07-02-86 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

P~iZ;~lUT~S City Counci1 July 2, 1936 Imo. Mos. The n~xt improvem^nts considered ti~~are Lake Street froni Jackson ~36-b & ~to ! a<esPior~ by street, curb and cuatter anc! Fast Rose Plar.e ~6-9 from Jac'<son to I_a!<e~~shore and La',~cshore from F.ast 2ose P1 ace to Lai<e Street ay s~tre~t over1ay. Assessments for Imn. Pdo. 8G-fi, La!<e Street, are c~stii~iatec{ ~t ~'1..5.7~ per front foot for street. and ~,10.!17 per front foot for ciart, and nutter. Tfie tlssessment ~for Imn, tdo. flo-9, East Rose Place and. ~a!:eshore is estir~iated a9: ~6,50 per front foo~ ~Por s~rcet over1ay. Th~ City has receiveri a netition from the residents of the area ooposing the improvements. The City Fn~7ineer reported that ~:he only storm se~ler im~~rovemf~ni planned for this area is to renlac~ a colla4>sed pip^ af. tha intersection of Lakes~ior~ ancl I_a~;n Streets. S~ndra Yunker, r~sid~nt on l.ake Street, reported tliat all the property o~.,mers in the area ~xc2pt on;~ sinned t~ie getition opnosing the ir:iprovernents. ~~h~y informe~i the residents tha4: if tne City does not arder tlie improvement no~~, thcre may r.orne a time ~;~hen tne street is in surh a state that tYie City svill be forrec' to order ~he i;nprovement. One of the prol~l ems at ~that poi nt +,~roul d be tti~t tYie resi dents ti~ioulcl losa t'r~e benefi~ of a lo~~er rate b.y having this t~roject combi ned eai th o~th~rs. ~ >calze asked ~,i'~y Lake Street t,~as not proposed for overlayinn as East I?os~ °lace and La!ceshore. ~ The ~.nyineer replied tnat the street '~as no curb ancl qutter and is also t~ie oldest of the three sCreets beinc+ cl~scuassed. Florence Dousi, Lake Street, statpci ~that she swas oppose~l ~to ~t:he improvement and pointed out that sh~ is sti11 payiny ass~ssments for the iiuprovement of I_akeshore. It s~ias pointecl out that Lakeshore and East Rose Place ar~ just pro7~osed to be overl ayed ind the cost of th~t ~aoi,il ci be o6.50 p~~r fron~ foqt. 7i~ere ti~tas somF~ concern ~~~ith the ;~etition that Y.tie residents along Fast Rose Plac~ and Lai<eshore kvere not a~s~are of f;hi s and th~i:ight that th~i r str~~ts +~oul tl be reconstructed. f)ouq I.ois, ?.9G0 I_ak~shore, stated that he ~vas in favor of the ov2rl~y. liarold Feich~rt, 25S0 ",iorth Jac!<son, statec'< tnat ~~e a~fas oppose<( to the reconstruction of la!:e 5tre^<t and indicatecl that curb anc rutter are n~etlecl on Jac!:son. Page _,;_