My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-88 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
02-10-88 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:41:19 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Feb. 10, 1988 <br />Par•k <br />Sur~vey <br />(Cont.) <br />LaValle asked the length of the sur•vey. <br />Tr•axler• felt the average amount of time that would be spent on the <br />phone for• this sur•vey would be 18 minutes, but pointed out that length <br />of time will depend on how opiniated the r•espondent is. Some sur•veys <br />could take as long as 45 minutes. <br />Scalze suggested that the sur~vey not addr~ess pr~oper~ties over~ which the <br />City has no contr•ol and fur•ther• suggested that questions 20 thr•ough <br />49 be deleted fr•om the sur•vey. <br />Collova agreed. <br />Mor~el an asked i f ther•e was no i nter~est i n the par~t of the Ci ty to <br />pur~chase the Capital View or~ Kellogg pr•oper•ties. <br />Scalze pointed out that Capital View has not been programmed for <br />activities for~ a year•. <br />P1or~elan pointed out the use of the outdoor• facilities at Capital View <br />such as the tennis cour~ts and ballfields. <br />lJehr•le pointed out that question 88 dealt with possible aco,uisition <br />of Capital View. <br />Rlesener• suggested that question 20 be r•etained, but that 21 thr•ough <br />24 be deleted. alesener• then suggested that after~ question 2II the <br />use of gym and pool facilities at Capital View be sur•veyed. <br />Wehrle suggested that gymrasium facilities be included in question <br />29. <br />Wehr•le suggested that question 88 be placed in this area of the sur~vey. <br />Traxler replied that the order of the survey is mixed in order to keep <br />the sur•vey i nter•esti ng to the r•espondents. <br />Scalze suggested that questions 30 thr•ough 44 be de1eted. <br />Council agr•eed. <br />ScaYze asked the feelings for• deleting questions 45 thr•ough 49. <br />Collova felt a question should be included regarding Gervais Beach. <br />Blesener agreed that the survey should ask if City residents use <br />Gervais Beach. <br />Traxler• suggestion that question 47 be r~etained as it applies to <br />Ger•vais Beach, but that the sur•veyor• will also ask if the Beach is <br />not used at all by the r~espondent. <br />Page -2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.