Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 27, 1987 <br />Bingo Wylie commented that it is not the case of some charities being <br />(Cont.) asked to provided financial information and others are not. <br />Ltylie stated that as long as the trustees are not involved in <br />gambling, LCCB, Inc. qualifies under State law. Also, LCCB <br />has a real and valuable asset in the lease which exists, and <br />also has a right to the concessions at the hall. LCCB has <br />spent time in protecting that right and in attempting to comply <br />with State law. Wylie noted that Mugs Plardini who has been <br />appointed as a trustee is not involved with any of the charities, <br />nor is she involved in the operation of the bingo games. <br />Wylie explained that the term trustee was chosen to differentiate <br />from that of Qoard Member. <br />LaValle commented that it was his understanding from the meeting <br />of the Gambling Board that the trusteeship will not be a viable <br />thing under State law, and that the Board will next be looking <br />at the Arden Hills operation. <br />Wylie asked Mr. LaValle to disqualify himself from voting on the <br />license renewal applications because of a conflict of interest. <br />t~ylie stated that it was his understanding that LaValle has presented <br />to at least one or more charities a proposal for a direct lease with <br />P~over Warehouse, Inc., and that LaValle appeared before charitable <br />organizations to present and/or propose those organizations sign <br />leases with Plovers t~arehouse. <br />LaValle stated that that was a lie and reported that he was invited <br />to the Lake Owasso Children's Home to speak to their group on bingo. <br />LaValle suggested to the group that they furnish the Council a <br />letter of interest in bingo in the City, and if the City has bingo <br />after June 1, they would be considered by the Council for a license. <br />LaValle also reported that Robert Mattson spoke with him and another <br />Council member regarding bingo to raise funds for a Roseville youth <br />group. LaValle suggested that Mattson discuss this with the <br />Little Canada Recreation Association. <br />Fahey stated that it was LaValle's decision whether or not a conflict <br />of interest exists, however, it did not appear that one did. <br />Benson stated that his previous comments did not include a statement <br />that some of the charities were requested to provide financial <br />information to the State. Benson stated that he indicated that LCCB <br />was requested to provided this information, not specific charities. <br />Benson also requested that if it is the decision of the Council to <br />veto the license renewal, that his charities' applications not be <br />vetoed, but rather tabled because they do not have a lease. <br />Fahey stated that if the Council concludes that it will not allow <br />gambling in Little Canada in absence of individual leases, is Benson's <br />request due to his feeling that Servants of Mary and St. Joseph's <br />will have valid leases after June l. <br />Page -25- <br />