Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 13, 1987 <br />City Pin <br />Agenda <br />Addition <br />Bids For <br />Dump Body <br />For Pick- <br />Up Truck <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 16a <br />Mr. Fahey suggested that the City conduct a contest or competition <br />for the creation of a City pin. <br />Scalze suggested that the Mayor look into having a designer create <br />a pin and felt that the City might be limited in the types of design <br />by a competition. <br />Fahey stated that he would research the matter further. <br />Blesener reported that the City recently took bids for a dump body <br />for the new pick-up truck that is on order. The following bids were <br />received: <br />Crysteel Truck Equipment $4,687 <br />L & Z Company $4,424 <br />Truck Utilities $4,780 <br />Blesener reported that the L& Z bid had to be disqualified as it <br />did not meet City specifications. <br />It was the recommendation of Public blorks that the Crysteel Truck <br />Equipment bid be accepted and awarded. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 87-5-208 - ACCEPTING AND AWARDING <br />THE BID OF CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT IN THE <br />AMOUNT OF $4,687 FOR THE PURCHASE OF A DUMP BODY <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by ~4r. Fahey. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Fahey, Scalze, Collova, LaValle. <br />Dlays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Page 226. <br />Street Mr. Blesener reported that the developers of the Westwinds Development <br />Lighting are requesting the same type of street lighting on their new street <br />In Westwinds as they have on the first street in the development. The request is <br />for ornamental lighting and 8 street lights. <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 16c Blesener reported that the City has a new street lighting policy in <br />place that was not in place when the first street was put in. Under <br />the street lighting policy, the developer would be required to pay <br />for the ornamental lights, and only about two street lights would be <br />permitted. <br />Blesener reported that he recommends that the City allow the developer <br />to install the ornamental lights at his own expense, and that any <br />lights over what is provided for by City policy, the property owners <br />would have to pay for the cost of operation. Blesener suggested that <br />the property owners could be billed or assessed this cost. <br />Page -13- <br />