Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />March 25, 1987 <br />Zoning Mr. Collova introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Revisions <br />(Cont.) RESOLUTION N0. 87-3-116 - CONTINUING THE <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ZONING REVISIONS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) Collova, Blesener, Scalze, LaValle, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Page 127. <br />Tima Land Mr. Louie Tima appeared before the Council requesting approval of <br />Conveyance the conveyance of part of his property to his daughter and son-in-law <br /> who are adjacent property owners. Mr. Tim a submitted a Certificate <br />Agenda of Survey depicting the land conveyance. Tima pointed out that an <br />Item No. 6 additional lot is not being created, only a lot line i s being moved. <br />Mrs. Scalze expressed concern that in the fut~re the City may want <br />to install a cul-de-sac at the end of Australian Avenue. If the <br />lot line adjustment is approved, then the City will have to deal <br />with two property owners on this matter rather than one. <br />Fahey pointed out that an additional lot is not being created at <br />this time, and it may be that the property will be considered <br />unbuildable due to the lack of the cul-de-sac at the end of <br />Australian. <br />Scalze felt that any approval should indicate that the property <br />would be unbuildable until such time as the cul-de-sac is improved. <br />Mrs. Thomas Judd, Mr. Tima's daughter, pointed out that an additional <br />lot is not being requested at this time and she is aware that the <br />cul-de-sac would need to be installed before the property could be <br />divided. <br />Scalze felt strongly that any approval of the lot line adjustment <br />should indicate the property was not dividable at this time. <br />Blesener felt that the access question could be dealt with at the <br />time there was a request to divide the property. <br />Fahey stated that he would support approval of the lot line adjustment, <br />however, any potential purchaser of the property should be aware that <br />the property is unbuildable without the cul-de-sac at the end of <br />Australian being improved. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Page -4- <br />