10-28-87 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PIINUTES City Council October• 28, 1987 Centerville The City Attorney informed the Council that there is nothing to report Road Ar~ea as yet in the Center~ville Road ar•ea. Agenda Addition Video The City Planner• r~epor•ted that the Video Update building is a non- Update confor~ming use under• the industr~ial zoning of the pr~oper~ty. Also, Building since the business has not oper~ated on the pr•emises for• almost a year•, under• City or•dinance it is not allowed to r~e-establish. Agenda The Planner• also pointed out that the building has been damaged to Addition gr•eater than 50% of its value, and under or~dinance could not be r•ebuilt. The P1 anner• r•epor•ted that i f the pr•oper•ty i s r~edevel oped, a bui 1 di ng would have to meet industr~ial setbacks which would allow only a 20 foot by 36 foot building on the site. The City Planner• asked the Council their~ opinion on the pr•oper~ty and whether• or• not the cur•r•ent building should be condemned. Blesener~ felt that the building should be condemned as it is unsafe. Blesener• also felt that any new development on the pr•oper•ty should meet industrial Code r•equir~ements. Scalze, Collova and Fahey agr~eed that the ar~ea should be cleaned up. Mrs. Scalze intr~oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 87-10-529 - AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH CONDEPINATION OF THE VIDEO UPDATE BUILDING ON RICE STREET AS IS APPROPRIATE UNDER STATE LAW The for•egoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Blesener•. Ayes (5) Scalze, Blesener, Collova, Vahey, LaValle. Nays (0). Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 18, Page 559. Saiko The City Attor•ney submitted for• appr•oval a tempor~ary easement on Easement the Saiko pr~oper•ty for~ the impr•ovement of Demont Str~eet. The Attor~ney Agenda r~epor~ted that the City pr•eviously appr•oved a tempor•ar~y easement for• Addition this pr~oper~ty, however•, since the length of the pr•oject has been extended, the easement is being extended to an 11 month easement. The cost of the easement has also been incr~eased to $674.00. Mr•s. Scalze introduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: Page -24-