06-25-86 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MiniurFs City Council June 25, 19~E Hardees Mr. Ed Nasek, Dalgren, Shardlow and Uban, Consulting f~lannerc c,nd Landscape Architects, represerrting Hardees, appeared before the Agenda Commission. flase!c presented the latest proposal Por the development Item Mo. 11 of a tlardees restaurant at the intersection of Ptinnesota Avenue and Rice Street. Fiasel< reported that the proposal meets all Code requirements except for access onto Rice Street. i-lasek pointeci out that the acc2ss to i-1innesota Avenue svas moved Farther to the east to provide for more stackirig of cars on Minnesota. Fllso one additional parking snace 4vas added and a customer-4~~aiting par~<iny area edas also added. Scalze stated that she vras concerned about Nardees customers dumping into the Ue S< Sydim &~itness parking lot as well as future ousinesses that Faill be located on the Schroeder property. Scalze ~~r~,s also concerned about the access to Rice Street across frorn 4loodbridge Avenue. Scalze nointad out that this access F~~ou1d be shared by Hard2es as well as another business. ~iasak felt t'nat the access could be covered by a co~snon easement agreement betuieen the tN~o businesses. Fahe,y stated that he ~;~as not against the la.y-out of the Hardees restaurant, but was not in Favor of unlimited in and o~.+t left- turn traffic onto Rice Street at the access across from l~loodbridge. Fahey felt that this access shoutd be right-turn in and. out only. Fahey pointed out the traffic probler~s ~~tith P~cDonalds and did not ~~rant to add to this situation. Fahey stated that iie would also tike to see a roadway built between U. 5. Swim R, Fitness and this property. Fahcy felt that the road should be a private one, but be built to City standards. Fahey did not feel that 50 feet of right-of-way 1~aas necessary, ,just enough roorn for the blacktop mat. ~lasek replied tYiat they had no problem living aiith a right-turn in and out access across from 4~loocibridge. However, they ~dere not in favor of platting the northern access to Rice as a cul-de-sac miy be necessary and this saould take too much property. Fahe,y felt that only about 25 feet of roadway would be necessar,y. FahPy felt the road svas necessary to control the traffic into the U. S. Swirn ~ fitness site. Nardini felt curb and gutter a~rould be necessary evith designat~d accesses into the sites. Scalze pointecl aut that the two accesses to Ric~ Street are only about 1gQ feet apart. Scalze did not feel that two accesses ~•aere necessary. Scalze fclt that the northern access s~~as all that 4•aas necessary. Page -14-