Laserfiche WebLink
P-1INUTES <br />City Council <br />June 24, 1987 <br />Thunder Bay <br />2nd Add. <br />(Cont.) <br />The City Clerk reported that the corner lot in the Westwind Development <br />is 100 feet wide by 163 feet deep. <br />P1r. Collova introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION P10. 87-6-280 - APPROVING TNE FIDIAL <br />PLAT FOR THE THUDIDER BAY 2ND ADDITION AS <br />PRESENTED SUBJECT TO THE DEDICATION OF A 10- <br />FOOT PERP9ADlENT WALKI+IAY EASEMENT BET4IEEN LOTS <br />6 AND 7 WITFI A 6-FOOT BLACKTOP PATH ON THAT <br />EASEMENT AND A a~-FOOT HIGH FENCE ON EITHER <br />SIDE OF THE PATH TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE <br />DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE QASED ON THE RECOP1P1ENDATION <br />OF THE PARK COMMISSI0~1 AND FURTHER SUBJECT TO <br />THE REQUIREMEPJT OF A 40-FOOT FRONTYARD SETBACK <br />ON TRACT A, RATIiER THAN 30 FEET TO ENSURE TNAT <br />TtiE NEW HOMES ON THE STREET LINE UP <br />Rusch CUP <br />E~ Vari ance <br />For Garage <br />Relocation <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 8 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. LaValle. <br />Ayes (4) Collova, LaValle, Blesener, Fahey. <br />Plays (1) Scalze. <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Page 305. <br />Blesener suggested that the Planner review the ordinance regarding <br />lot widths for corner lots and also review other cities' ordinances <br />in this regard. alesener stated that he would like to see corner <br />lots have the same opportunity to build as wide a house as a 75-foot <br />lot. <br />Fahey requested that the Planner report to the Council on this at <br />the second meeting in July. <br />Fahey opened the public hearing on the application of Theran Rusch <br />for conditional use permit for garage relocation as well as a 5-foot <br />variance for garage placement. Fahey pointed out that the Planning <br />Commission voted to deny the variance because the criteria for <br />hardship was not met. The Planner has also recommended against the <br />variance request. <br />P1r. Fred Rusch appeared before the Council outlining the past history <br />of the property as well as the property values in the area. Rusch <br />felt that the variance was warranted due to the condition of <br />surrounding properties and the fact that the property was devalued <br />when it was rezoned to prohibit construction of a duplex. <br />George Rossez, property owner in the area, stated that he was not <br />opposed to the variance request. <br />Page -13- <br />