Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />October 28, 1987 <br />Waite Mr: Fahey introduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: <br />Pr•oper•ty <br />Division RESOLUTION N0. 87-10-511 - RECONSIDERING <br />(Cont.) RESOLUTION N0. 87-10-507 APPROVING THE <br />ROCKNE WAITE PROPERTY DIVISION REQUEST <br />The for•egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Blesener~. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declar•ed adopted. <br />This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 18, Page 539. <br />Fahey suggested that the pr•operty division r•equest to divide the <br />pr•oper•ty into thr~ee lots be denied as the applicant has indicated <br />that he is not r~equesting a var•iance for• lot area, and one is needed <br />for• the combination of Lots 18, 19 and 20 as this r~esulting lot would <br />be less than 10,000 squar•e feet in size. <br />Fahey also pointed out that the Council has no infor•mation befor~e it <br />showing how r4r•. Waite would like the pr?oper•ty divided into two lots. <br />Fahey also noted that it has been the Council's intention to gr~ant <br />Mr~. Waite a var•iance for~ lot ar•ea if he so desir•es one, but in the <br />absence of a var~iance, a 3-lot split cannot be gr~anted. <br />LaValle asked P1r•. Waite if he was inter~ested in explaining to the <br />council at this time, how he would like the pr•oper•ty divided into <br />two lots. <br />41ai te r•epl i ed that he was not. <br />Fahey noted that the Council will be meeting on November• 4 and would <br />r~econsider the pr•oper•ty division at that time if Mr•. ldaite so desir•es. <br />The Ci ty Cl er•k r•epor•ted that he has i nfor~med Mr~. Wai te that a var•i ance <br />for• lot ar•ea is necessar•y, however~, Waite has not applied. <br />Fahey pointed out that the City cannot for•ce 6Jaite to r•equest a <br />var•iance. <br />The City Attor~ney suggested that the matter• be continued until <br />the next Council meeting so that he can r~eview what has been appr•oved <br />r~elative to pr~evious Council meetings. The Attor~ney suggested that <br />i t may be possi bl e that the Ci ty al r•eady appr•oved var~i ances for• the <br />lots ar•ound the Sylvan Street cul-de-sac which ar•e shor~t lot ar•ea. <br />Fahey suggested that the City Cler•k r•esear•ch past Council minutes <br />and r~epor~t hi s fi ndi ngs 1 ater• i n the meeti ng. <br />Page -7- <br />