Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Apr•il 13, 1988 <br />Payne Blesener• suggested that the Council think about the alter~natives <br />Avenue suggested by the City Engineer•. Blesener~ also suggested that the <br />(Cont.) City have some test holes dr•awn on the south end of the str~eet to <br />determine soil conditions in that area. <br />The Engineer agreed. <br />Qlesener• suggested that per•haps only an over•lay is necessar~y on the <br />south end of the str•eet. <br />Ar•kwr•ight The City Engineer r•epor•ted that it was a simple matter• to cor•r•ect <br />Estimated <br />d Br~ooks <br />t <br />Dr•ainage the dr•ainage pr~oblem at Ar•kwr•ight between . <br />on an <br />Sex <br /> cost of the impr~ovement is $4,700. <br />Agenda <br />Item No. llc <br />Blesener• suggested the <br />City Engineer• meet <br />with the two pr•oper~ty owner~s <br /> involved and get their~ viewpoints on the impr•ovement. <br />Keller• Pkwy. The Engineer• pr~esented var•ious alter~natives for• pr•oviding water• to <br />Water & Keller Parkway residents which were reviewed with the Council. <br />Ander•son <br />Addition The City Cler~k pointed out that the City of Maplewood has no intention <br />of bringing water into the area. <br />Agenda <br />Item ~lo. lle Blesener~ pointed out the indication in the sur•vey of the need for• a <br />& 12 bike path ar~ound the Lake. f3lesener• questioned whether~ or~ not <br />r•esidents on the lake would be in favor of such an impr•ovement. <br />Scalze r•epor•ted that she has had r•esidents on the lake make such a <br />r•equest and noted that many of these r•esidents use the lake for• walking <br />and biking. <br />Fahey suggested that the Ci ty Cl er~k i nfor~m the r•esi dents of the ar~ea <br />that if they desir•e water•, they should petition for• the impr~ovement. <br />Fahey also noted that the City gave the owner• of the Ander•son Addition <br />in Maplewood a cost estimate for~ the extension of Little Canada water~- <br />main to ser•ve this pr~oper•ty. Nowever•, the City r~eceived no r~esponse. <br />Blesener suggested that a new estimate he provided to the owner of <br />the Ander~son Addition which takes into consider~ation the cost of <br />inflation. <br />The City Cler•k suggested that the City Auditor~ also r•eview the cost <br />pr•oposal . <br />P4r~. Blesener• intr•oduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTIO~I N0. 88-~4-134 - I~ISTRUCTI~IG THE <br />CITY ENGINEER TO RFVIEW THE CITY'S PREVIOUS <br />PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE t~!ATER TO THE A~JDERSON <br />ADDITION WITH THE ~lEW OL+INER OF THAT PROPCRTY <br />Paqe -15- <br />