0;. ftesol uti on de.^,1 ared adop~ted. Th~s r~solution appears in i?r~solu2:ion i3oo,t f~!o. 12, Pane .i2S. 'ftu~? l\ttorn~y s~;at~d that thn C'it:y c~tnnqt re~r!ove tYie continnency on the ourchase of tn~ Johnson nroperty i~nti'I it knows ~he status~o~P t;he "~iosted r,rop~rt~/. ,~'ahey f~l t tPiat 't'ne C,i ty shoul d~aroceeci t•li t:h ~thc p~arch~se of tn~~ Johnson property ^ven though tYie '"ost^d nroperty is not resolved. Sr.zl ze as,<ed i f ti~c Ci ty coul d exten~I thn opti on on t1i~~ propert,y i n order to loc'~c in t~ie prir.t~. The Attorney stated tP~at ~the on1:'ion svould fre~ze ~the price. Ilo+:~~ever, ~the ~ity P~as no cp~~u!iit~?ient ~`r~n? P'irs. ~'os~t2~i as to ~~~~ ;~ro;~~~rty or urhat i~t woul d cos~t. Pahey ac;ai!~ stai.ed 4.haC he fe1~t the Jotu~son prnperty purchas2 stioulci be fol l o~~ed tif~~rouq~7. i".s. ~!ardini suc~~ges~ted tha~. ~tne C~'ty ~oi~nc~il ta!<e 30 days to tYiin!; abou'~ i t, i~ir. r~~ne/ i?itroduce~d the fnllo~rinq resolution ancl mnved its adoi:~tion: R~'SD!_UTSO'~~I N0. £3'.~,-12-!S7G - DIf:EG7I1dG 7;i'~_ CITY A7T02;lrY 70 ~~s~0.r,~6n IiIT~, T~~E °URC;1,1>~ 0;: T~~;- JO!IiJSO:`d PI:OPE`?7Y UpIL~L'2 TIiE COhI~ITIt)i~1S 111,r) i"TGU:Z(=S 7H;\T i;i~[ SO~1N.r,Ii_ PR':VIOUSL`/ OETr;?i~i~1~_`) A~1D 4lITM Tr!F ft_P~iO'~!FI OF THF'. C014TT~1GF'^ICY P'`~=i1!~DIr!r, THE ('I.l~?CHIISF 0!- TiII- r°IOSTFD ~ROPt,RTY The forc~oi nr, resol i.i ti on s:~as r~u1 y seconcied ~y f9r. Col l ova. /~~~!(?$ i~~ i~<a}lf~?y~ C.O~~OVd~ ~!:i~2~~~ ~`~d}^(ilYl'I. ~,~i!`/f,`S i ~ ~ ~i~:?$?Ylt i^. Resol~rtion declared adopted. This resalution a»pe~rs 'in `ieso1ut~~n ~~oo!. blo. 12, Pa~!e f~.',0. Paae -lti- p;ij~lliTirc (;'I$;i ~0lIt1C17 t7~c. 11, ~q~; P1annrr's Tn^ Planne~^ s~!uraii.:f;ed a propos<11 fnr services for l~fi~ inCreasing his !;on~ract rnon~thly f~~~~ frorn `<650 per o~onth ~to 5500. The Cl~r!c r~oted tri,,t ~:his is the `i rs ~ i r~crease re~~a^s'ted i n four yea.rs. Tt avas f~irther re~port^fi~ tha~: this increase is consistent i~rith r~Piat other gro~.ips i~ave rnquested for 19f36. P~?s. '~lare!i ni i ntr~d~ic~d the ~fol 1 o~ti nc2 resol uti on an~J movecl ~i ts ado~~ti on: itfi"OLUTT(li~.! ~50. t>Ii-1?-577 - ,4PPC?OVIP,IC Ri'~~D !!,;;CFpTT~-~~, Tf~F o~~~l?1"?`S P20pOS!1L P~`2 i~!?~lI!;ES TY18 1`Oi"$EJO'i t1rt 1"eSO~ ll~l pil 4ldS (~t1~,y S°COYIC{L3Ci i)y ?'1Y'S. ~~Cd~ 7_F.. ~,~fiS ~J~ i~ll".j1Y11~ jC8~7.B~ `j~f1SQP1@Y'~ ~,O~~OVl~ t'Fi(IPf. i~~1,yf?5 ~n~. Res~luf.ion declared ad~pted.. This resoliation app2ars in Res~lu~ion Cioo'~ Mo. 12, Page i~l. F~band.ori~ci '"!rs. ?