Laserfiche WebLink
f~lI ~IUTF S <br />City Council <br />June 2.5, 1986 <br />Y.inqsbiary they were required to subrnit topos. 'Cinc~sbury as'~ed if topos saere <br />Drainage required of the neighber as ~>>ell. :ingsbury pointed out that both <br />(Cont.) fill perinits were granted ahout the same time. <br />Fahey suggested that the matter be tabled for two ~aeeks to allow <br />the Engineer time to review the problem. <br />P~s. Mardini introduceci the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />R~SOLUTIOPI i~10. 96-6-1_fiII - It~IST2UCTIhlG TFIE <br />CITY F~IGINEER TO REVIF4d THE CULVERT SITUATION <br />tdFAR THF KI~GSV3URY PROPERTY ON LAf30RE ROAD F~S <br />~rtELL AS TI-IE FIL.LT~G TFIAT HAS 136E~1 DONE OPI TNIF <br />PROPER7Y ADJAf,ENT TO Tf~G KINGS!3i1i"ty PROPERTY <br />The foregoin~ resolu'cion ~Nas duly seconded by P1rs. Scalze. <br />l~yes (4) Nardini, Scalze, Collova, Fahey. <br />~lays (0). <br />Resolution declared ac~opted. <br />This resolution appears in Resoli.ition Boo!< Plo, 15, Pane 26~. <br />?~li;<e P~1ike Kennedy, representing .F.xecuteam Corporation, apoeared before <br />Kennedy the Council and reported that his firm is proposing to build a <br />Office 6,000 square foot office building at the corner of Centerville <br />6ui1ding Road and Little Canada Road. The firm has purchased the property <br />contingent upon concept approval. The principle business that <br />Agenda v~ould occupy the building would be a graphic arts business svith <br />Item Alo> 10 10 employeFS, while thc remainder of the building l~ould be <br />rented out. Fls the principle business grows, they 4•~oulci then <br />occupy the remaind.er of tii2 buitding. <br />Scalze oointed out that there is another piece of property adjacent <br />to the one !+ir. ICennedy is discussing. Scalze asked if Executeam <br />might be interested in purchasing this property as atell and <br />building a larger building ~•iith the assistance of tax increment <br />financing. <br />ICennedy stated that h2 viould have to consider this. hlov+ever, <br />Kennedy stated that he t•~ould li'~ce to go ahead edith the development <br />1s proposed and not have the development made contingent upon <br />the purchase of the adjacent property> <br />Fahey pointed out that the proposal meets City Code. <br />P1r. Collova fe1t that the development looked good. <br />The Planner pointed out that if tax incrernent financing may be <br />involved, this area s•~ould have to be put in a development district. <br />The llttorney pointecl out that the pronerty is ~•~ithin the realignment <br />of Little Canada Road, and suggested that Kennedy chec!c this out. <br />Page -13- <br />