Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Dec. 30, 1987 <br />VanGuilder• The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Blesener~. <br />Rezoning Ayes (5) Fahey, ~lesener~, Collova, LaValle, Scalze. <br />(Cont.) Nays (0). <br />Resolution declar~ed adopted. <br />This r•esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 18, Page 633. <br />Kai ser•- Mr~. Fahey r•epor•ted that the Ci ty has r•ecei ved an appl i cati on fr•om <br />schor•n Lot Kaiser•schor•n Custom Homes for~ a division of pr~oper•ty on Sylvan Str~eet <br />Split into two lots. The Planner• has submitted a r•epor•t dated December• 7, <br />1987 r•ecommending appr~oval. Also, the Planning Commission has <br />Agenda r•ecommended appr•oval subject to satisfacbory dr~ainage and utility <br />Item No. 7 easements. <br />The Ci ty Engi neer• r•epor~ted that Kai ser~schor~n Custom Homes has submi tted <br />a sur~vey with satisfactor•y dr•ainage and utility easements ar~ound lot <br />lines as well as a 10 foot easement on the nor~ther•n pr•operty line. <br />Easements ar•ound the other• pr•oper~ty 1 i nes ar~e 6 feet i n wi dth. <br />Mr~s. Scalze intr~oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 87-12-585 - APPROVI~IG THE <br />KAISERSCHORN LOT SPLIT AS SUBMITTED SU[3JECT <br />TO DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEP~ENTS ON LOT <br />LINES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ENGINEER <br />WHICH INCLUDE A 10-FOOT UTILITY AND/OR <br />DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE NORTHERN PROPERTY <br />LINE <br />The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr~. Blesener•. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Blesener~, Collova, LaValle, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declar~ed adopted. <br />This r•eoslution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 18, Page 634. <br />Buche Lot Fahey r~epor~ted that the City has r~eceived application fr~om Patr•icia <br />Spl i t Buche to di vi de her• pr•oper•ty on Mor•r•i son Avenue i nto thr~ee 1 ots. <br />The Planner has submitted a r~eport dated December 4, 1987 r~ecommending <br />Agenda appr•oval of the pr•oper•ty division. The Planning Commission has also <br />Item No. 8 recommended approval. <br />The City Cler~k r•epor~ted that the necessar~y easements have been submitted <br />and the lot split application is in or•der~. <br />Scalze noted that the lots ar~e called outlots on the sur•vey. <br />The Planner• r•eplied that this was a mistake and a new sur•vey has been <br />submitted identifying the lots e~s tr~acts. <br />Pa9e -7- <br />