~lardin~i reported t;P~a~t tYi2 City's ordinance cio~s not civc 'che polic~ V~hiclc~s the a~.rthority to re!:,ove 1n abztnc'oned vehic:1e from gublir. s~tre~t.s. Riardini r^porte~S that tt~er^ rras recently si.ic4~ txn insi:anCe and ~the C~t.inty iiad to Acienda be reques~i;ec4 ~o remove ti~e vehicle. Iteet ,.!o. 13 It ~,vas suggest2c` tha't t;hc A'ttorney revie+,~ thc orr~ina.nc2 ~nd dra,T* up so~nethi ng t~~at ~~~i 11 ni v~ ~i;he~ Ci ty th'i s a~rthori ~Y. ~~laim'inci ~3eg~i~nninr, January 1 there ~aill he three ~Cerms o~P oi~i`ice a.va'ilahlel on Coci,nission the P'lann~ing Commission. it tN~s ihe concensus o~f the Council 'to advertise ~\ppointi~~~~nts these nosi~ions. Aq~nda "~~rs. Scalze introcit.icen th~> follo~vinc res~~l~.at~ien anc! ~noved i1:s ac!<opi;~ion: t'tee~ iJo. ln. RESOLU7IQf,! ~0. 55-12-578 - A~)UF.RTISIM~~ TI~f2F~' PpSITICIPJS A11ni1.:4131_F. QfJ TI~1<': PL!~~lNIid[;~ rr)",1:{iISSI011 itl"qIid,IZ1IG J!l?lUARY 1, 19~3'~ 7!IROUGN r)scC~Pi't;FR 9~ ~ ~ Of>,~ 1'he for~qoin~~ r^solution w~s dul,y s~cond^d by i~9s. P~~lardini. Flyns f`.;l Scalz~~, Pi~rdini, Faiie~/> L'ollova, Bles2n~r, ridV@S (:)~. f:;~st~1 i,it~i on decl areci adnpt~d. ~1115 P(?50~11~;1011 8p~1f?c9P5 7il ~:°$O~U~1C771 ~iOp~C i`~0. ~~~ ~ilnl~ j;i'?, Parl; Ther~ is an~ 'term of of~~ir,e available on t~e P1rk Conimissic~n l~~gir~ning ~01(If!I15S1011 ~)dllL!d.l"1/ 7. ~OiIC^YISUS Rlcl$ ~;0 r7~Y:'Y'~lS" ~~115 r)OS1{:1011 P1S 4dt?~~. nC;E?IlC~r1 11~~1d~i ti on Praqe -17- i4IhIliTFS Ci ~t:y Cotinc'i'I Dcc. 11 , 19£35 Stree~: 7yiF foreno'inc? rz~sol~,~tinri ~,~as dtaly s~conr'ey ^~lrs. Scalze. Linhtin~! ~V.^.S ~!)~'~~?.ti";~lfllj iCt~7~'~ ~,0~70~/8~ `i7~s~~~~~>r,~r~,r,~~y. PO~1Cy "Id~~^S (Q~, (f,ont. ) '?esol ut.i on d~~cl ared acioot2d. 7his resol!at~ion a~>pears in Re,olution i;oo!< ?!e. 17, ~ac^ ~34. ~C)ODYI°1^ ~'"iY'S. SCa~7C Y'P.n01"'LCC~ '~~"Id~l: Otl i)0C°Ill}>QV" ,si 9~(l/' F~lrl.5 8'~; d>C~"100~ (30c11"<~ Par!, r~ee~t~inn. T~i~ suk~,ject of i.inus~d sit~s ~Fc~r sale came up anc4 Spooner !?ar'< vras oriw of t~re si tes cfi scussed. 7P~!~ School Poard s~:atec! t'.ha.t ~oenrla it does not ~irant to rush into zn.ytn~inq, an<,1 t~~o~ild probably no~t make Item ido. 1~ 2 decision un9;'i1 r~ext Year. Tne Sch~ol 3oard ~sked P~lrs. Sc~1ze if Lit~:~a Canada Uras sti11 interest~d i n buy'i nq S;~ooner Park . Scal ze i nforrned ti~em tha.t she taoul ri 'riav~ to checl w~itl~ the Co!anc~i1. Scal ze al so renorted that I_1 c~yd id'i el son ti~di 11 be ~uri ~~ ng ti~~ ~i ty a 1~~tt~r sta.t'ing that they ~ail1 be ma!