My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-23-86 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
04-23-86 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:24:31 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:51:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />April 23, 1986 <br />Valento Mr. Fahey reported that his preference was to have a road out to <br />Property LaBore Road. Fahey suggested that Valento come back to the Council <br />(Cont.) when he had some more definite plans. <br />Aspen Mr. Fahey opened the public hearing on the Aspen Grove Addition <br />Grove Addition proposal for 38 single family homes. Fahey reported that Mr. <br />Goff, the developer, failed to appear at the Planning Commission <br />Agenda meeting and, therefore, the Planning Commission did not act on <br />Item No. 8 the proposal. <br />Fahey suggested that the Council <br />table action until it receives a <br />Commission. <br />hold the public hearing, but <br />recommendation from the Planning <br />Fahey pointed out that the proposal was consistent with what the <br />Council indicated to Mr. Goff that it would like to see. Al1 City <br />ordinances have been met. <br />Mrs. Scalze asked who would own Outlot A. <br />Mr. Pat Goff, developer, replied that if the City wishes, this <br />area could be dedicated for park land. Otherwise if the City <br />does not want the property, he would plat to the edge of it. <br />Scalze reported that the Park Commission has recommended that Outlot A <br />and the triangular piece be dedicated as Goff's park dedication fee, <br />and no cash would be collected on the homes. <br />Scalze reported that the ponding on the property could remain, but <br />it may have to be relocated to accommodate a trail system through <br />the property. <br />P1r. 6off stated that he was agreeable. <br />Scalze asked who would construct the pond. Mr. Goff replied <br />that he would. Scalze asked about the slope. Goff replied that <br />he was waiting for word from NSP on what they would like. <br />Scalze reported that a deep hole might not be acceptable to the <br />City. <br />Goff reported that he is flexible from a swail to whatever type <br />of pond the City might request. <br />Mr. Fahey suggested that the Engineer look into this matter. <br />There was no one else from the audience wishing to speak on this <br />request. <br />Page -10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.