Laserfiche WebLink
PIINUTES <br />City Council <br />Sept. 23, 1987 <br />Slumberland LaValle asked if the size of the sign could be scaled down and the <br />(Cont.) corporate-logo still maintained. <br />Lange felt the readability of the sign from the freeway would be <br />diminished. <br />Fahey asked what the increased readability of the sign was with a <br />height of 40 feet. <br />Lange felt the height variance would simply allow the sign to be <br />more easily understood, and the sign area variance would present <br />a stronger image. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 87-9-439 - CLOSING THE <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SLUMBERLAND REQUEST <br />FOR SIGN VARIANCES <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 18, Page h64. <br />Fahey pointed out that both the Planning Commission and Planner have <br />recommended that the sign height variance be approved. Fahey stated <br />that he felt the topography of the site was such to warrant a sign <br />height variance. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 87-9-440 - DENYING THE <br />SLUMBERLAND SIGN HEIGNT VARIANCE AS <br />REQUESTED <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (2) Scalze, Blesener. <br />Nays (3) Fahey, Collova, LaValle. <br />Resolution denied. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 18, Page 465. <br />Fahey pointed out that it will take four affirmative votes of the <br />Council to pass a variance request. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Page -3- <br />