<ing a decisir~n nex~t year antl asl:ing if this ~,!ill co~if'u;~ tPie Cit~/'s p~lanninc. ~~ir. Rlese;~er, .~s, Narciini arir,l fi~r. FaliFy reporf:ed ~;l~at they saere ~n'r.2resf,ed in purchasing t{~i~ pront~rty. ~a'ney Pel t that 'cSie (:i ty ~~ioul d be i ni;erested i n r~ursi.ii nu the purchas~ any time ~that t'~e School (?istrict pi.rtf.V~e proprrty un for ,alc. Faf~ev f~l t t.hat the Ci ty shoul c", ~.~ri te a. 1 e~t~ter i;o ~he Schoo1 Board i n~forn~i n~7 ~then that ttie City is interest:~d in nurchasinq the park. P'irs. Sr,atze pointetl o~,ii; tkiat t;tie City +~!~11 n~e<l a referendur,~ t;o purc9ia.s° th~ ,?ropert,y and pninted out ~that ~;iere +~ril1 be other refcarendi.~!~~s firoin the Schoo1 District on the oallot. Sc~1ze qi.iestioned ~t'nat voters ~t~otilc' approve 1:!u C~ity's r~fier?ndum in add~ition to tho>e froM the School t?istrict:. ~3lesener fcl~t ~that ~the C'itv st~ould either in~ic~~tF a viill~ingness to purcliase ~th~ nrop~erty or as:< fbr a lonc;-~r~rm ,r,om!nitmnnt frorn t?ie Sc4~oo1 Rnard for ~C4~c~ use of thc property. r~~lr. 81esen~~~r introduced th~~ fc~llowing reso1u~,ion anci ~';~oved its adop~~on~ ftES01_UTSOPI N0, 8E;-12-h3:? - IP!>TRUCTl~IG T~iE C.T.TY CLE:2f< TO !~~!`:TTF P, LEI~TER TO TIP,~ SCI100!.. !3~P,RI? Iid~'ORPr1I;dC~ Tk{EF~I Ti~IAT THF CITY OF LITTLI: CAt~l~llt\ tS I^ITEI?EiT<<) I:`~ "rT'1.I~•!I'I~a iPOf?yt~.R PAR': ~ITFI~i4t tiY ~UR~~i:4S!: 0!? LD'`IG-Ti:R~'~ AG;t':r;+i~p~T !!TTiI STIP!JL:hTSO;`! TlIAT -rF~~ CITY ~F LTTTLE CAfdADA. 1~III_L SIIIVE 7fiE ?IGHT !?F FII~ST REI=I;SAL I!= 7H`: Pn~?FRTY CO""~S U? ~~1" S~11 ~ r~~n~ _~q_ ~;r!~!r~:s ~;t:y ~"oi,r,c.;l ~)(,?!`. ~ I ~ I ~)JJ !>~ir`~t Cor!unission (Cont. ; `~~ir. ~ ah~~~y i ntroduced the ~f-ol 1 o4~~i nq r~sol uti oi~ and rioved i i s ado~~ti on: pf:S01_l!TIOi! N0. ~3(5-12-57~ - A.')VF:RTTST.h~!1 N ~'~SITT.O'~I k~,V11TLFlBI.f= 0~I TlIE PARK Ct1t~;~,~I~~IQ°~',I !;E:r:~TDInIIP;G J,'1~!t!ARY I , 1986 Th^ for~~qoing resn1utio~n rras duly s~conr'e<( hy h9r. B1esener. ~~`J8S ~~~ i'dliC}/~ ~i~2S~Y1CY'~ .r,,O~~OV<7~ $Cd~Z~'~ ~l~ll"OIYI'i. rldV^S (O1. Resolutinn declar~d adonted, T'nis resoli.rt~ion app~~lrs in f?nsolu~f:ion F3oo'< ido. 12, ~age G32. Sna;tplar; ~"r. Bl~,en~r report•~d ~:hat t,~r~ Pu'~~l~ic 'vlqrk, L1epnwf;ment ~~voulci li!;~ ~to ourCh~se a snori~loFa for t?