Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 13, 1987 <br />Street The City Clerk thought that an ordinance may have to be drawn up <br />Lighting to allow the City the authority to assess the cost of operation of <br />In the additional street lights. <br />Westwinds <br />(cont.) The City Attorney agreed that a new ordinance would have to be <br />enacted and the City would have to hold an assessment hearing <br />at the time it wanted to assess the costs. The Attorney pointed <br />out that the City can assess for up to a 5-year period. The Attorney <br />suggested that he research this matter. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION PJO. 87-5-209 - APPROVING THE <br />ADDITIONAL STREET LIGHTS REQUESTED BY THE <br />WESTWINDS DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT TO STUDY <br />BY THE CITY ATTORNEY OF THE FEASIBILITY OF <br />INSTALLATION OF THESE LIGHTS BEING PAID <br />FOR BY THE DEVELOPER AND THE COST OF RUNNING <br />TNE ADDITIONAL LIGHTS OVER THE CITY'S LIGHTING <br />POLICY BEING PAID FOR BY THE HOMEOWNERS ON A <br />YEARLY BASIS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Collova. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Collova, LaValle, Blesener, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Page 227. <br />Blesener pointed out that similar requests may be coming from other <br />new developments in the City, and the operation of these additional <br />lights could become quite costly to the City, if not assessed back <br />to the property owners. <br />IAoodpiles Fahey reviewed the information submitted by theCounty Health Department <br />regarding diseases carried by rodents as well as their recommendation <br />Agenda for the enactment of an ordinance regulating the storage of wood. <br />Item No. 17a <br />Based on the information received from the County as well as the <br />recommendation of the Building Inspector, Fahey suggested that <br />City ordinance require that woodpiles be elevatedat.heights of at <br />least 8 inches, or stored on an impervious surface, and that a woodpile <br />be allowed in the side or rear yard, however, not within the required <br />side or rear yard setback. <br />Blesener felt that City ordinance should set some minimum distance <br />that a woodpile can be located next to a residence. <br />Council felt that a distance of 1 foot should be required between <br />residences and woodpiles. <br />Page -14- <br />