Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />March 11, 1987 <br />Gambling The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by h1rs. <br />License Ayes (4) LaValle, Scalze, Fahey, Collova. <br />St. Joseph's Nays (0). <br />Society Resolution declared adopted. <br />(Cont.) This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, <br />Scalze. <br />Page 118. <br />Council discussed the copy of a letter they received regarding <br />Little Canada Charitable Bingo which states that no employee of <br />the bingo operation employed after March 11, 1987 can work at <br />another bingo operation. Council felt that while the policy was <br />inequitable, it was an internal matter of the bingo operation and <br />not one the City would become involved in. <br />Fahey also noted that he has heard of internal friction between the <br />various charities involved in the bingo operation, and wanted to <br />put the charities on notice that should they not be able to resolve <br />this problem, he would not vote in favor of the renewal of their <br />license in June. <br />Cellular Council noted that there has been no contact on the part of Cellular <br />One One with the City regarding the conditional use permit application <br />Conditional which has been before the Council during the past several months. <br />Use Permit <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 8 RESOLUTION N0. 87-3-109 - CANCELLING <br />THE CELLULAR ONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />APPLICATION <br />The foregoing resolution was dulys econded by D9r. Fahey. <br />Ayes (4) Scalze, Fahey, LaValle, Collova. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Page 119. <br />Mrs. Scalze suggested that the proposed text amendment pertaining <br />to essential services be deleted. Scalze pointed out that the <br />text amendment came about due to Cellular One's request to build <br />a tower in Little Canada. Scalze did not feel that the City should <br />put developers on notice that it is seeking another tower. <br />The City Attorney reported that the current code did not deal with <br />the tower issue and Cellular One was of the impression that a tower <br />was a permitted use. However, the City Planner and City Attorney <br />convinced Cellular One that the text amendment was necessary to <br />include towers as conditional uses. The City Attorney felt that <br />Page -7- <br />