~e n^r~ pic.k-u~ t•ruc'~. Thr~c bids hav2 aeen A~enda obta.i ned and Publ ic !~,~or:<s ~~ioul d 1 i!;e to a~~rard tl~ie bi d to I.-? Company. Item i~lo. 1`i I~t has also becn r2~ uested ttia~; the funclinr comf~ from the 19<3o budget. i~~1s. Plard~i ni ~i ~ntro<=.!!ced the fol l owi ng resol uti on an(1'n ~_i r,[1,~1p,~fiY Fr)ft TH!" CITY' S 1~l~ S,~ PICK-UI~ TRUCI<, AI.LOCATTO,`I TO !3[ FRO:"1 Tlii= lt?i6 i3UDl:~fT The forer!ninc; resoliation ~-~as c!uly seconr+,e<; by '"r. '1^sener. ~`YQS ~Jr I~)l}"(~1111~ `)~^S°tlf?Y'~ ~'il(1°1~~ (.07~OVd~ SCl~ZB. \I1vk?S ~~)~. [~es~~1tition dnclared ad~>pt~~d. Thi > reso1 ui:i ~~m appears i r~ Reso1 uti on 500!< Pio. 12, ~aae Fi33. Str~ei; 'r~~lr. Slesener si.ib~;iitted to t~e Council for c.onsideration ~ street li~sitinr t.ight~in<7 policy ~~ri~iich he and the Pt.ii~t~ic ,~!orks Si.iperintend~nf r~coe~n~~nd hr approved. !~olicy "lesFn~r aointed out tha~t ~t~.~ro ~zlrar!raphs have b2en ad~c~ec! to tne pol4cy frt>r,, rrha~l: ,ras prev~iously subnlit~tec. The~t deal ~r~ith Counr,il anproval fjnen~'a of certa~i n tyue:~s of 1 i cihti ng and i nstanc~s an<.I t~~'nen ti~~ Put~l i c t~iorks ~dditiori S~.aperintenden~: is ~ut!~iorized to approve liqhts. ~1 esenr-~r al so poi nt~d OU t t(Idt "tIl'.? Ci ty c!nes not ,ia~ie a st,andar<i ornairiental 1igh~t, P~!eitYier does PISP. ~3lesener suc~gested that ~if th~ Council uranCs a stanciard, it 4vi11 hav~ to s•iork on ~tiiis. f ~s. hdarcli ni i ntrodt~iced ~f;he ~ol l o~,~i nn. rs~~sol ts~t,i ori aru! n2nved i ts ad.o~t i nn: R:=S01_L'1'IO';! f.!0. 85-1?-`i31 - ADOPTI:"!G TF!~: ST'?E~T ~_ISf!TI~IC~ Pr)LICY AS !.'R"SE~1T..D I~Y h1R. BLIi>C~:i`::'~ °aae -1 ~3- ,^IepJT':S Ci ~t:y Cot~nc~i 1 D~c. 11, 1`?H5 Soooner Par!< !Cont.) Solid i.,~d5$~' '1c~enda Acid;tion The fore~~oino, resolutinn 4~~as d+Aly secor~ded f~y ~'^1s. ~~~larci4ni. Nyes (5) (~lesener, ~lareiini, F1hey, Scalz~, Collova. 'I~yes I01, ltesolution ~ec.larec( ad.opted. 'fhis r~solution app2ars in R~~solution '.;oo!< ~lo. lt, Pane ~r3;. I~1rs. Sc.al zF sug<7es~ted t,~at: the Ci ~;y establ ~i s;i a coi~r,ni t~tee on sol i d~rias~te. Sca~l ze ~~oi nt4~ci oui: tY~at State 1 a.s~ r2q~.ii res ttia~C i;n~ C'i t,y separate and rer_ycle so;id t•t~sf,e by 19~10. ~~ther coe~riunitir~s ai°? establishinc~ co~*~ini ttees. P1r. Fahny fel t 1:haL 199C1 ~,~as t;oo far ati~~~y t~ ~ s~r,ab~l ~i si~ a ca!1~,~~i ~tt.e2. ~ati~e;~ felt i;hat ~th^ 1aa~ coiAld ~h~n~e and too mucki can happE~ri ~in four y2ars t~ °stabl ~i ,I~~ a corm!i tt~c at thi s por nt. ;~ir. 3lesener suqgestecl that an a~~aar-r_ness <,~roup be ~ormed to rnoriitor the situ<ation and !