03-09-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MI~IUTES City Council March 9, 1988 Ni r•i ng RESOLUTION N0. 88-3-90 - APPROVI~IG THE New HIRING OF PAT DUNN IN A PERP1ANENT POSITION Maintenance AS MAINTE~IANCE WORKER IN TNE PUBLIC b10RKS Employee DEPARTMENT AT A RATE OF PAY EQUAL TO 85% (Cont.) OF THE SALARY OF SCOTT HEATON, CITY MAINTENANCE WORKER, WITH THE TWO SALARIES TO BECOME EQUAL AFTER A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•s. Scalze. Ayes (5) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle, Fahey. Nays (0). Resolution declar~ed adopted. This r~esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 95. Water• Loss Blesener~ r•eviewed the letter~ r•eceived by the City fr~om the Boar•d of Reimbur•se- ~dater~ Commissioner~s which states that they will adjust the City's ment water~ r~ate for• the fir•st 8 1/2 months of 1987, reducing that r•ate by 15% due to the i naccur~ate r~egi ster•i ng of thei r• water~ meter• and Agenda subsequent over~charge to the City for• water used. The 15% adjustment Item No. 14 amounts to $41,092.97 and will be paid back to the City over• the months of Mar~ch and Apr•il of 1988. Blesener~ also r•epor•ted that he had a couple of questions r~egar•ding the water~ r•epor•t that was submitted by the Public Wor~ks Super•intendent at the last Council meetinq. Blesener reported that he will discuss these questions with the Super•intendent. Scalze pointed out that Arden Hills receives its water from the City of Roseville at Roseville's lower• r~ate. Dlesener~ r•eplied that it was tr~ue, however~, it was his under•standing that such practices would be ending and that the City of St. Paul will be metering water• as it leaves Roseville and those cities obtaining water~ thr•ough Roseville will be char•ged at the same r~ate Little Canada is r~eceiving. Debr•is Collova r•epor~ted that the C~uilding Inspector~ is handling complaints Complaints about debr•is on a case-by-case basis, and, hopefully, clean-ups will take pl ace i n the spr~i ng or~ ear•1y summer~ on a vol untar•y basi s. Agenda Item No. 15 Fahey asked if City or~dinance allowed the City to go in a remove debr•is and assess the cost of clean-up against the pr~oper•ty. The City Attor~ney r•eplied that notice to the homeowner~ was necessar•y, however~, the or~dinance did allow the City to under~take such clean-up. Fahey asked about clean-up of items such as aopliances or~ unlicensed car•s. The Attor~ney was unsur•e whether~ the or•di nance addr~essed 1 ar•ger i tems . Page -12-