Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />April 22, 1987 <br />Strohbeen/ <br />Ducharme <br />Lot Split <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 11 <br />Laurie Strohbeen and Therese Decharme have applied for a subdivision <br />of the property located at 3001 LaBore Road. The proposal would take <br />a small triangle of property from the rear of 930 Westwind and add <br />it to the property in question, then split the larger parcel into <br />two lots. <br />Fahey reported that the Planning Commission has recommended approval <br />subject to the small secondary residential dwelling being demolished <br />and the existing garage relocated to meet setback requirements, <br />and subject to the City Attorney and Engineer making a recommendation <br />on bonding requirements to ensure that these conditions are met. <br />Laurie Strohbeen appeared before the Council asking the Council's <br />feelings on the development potential of the property and also if <br />the Council would approve a gravel road into the property so that <br />two lots could be divided. <br />Fahey replied that the City cannot allow the creation of lots that <br />would not front on an improved public street. Fahey also commented <br />that if the applicants are considering other development proposals <br />for the property, they should present these to the Planner and go <br />back before the Planning Commission. <br />Blesener commented that there is no reason for the Council to approve <br />the addition of the small piece of property to the Ducharme property <br />if the applicants are not sure of what they want to do with the <br />property. <br />Strohbeen asked that the Council consider the original proposal. <br />Scalze asked if the property owners were willing to remove the <br />dwelling and relocate the garage. <br />Strohbeen replied that they were. <br />Fahey reported that in view of the comments of the neighbors who <br />attended the Planning Commission meeting he felt that as a condition <br />of approval auto repair work of unowned vehicles had to stop as <br />well as the removal of all unowned vehicles from the property. <br />Fahey felt that the property should be cleaned up and this was <br />the opportunity for the City to get this done. <br />Strohbeen reported that there is no longer auto repair work being <br />done on the premises. <br />David Brausen also reported that non-owned vehicles have been removed <br />and that he was willing to abide by Mr. fahey's suggestions. <br />Scalze asked why the proposed property line through the large lot <br />was not straight. <br />Page -17- <br />