«ep ~the Council in~forried on this subjec~C. 31es~ner s~aggeste<: that i,he group be limitec! to ts~~o or tPiree penple. `1r~s. Scalze ~intr~duced the fullo;vin{; resolution and move~ 'its adoption: R~S~LtITZOP! ~1~. 35-1?-583 - t:Sl"A13LTSFIT;~~IG I1N Il~a!ARt:P!ESS QROUP ,'~;~I!) r`~DVGR7ISIP~G FOR L'ITTZF~~~I S'P,RTT.(;TP,hTIO;,t OP! T~i~ ~ROUP 0•d TI{~c ;URJ~`,1. OF SOLID !~,qSTI= Th~ foreqoi nc~ resol uti on ~~;~as c!uly seconc(ecf bv 1~~r. [~1 es~ner. l1y~s E~i) Scalze, 3lesener, Collova, P!ardini. Id~,~~es tl) F~he~. Resol u~,i on dE~cl ar2d ad~opted. This resoluti~n apne<zrs in ~?esolut~on ?3ook ido. 12, P~ge ti36, Compar~bl:~ P~irs. Scalz~ asked tii~ si:ati.is of co;?iparable worth report. The Ci'tl blori:h Cl~:r~: repor~ted i:hat 'tne Cit:y fias fiiled ~for an ext2nsion, I~u~t has noi: aoi;t~n an anss~r<~r bac!:. t~n~nda qc~dii;inn i~1r. Fahey s:Agg~s~ec! 'cha~t ~thU C~ity Attorney dra~F9: a ~roposal on ~ui~is. The Clerk report;ed tha~ mos't cities ha.ve hirec( a c~nsulfant. 7he !;i~ty Attorney felt ti~at ~h~is was soraethinq !>a~rter 'nandl~d k>y the C'ity Clerk. Trie Clcrk can ta1!< to other cities i;o see s~ahat ~tYiey are doi ng and t=r4io the,y havc hi red. The .Attorney Tel t that ~1:'~ii s a1s an adnri ni s'i;rati ve progra.r,~. P1r. ; ahe,y i i~d~i cated t,~at !iF an4 the Ci ~~y ^1 erk t=ioul <i 'i oo!< at. tfie i ni ti al Frar~vtork ancl rrport bac!< s:o the Council. ?ace -20- ~'Iil!ITES ~~i~v Counci1 ~ler..l l , ~ c'q5 ;1poro~r~inc, '~^r. f'ahey ini:rod~.iced ~he ~Follo~riinn resolution ancl rnoved it.s adop~~ion: VOUC~I~I"S n4 S~)~_I)7 X~i~! ilO. i%')- ~~.-E>%:[~ .. ,nf~~~:~1\~1~~!i T~-~[' 110?IlCic1 i~nl)~~-~i:~~5 ~ -~'- Z~Blil ~'!0. ~ ~ The for~~~oi i~c,. resol ut'i q~i s~tas d~.~l ~i s2conded Sy f~?r. I;l Psen2r. Ay~~s (~;l ~ aricy, ?les£~ti~>r, Scalz2, Plar<i1r11, Collova. "!ay.