Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Nov. 4, 1987 <br />Wake LaValle pointed out that when the wake or•dinance goes into effect <br />Or~di nance due to the water• 1 evel i n Ger•vai s, the Sher~i ff' s Depar•tment wi 11 <br />Cont. patr•ol and can bar~r•icade the channel fr •om Spoon Lake if necessar•y. <br /> The City Cler•k asked how the r•esidents on Ger•vais will know when the <br /> wake or~dinance goes into effect. <br /> Blesener• suggested that the City could put together• a notice which <br /> could quickly be deliver~ ed to the r~esidents. <br />The Council also discussed the fact that par~t of Ger•vais is in Maplewood, <br />and suggested that the City Cler•k contact the City of Maplewood and ask <br />them to r•eview the pr•oposed or•dinance and deter•mine if they would be <br />inter•ested in adopting a similar~ or•dinance. <br />New Windows Blesener• r•epor~ted that the Public t~lor~ks Depar•tment is r•ecommending that <br />for• City the windows in the City Gar•age be r•eplaced as they leak, ar•e cloudy and <br />Gar~a e ar•e not ai r•-ti ght. Publ i c Wor~k s has obtai ned two bi ds for• the wi ndow <br />5 <br /> r•eplacement. One is fr~om Advent Constr•uction in the amount of 9~2,99 <br />Agenda and the other~ from J W Builder•s in the amount of $3,200. <br />Item No. 13 <br />Mr•. Blesener• intr•oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION t~10. H7-11-540 - APPROVING THE <br /> QID OF ADVENT CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT <br /> OF $2,995.00 FOR REPLACEMENT OF FOUR WINDOWS <br /> IN THE CITY GARAGE <br /> The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•s. Scalze. <br /> Ayes (5) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, Fahey, LaValle. <br /> Nays (0). <br /> Resolution declared adopted. <br /> This r•esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 18, Page 590. <br />Li quor, Bl esener• asked for• a cl ar~i fi cati on r~egar•di ng State 1 aw and str~ong beer• <br />License licenses discussed at the pr•evious Council meeting. <br />Agenda The City Attorney explained that the City has the r•ight to enact an <br />Addition ordinance allowinp the holders of 3.2 beer and wine licenses to sell strong <br /> beer, however, the State does not allow the City to issue another license <br /> for~ the str•ong beer~. <br /> Fahey pointed out, however•, that if the holder• of a 3.2 beer~ and wine <br /> license elects to sell str•ong beer~, they must pur•chase dr•am shop <br /> i nsur•ance. <br /> The City Cler~k r•epor~ted that the license holder• must submit a copy <br /> of this insur•ance cover~age to the City which the City then for•war•ds <br /> to the State. <br />Page -16- <br />