Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Nov. 4, 1987 <br />E~ <br />Dr~ainage <br />Matter~ <br />Cont.) <br />of the Eng home. <br />Scalze asked if anything could be done with the culver•ts on County <br />Road B-2 to help the pr•oblem. <br />The Engineer• did not think so pointing out that the bottom of the <br />culver•ts ar~e at the 859.7 elevation which is a foot above the lake. <br />If the culver•ts wer•e any deeper•, this would not help. <br />Scalze asked if the system dir~ects water• easily into the pond. <br />The Engineer• r•eplied that it did. <br />Fahey asked if the size culvert <br />adequate, noting that ther•e ar•e <br />water• into this one culvert. <br />under~ Mr•. Hammond's dr~iveway was <br />thr•ee 12-inch culver•ts dir~ecting <br />The Engi neer~ r~epl i ed that the cul ver•t under• the Hammond' s dr~i veway <br />is a 24-inch culver•t which had adequate capacity to handle 3 12-inch <br />cul ver•ts. <br />Fahey asked who would pay for• the dike system suggested by the Engineer•. <br />The Engineer• r•eplied that the dike system could be paid for~ jointl,y <br />be the City, Water•shed, County and State as was done in the case of <br />the Sleepy Hollow impr•ovement. <br />Mr~. Eng felt that if the thr•ee culver•ts were moved so that they lined <br />up closer• to the pond, this would help r•esolve the pr•oblem. Eng also <br />suggested that the culver~t further~ east on County Road B-2 could be <br />lined up better• with the channel into the pond. Eng also felt that <br />the cur•bing in fr~ont of his pr•oper•ty could be impr~oved. Eng pointed <br />out that the cur~bi ng i s cur•r~ently di r~ecti ng water• i nto hi s pr~oper~ty. <br />Eng pointed out that it is not the water• fr•om the lake that is a pr~oblem <br />for him, but r•ather• the water• that is coming both sides of the hill on <br />County Road B-2. <br />Fahey asked how long the level of the lake has been higher• than that <br />of the pond. <br />The Engineer was not sure. <br />Fahey asked if the filling of the Hammond pr•oper•ty contr•ibuted to the <br />problem. <br />The Engineer• pointed out that when Hammond was allowed to fill his <br />pr•oper~ty, he was al so r•equi r•ed to di g a 1 ar•ger• pond to make up the <br />di ffer~ence. <br />Eng felt that Hammond filled mor•e than he was per•mitted to. <br />The Engineer• r•eplied that this would have been checked by the Water•shed. <br />Page -10- <br />