^.s (0!. S;~so1ut9on ~)r.claretl adocited. The for~~c~oina resoli.ition aapears in Rnsolut.ion Book No. 12, Pape f37. a~'1 ann~~r ~ri °?r. ~al~ey su';~~rri t~tec' ~to ~ I~e Co!inci l a pol ~i <:y sta~~t^r~cnt ~iat;l i ni nc~ thr~ ~3uild'ina r;iA~ties ofi 9;i~e [~iui~dina (lffic~ia~l ~n~i thE~ City Planner rF~ciare'~inc t+ie Trs~ector d~velnpm~nt of Plats and/or °roposals. ficeridl ~~'r. ~3~lesener coir~~nAn~:ed th~t i~r ~rias t'ne concensus o~F ~:he Council ~(;ha~t all Ite~~i; ~!o. 17 r.or~r,~~trcia.l inatters ~dould~ go t:o the Planner. Council suqc7estc~i t'~~e fo1lo~:viriq amend~~ents ~t~ the propos~d ~~olir,y S'L1~L"x^.i11P,Y1'~;: ~ I~Cnm cG. 'L. -• 1111 co~:ir~ercial si~t2 pl~n revie~ris vi'n~ch c~o not involve request:s for cor~ditional us^ pereiits or varia.rc.es. Itern i;. 3. - All r^,i<+~ntia1 pla't.s of «,ore than ihr^z~ lots ~nri/or corie~ercial p1ats and develop!nent proposals ±~rt~ir,i~ i~nvolae rec?uesf;s for con~'i'tional use perniits an~!/or var9anc~s, and... i1r. i~l esen~r ~ n~roduc~d Ct~e fol l o~-?i np rESOI s~f,i on ~nd mvv^d i'Cs adopl:'i on: RF,SOLUTIOIJ !•1~, s1`i-1; -'.i~> - !1i)Q'.7TIt!!; T`iE POLICY >T!Arrj'1Fn,17 SU'r3P1TTT~f) RY ''•^,?, FAH~Y '>~:G/\`;1)Sl~IG 71iG POSITIOP~> fl~' THE CTTY !'L~l`~,I~'!; n,?~ID BUSLOIP~G O~-T.Cr_,nL ~;IITN Tl~i~ oUTLS~~1~D F~I~1L~1Di~1rP,fTS Tk~2 ~Poreqoi nq reso1 L~~ti on ,~as ciul y secondeci bv ~-ir. Co11 ova. n~~/~S ~~~ i'~FIE?Y~ ~3~~(.'SE?Yl!'.H~ ~0~70Vc1~ ?~~i1PC~lt1l ~ iCd~7_fa. ida~~es (~)). i~ 4 ~ ?t sol ~ai:i on c!ec1 ared ~do ~~~te~. 7i~is reso1i.rtion ap{~n_ars iri ~t~solu~~ion 8oo=t P!o. 12, Page 5;t<;. i'1 arir~'i ng ~~~~rs. Sca'I x.e stat.ed ~tPiat she a•ran~Ced ~'.o ror~~men~; 'the f'1 anni nn Cor.~~f,i ssi ori ~.0!'?i`1'ISiS10Yl 'f0i^ L`~(1F? Q00C~ 70b ~t~(1P.Y ~1c1V° C~OtIP. 4{l~:(1 Sd'f1Z~~ hd5 f)(?F?YI f)O~Ot"(:', ~~(1;'.i~'1 ~;~(115 ~li;S"t ~/E.'.dY'. SC"t3~7.C'. dC!:1101~l~E'..Ifjf?CI ~.'171.j; ~~;Sl^1^f.? ~~'1'r]VE? i>~?!~11 rl. ~`~:b^2 1')P01)~~°f~1S th'is past: year and hoped ~hat ~the Plannin~~ Coi~uniss'ion anc Co~incil could cont:inu2 on a uositive notF. Pdap _~~'~- ,iT?IUTF.S Ci ty Co~_mc'i 1 Dec. 11, 19t;5 ~~ 1t1111 Yl~ ~orami ss'i on (Cont:.! ''.`~'{11 @!11 Sf1 1~8~~1:y ~.dSfl !1c!enda Item ~~~lo. 17 Canadian Days ;u~ct:?$ Aqen~!a It~n, nlo. 17 1')&i, AttorneY's ~On~l"dCt ~genda It:em ~~o. 17 `~~1". ~~~P.S:?Il^Y' SU(',(!P~~,°(f t:1i.~'r rylOY'? Of J.YI f`f'~()"'l` JC? {'lil(IF' i,0 (jF?~; lYif'OY't"11'~10i1 to ~tiie i'lanninc! Comm~i;,sion on any it~~'~~ i,~ia9: c~mes up at a rn2e~t:in~. ~;1 esF~n2r° sugGe,tec t:hat - r. Co11 ova 1 on.l• i nto ne t+,i nn, t'nr_ "1 anni n<~ ~~OAII`-i1SS10Y1 1?1E~1?1~~P..Y'S Vi71^lOUS 0°V"lOG''1Ca~$ t~1d'C ~CN1P. ~;OI.IYIC'1~1Y1E'.111.~~_'Y'$ 1^f.'CC'1V(.'~ si.ic`i as frori t'ne I_eaque of ";innesot~~ Cities and the Rarnsey Leluue. `;7CS~'.1~^i" d~SO SUCjf;RS'CP.C~. 't~18~ il£?~i! 't~~<lllYllilQ :91"TS7SSl0'1 f~l(?!'li)4?Y'S d~:~E'YI(' ~~.Y'c111llYIC! Si'SS1~YtS. }Ch2 ~,1 tV Cl erf!< Yy'2(n1l1Pnit:P.C~ ~;(ld ~ tyl° ~~'~~;~;,y ~.ca :{1 ~' IIYIC~ I)('. P(`,U~ f?Ill S'rlt?C~. l il 1.4~~ (i~~~n~~t~t ~ I ry I )`l.',1~~ F;;SSt)I_UTTOPI fd0. `>>_~?_5clii _ ~PPI.i_PiIc47t,IG 7HE S~i:iTY r!~`,~~5 ~U~l~ S;I TI~IE ~1~ti0'!htT 0~= $15Q.00 The fore~~oi rig resol u ti on ~-~as di_il y secondec! hy °'~r. Fah~y. A9^s (`-; ~!ardini, Fahey, ~allava, Sca1ze, Slesener. Z~~ayes (t)1. Resolut'lon de.r,lared udo{>i.ec::. Tn i s resol uti on ~npears i n!?.~sol uti on `300!< ?lo. 12, Pa~e 6?`? T{~e .^,i±y Cterk r~;ques~Y,e~ ~;~~~t th2 Coi.mcil clar'if,y tl~ie ~i~~ount: of raer~ies budge'ted ~for Canadiai~ '?ays durin~: 1Saf35. tir. Faliey introduced the follo.~rir~r resolutir~n and rno~i~ti its adop~l:~on: ftc.S01_UTID'ii h,!0, H`.i-12-i%;7 - CI~ARI!=YIP~1G ~~501_f1TI~li~1 i10. "`i-%-37' 3Y D~SLAitI'.!~:~ T~l11T .`•,;1 ~000 !~!,~S !3UD!'xGiTED r~n rJiiill~I"P! D/\YS I?d 1~8i ,~ill) `50~) !dqS 'tU~1F~:TF~~ ~OR POi_IC` P"'OTrC7T~^! ~`1T 7!~'~ C1~i.I!1~T1!,~! il,~YS CEI.i-!1R,'17T!1t,1 Z;I ~g35 Tn~ for:~c~oi nn r~sol uti on ~r~as ~~ialy seronder~ b/ P1s. ,~!ardi ni . F1~/;~s (Ei) f~ahey, ~?ardini, Coll~~va, Sca1ze, '~lescner. r~~~y~, ;o). R25olution d~clareel adopCed. This resolul:ion app~ars in Resolution !?ook No. 12, Pac~e Ei40. fi-1s, hlardini ini;roduced t:h2 folloaiinq resol~.rtion anrt movad its ad~r~tion: 2{ S01_UTIO(I ;,In, <,5-1 Z-':^g - API~R01IIid~; TfI!: !1TT0'~ilf'Y S COi~!TR:4rT c-nn 19~~b The foregoii~g resol.~~tion a~~tas duly ser.ond~c'- by »ir. ~i ~sen2r. i~,yE15 ~ri~ i~~dl"(~.'1!11~ Fi~°S?i14'1^~ ~O~~OVd~ ~C[1~Z.C'~ Fd4l~}/. i~layes (`i). Resolt~ition declared adop~ted. T'nis resolu~tion appears in R~solut:~ion '3ook `~o. 12, Pane G4~1. ?dnP _o?_ ^iIh!UTPS City ',ounr,il ;)nr, ~ ~~ , ~ ~~f'{r ~ 1°3a ~inc~in~er s l;ontr~ct P'!s. c~!srcin~ introtluced the fol1ov~inc r2so1i.~tion anc` moa~~ its aclop~'inn: +~r~n~fa !:~SOI_UTIOpI 'I(1, ~6-1?-;39 - P,PP~t(?'JTplr~ T!I~: It^?'1 ''.l0. 17 !-~+1r~Ii~F.`'R S!'~t%1C7 FOR ln9i(i ~~ilE'. 'F01"^.~~~OIYI^ Y'^SO~IIL`1011 :!d$ (SU~V SC'COt1fJ^f! ~)y '.~t" !i~(?52i1^Y'. /~`/@'S ~.~,~~ ~•I~Y'l,ilY11~ '~~°SQII(?1"~ C;O~~ONd~ SCd~7.~~ i-d{l~'~/. hlftyt'S (0). [?2solu~tion c.2cla.red adonted. ~(71S PE?SO~1.ItlpYi t1f)q°dPS 'I!i ~~cSO~U'`~.'IOYI `i00~: ''~0. ~i~~ ~~8.(i(~ )~1~. CPia~r~ber O~i ~'~9s. i~lardini reporte~ t'riat ~Sie CYiai~iber of ''oi.~!~:ierce ~is =~ut~ina t oq~t4icr Comrnercr~ a h!e.!eor:ier °a.c'~<e~t and i s as~'i na for a conl.ri i~u'ti on o~F `>~~ for those ;~~lc~~, r ,=~ho iri 11 `iaw~ ~:h~i r naM^s 1 i strd on t he nac,!<et to he1 n def'ray ~:Y!^ COSfS. Aq^nda I'te~n `!o. 17 f'!r. Col l ova i ntro~'uceci t'n2 fo11 ovri r7~7 reso1 u~ti on an d rio~ted i ts adop'ti nn: R1~~01_UTTO[d i~10. 8[i-1?-Ei~70 - l~UTHO°IZItiG TN~: I;T>r;lPtSt •,tcp:IT Of" ~>0 1'0 7N!= rI~A,"~tiR ~L'' COi1P ~:T~' I"OR TFIF l tS7S •~'; Oi- -rl~l~' L'TTY' S~1Fl'~.f' ~)'~d ITS ~„~~i.ICOr, ~rn PAC':'.-Tii Th~ ~forer~oi ~r r~sol i.i~ i on vaas ~iu1y se~ond^d by ~~s. "dar~i~ i~i . {1~/C?5 ~ri~ r0~~~0y8~ I~{t11"(illll~ ~i~C'.SE?Y12i"~ iCd77_i~~ ,F'~~'1F.y. i~'8V^S i~,. (?~so1 ~~~P.~i on decl arr~~c! adopt~d. T'ri'is resolution apnea.rs in Pesolu~t'ion Bool< !~lo. 12, Pane 6n3. 1"r!ast ~< T~i~ ::ity Cler'< rec~i~este~ ~t'nat i;he Council ~~prove the ~:ransfer o~F Anenry Furic# '611, 5'.il ~froe, t'~e Trust and Rcency `~und ~to th~~ Gencral Pund. Transfer i~lrs. Scalze in~Crodi.iCeri ~C.he follo„r~n~; rFSOIu'Cion and mpved ~its a<<o~~tion: genda n . Addi~ion ,`=S~IIITIGPI In "5-lI ~i91 - T~'AI~S~'"s~ttT~f~, ^11,~i51 i"RO-~ T'IF T'~Uti7 Ar~!1) l1(il:i!CY ~~li.l!? (~+! v~ ~1y- ;rl1t°Tpdr~) TO TN~: C;(=~IER.AI_ f~Uldtl Ti9P {OY'E?OOlilC Y'860~Ut10ft l=Ii.YS C~I1~V S@'.C071C~P,(~ hy ~'it". t'di9!?~J. l~~/2S ~~>~ SCd~%B~ i'8.~1!,'.y~ R~^S4`.11~'.Y'~ t`~;)i"(~~Itll~ (.0~~0`!d. ':~iitViS ~~)t. R2soli.ition c'eclarec+ adoutc~e'. ~~15 Y'85~~1.l~lOtl dpPQaY'S lll ~2.L°SO~lIt;1011 `fi00~~< ~IO. ~i ~ ~~7~fp ?~4. ?<aC!G -73- I 1-!I1~:UTE_> ~1 ~_y ~OUIICI ~ ~)f3C. ~~ ~ 7~i,3~ lld;iourri 4r~n!l ~ d j h;.c~ ~,i~ ~ ~~ ~dr. f?l:~scner i ntroduceci ~t{~e fol l o~-ai nq resol uti ori a!~d raoved ~i ts ~~ctop~ri on: ~^,ESOLUTSON i~JO. 85-12-542 - dIDJ~URNI~lr The ~foreqoinn r2solution ~~,as <tuly s~~conded by ~1r. I=a.Yiey. ,~~,%°S ~J~~~~~^S£Il°1^~ ;=df1<.~y~ CO~~OVd~ '18Y'l1,111'I~ SCd~ZC?. ri~y`S !~)~, !~PS0~11'L"lOtl Ci°C~dl^f~(' il<~Opt?C+,. '!'Piis resol+a~tion appears in ttesolu'tion ~~ook Vo. 1L, Paqe rn.5. TP;~re beinc; nn ft.ir~iier bus'ine,s, th,~ e~entinq ~nas a~°~ourned at 10:~'r5 P.±`.9. ~?~spec'cfully su'orii~t;teci, , ~ _ ( < << ~_~y, ~2~_~ : i ,'`' ~C~, ~~~~r~ ~~lan~er ~- ~ecorc!inn. Secre~tary i~ac)^ -2~-